RE: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] is the sha256sum of SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso correct?
G > -Original Message- > From: Pat Riehecky [mailto:riehe...@fnal.gov] > Sent: 星期一, 四月 03, 2017 22:20 > To: Fred Liu; scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov > Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] is the sha256sum of > SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso correct? > > Good catch. Somehow the signature got reverted to the RC image. > > The correct signature is > 68992289a1163250ba064c23baa8c4b23d11e5dc0562de41971bdf9c2ad42415 > > I'll get a new set of SHA files posted. Sorry for the error. > > On 04/01/2017 03:06 AM, Fred Liu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is the following hash the correct one? > > > > 13650ef94c16024285fd9dadebba4d62a33c0de5ac611314bf8e3d6afb956a3a > SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Fred
Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] is the sha256sum of SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso correct?
Good catch. Somehow the signature got reverted to the RC image. The correct signature is 68992289a1163250ba064c23baa8c4b23d11e5dc0562de41971bdf9c2ad42415 I'll get a new set of SHA files posted. Sorry for the error. On 04/01/2017 03:06 AM, Fred Liu wrote: Hi, Is the following hash the correct one? 13650ef94c16024285fd9dadebba4d62a33c0de5ac611314bf8e3d6afb956a3a SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso Thanks. Fred
is the sha256sum of SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso correct?
Hi, Is the following hash the correct one? 13650ef94c16024285fd9dadebba4d62a33c0de5ac611314bf8e3d6afb956a3a SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso Thanks. Fred