is the sha256sum of SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso correct?
Hi, Is the following hash the correct one? 13650ef94c16024285fd9dadebba4d62a33c0de5ac611314bf8e3d6afb956a3a SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso Thanks. Fred
RE: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] is the sha256sum of SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso correct?
G > -Original Message- > From: Pat Riehecky [mailto:riehe...@fnal.gov] > Sent: 星期一, 四月 03, 2017 22:20 > To: Fred Liu; scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov > Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] is the sha256sum of > SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso correct? > > Good catch. Somehow the signature got reverted to the RC image. > > The correct signature is > 68992289a1163250ba064c23baa8c4b23d11e5dc0562de41971bdf9c2ad42415 > > I'll get a new set of SHA files posted. Sorry for the error. > > On 04/01/2017 03:06 AM, Fred Liu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is the following hash the correct one? > > > > 13650ef94c16024285fd9dadebba4d62a33c0de5ac611314bf8e3d6afb956a3a > SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Fred
RE: kicked off the list via Office 365?
me too > -Original Message- > From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov > [mailto:owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of Howard, > Chris > Sent: 星期四, 十一月 15, 2018 23:39 > To: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@fnal.gov > Subject: kicked off the list via Office 365? > > FYI > > I received a kicked-off-the-list message which seems to indicate that either > the > listserv or people being relayed through the listserv were falling afoul of > Office > 365 spam-control on my end, which gave me too many bounces and hence, > kicked off.
Fwd: Your removal from the SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS list
What is this? -- Forwarded message - From: Fermilab LISTSERV Server (16.0) Date: 2018年11月15日周四 下午2:02 Subject: Your removal from the SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS list To: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:02:23 You have been automatically removed from the SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS list (Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide) as a result of repeated delivery error reports from your mail system. This decision was based on the list's automatic error monitoring policy and has not been reviewed or otherwise confirmed by a person. If you receive this message, then it means that something is wrong. While you are obviously able to receive mail, your mail system has been regularly reporting that your account did not exist, or that you were otherwise permanently unable to receive mail. Here is some information that may assist you or your local help desk in determining the cause of the problem: - The failing address is fred.f...@gmail.com. - The first error was reported on 2018-09-04. - Since then, a total of 7 delivery errors have been received. - The last reported error was: 5.1.8 550 5.1.8 Access denied, bad outboundsender. Formoreinformationplease goto https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__go.microsoft.com_fwlink_-3FLinkId-3D526653&d=DwIFaQ&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=gd8BzeSQcySVxr0gDWSEbN-P-pgDXkdyCtaMqdCgPPdW1cyL5RIpaIYrCn8C5x2A&m=rUo3B0qf2Uw-s4RhNyXji2xFzpU_AIe6DbvuonXIov0&s=a-t6j2RMLbvHVxTf4D4B80ynBqAIynmqz5jNQu71J-I&e=. S(8991) [DM2PR09MB0399.namprd09.prod.outlook.com] [BL2PR09CA0020.namprd09.prod.outlook.com] [BN1AFFO11FD027.protection.gbl] Please do not ignore this message. While you can re-subscribe to the list, it is important for you to report this problem to your mail administrator so that it can be solved. This problem is not specific to the SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS list and may also affect your private mail. This means that you may have lost some private mail as well. Anyone trying to write to you during the same time frame might have received the same errors for the same reason.
Re: Your removal from the SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS list
I lost the mails from 11/12 to 11/15 ... Fred Liu 于2018年11月16日周五 下午6:41写道： > > What is this? > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Fermilab LISTSERV Server (16.0) > Date: 2018年11月15日周四 下午2:02 > Subject: Your removal from the SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS list > To: > > > > Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:02:23 > > You have been automatically removed from the SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS list > (Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide) as a result of > repeated delivery error reports from your mail system. This decision was > based on the list's automatic error monitoring policy and has not been > reviewed or otherwise confirmed by a person. If you receive this message, > then it means that something is wrong. While you are obviously able to > receive mail, your mail system has been regularly reporting that your > account did not exist, or that you were otherwise permanently unable to > receive mail. Here is some information that may assist you or your local > help desk in determining the cause of the problem: > > - The failing address is fred.f...@gmail.com. > > - The first error was reported on 2018-09-04. > > - Since then, a total of 7 delivery errors have been received. > > - The last reported error was: 5.1.8 550 5.1.8 Access denied, bad > outboundsender. Formoreinformationplease goto > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__go.microsoft.com_fwlink_-3FLinkId-3D526653&d=DwIFaQ&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=gd8BzeSQcySVxr0gDWSEbN-P-pgDXkdyCtaMqdCgPPdW1cyL5RIpaIYrCn8C5x2A&m=2eiNF49aI3l4On-amZwE_VfT8INXz4Pu6j7ka2QY_JU&s=kEnPyA_eYCgoMC99GPlHKTN2L6wAq2LfsPhHwaLAO7Q&e=. > S(8991) > [DM2PR09MB0399.namprd09.prod.outlook.com] > [BL2PR09CA0020.namprd09.prod.outlook.com] [BN1AFFO11FD027.protection.gbl] > > Please do not ignore this message. While you can re-subscribe to the > list, it is important for you to report this problem to your mail > administrator so that it can be solved. This problem is not specific to > the SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS list and may also affect your private mail. > This means that you may have lost some private mail as well. Anyone > trying to write to you during the same time frame might have received the > same errors for the same reason.
