Re: Serious New Install problem

2010-01-14 Thread Tim Edwards
On 13/01/10 21:09, Troy Dawson wrote:

>>
>> What we are planning to do till we can get this sorted out is to
>> install Open Suse 9.3   as 10.3  screwed up with LVM trash.
>>
>> Larry Linder

If you do go down the Opensuse route the current version is 11.2 and it
works quite nicely, even presents you the option of partitioned-based
disk layout or LVM-based in the installer (you can choose to completely
customise it too). 9.3 was end-of-life nearly 2.5 years ago and 10.3 is
also discontinued. http://en.opensuse.org/SUSE_Linux_Lifetime

Good luck

Tim Edwards


problem and question

2010-01-14 Thread Dusan Bruncko

Hi,

My problem:
up to now I am  still using ipw3845 driver, no look to the fact, that this
one is obsolete, and people use iwl3945. Of course I can able to use both 
drivers,
but the wireless situation is not stable now, time to time I am out from wi-fi
connection (seems to randomly).
My present kernel is 2.6.18-164.10.1.el5. When I booting all is ok., 
after some time (randomly) no. The dmesg gave nothing, in really to 
restart wi-fi I must to switch-off and switch-on wi-fi hard key. 
I think, that the problem can be connect with iwl3945 behaviour and maybe 
some crashing with  ipw3945, I do not know...

Unfortunately I cannot make rmmod for iwl... drivers if I use ipw3945, and
from another side, if I do not use ipw3945, my using iwl... is still not 
stable.

I have Toshiba, Qosmio, G30-155.

Can you look no this problem, please?

I asked Akima Yagi already and he proposed me to make firstly:

for BUSID in $(/sbin/lspci | awk '{ IGNORECASE=1 } /net/ { print $1
for cmdsubst> }'); do /sbin/lspci -s $BUSID -m; /sbin/lspci -s $BUSID -n; 
done
02:00.0 "Ethernet controller" "Intel Corporation" "82573L Gigabit Ethernet 
Controller" "Toshiba America Info Systems" "Unknown device 0001"

02:00.0 0200: 8086:109a
05:00.0 "Network controller" "Intel Corporation" "PRO/Wireless 3945ABG 
[Golan] Network Connection" -r02 "Intel Corporation" "Unknown device 1041"

05:00.0 0280: 8086:4222 (rev 02)


Regards,
 Dusan


Re: dbus and a broken pipe - solved

2010-01-14 Thread Jim Green
Hi all

I recently posted the following query on this list

> I'm running a freshly installed sl51 and on login get a very annoying
> message from the gnome-settings-manager about being unable to
> contact to socket: /tmp/dbus-kjsdfhjd : connection refused.
>  :

but had no replies -- I post a solution for the sake of the archive.

Further research on Google revealed that this problem can be caused
by an old bug in dbus, which introduced a race condition on pipes
being closed at the time a process wanted to write to them.

I tried to update dbus within SL51 but found a cascade of dependencies
made this "too interesting" to follow through.  A clean install of SL54 on
the same hardware (and with the same corporate setup) fixes the
problem for me.

Cheers

Jim
-- 
J.J. Green,  Seaview Sensing Ltd., http://seaviewsensing.com/


Serious New Install Problem - 2

2010-01-14 Thread Larry Linder
We had the same problem on a test box micro atx board with dual core & 2 G Ram 
when we first installed it.   We were doing a few more test and now the 64 
bit system works and I can add users with the GUI and it gets done correctly 
and works.
There is a problem with a new rewrite for the login checking script.
I found it listed as in BugZilla.   
Will send you the bug report tomorrow

Don't plan to give up on SL is the long term answer to our OS issues.  -The 
only thing I will miss is the neat maintence scheme Open Suse has.

Larry Linder


Re: problem and question

2010-01-14 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Dusan Bruncko  wrote:
>        Hi,
>
> My problem:
> up to now I am  still using ipw3845 driver, no look to the fact, that this
> one is obsolete, and people use iwl3945. Of course I can able to use both
> drivers,
> but the wireless situation is not stable now, time to time I am out from
> wi-fi
> connection (seems to randomly).
> My present kernel is 2.6.18-164.10.1.el5. When I booting all is ok., after
> some time (randomly) no. The dmesg gave nothing, in really to restart wi-fi
> I must to switch-off and switch-on wi-fi hard key. I think, that the problem
> can be connect with iwl3945 behaviour and maybe some crashing with  ipw3945,
> I do not know...
> Unfortunately I cannot make rmmod for iwl... drivers if I use ipw3945, and
> from another side, if I do not use ipw3945, my using iwl... is still not
> stable.
> I have Toshiba, Qosmio, G30-155.
>
> Can you look no this problem, please?
>
> I asked Akima Yagi already and he proposed me to make firstly:
>
> for BUSID in $(/sbin/lspci | awk '{ IGNORECASE=1 } /net/ { print $1
> for cmdsubst> }'); do /sbin/lspci -s $BUSID -m; /sbin/lspci -s $BUSID -n;
> done
> 02:00.0 "Ethernet controller" "Intel Corporation" "82573L Gigabit Ethernet
> Controller" "Toshiba America Info Systems" "Unknown device 0001"
> 02:00.0 0200: 8086:109a
> 05:00.0 "Network controller" "Intel Corporation" "PRO/Wireless 3945ABG
> [Golan] Network Connection" -r02 "Intel Corporation" "Unknown device 1041"
> 05:00.0 0280: 8086:4222 (rev 02)

That information confirms that the e1000e and iwl3945 drivers should
be used with the
2.6.18-164.10.1.el5 kernel (quoting Alan).

This is how you find this out: go to the ELRepo FAQ page at
http://elrepo.org/tiki/FAQ .

FAQ Number 4 provides a detailed description on how to identify the
driver through  the Vendor:Device ID pair.  In your case, it is
8086:109a for the ethernet controller and 8086:4222 for the wireless
device.

The command:

grep -i 8086 /lib/modules/*/modules.alias | grep -i 109a

returns (among other things)

/lib/modules/2.6.18-164.10.1.el5/modules.alias:alias
pci:v8086d109Asv*sd*bc*sc*i* e1000e

Likewise, the other pair gives you iwl3945.

I realize you have [tried] both ipw3945 and iwl3945. Now that you are
running the current kernel, I think you should use iwl3945. Make sure
you have the correct firmware installed.

Akemi


Re: problem and question

2010-01-14 Thread Troy Dawson

Akemi Yagi wrote:

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Dusan Bruncko  wrote:

   Hi,

My problem:
up to now I am  still using ipw3845 driver, no look to the fact, that this
one is obsolete, and people use iwl3945. Of course I can able to use both
drivers,
but the wireless situation is not stable now, time to time I am out from
wi-fi
connection (seems to randomly).
My present kernel is 2.6.18-164.10.1.el5. When I booting all is ok., after
some time (randomly) no. The dmesg gave nothing, in really to restart wi-fi
I must to switch-off and switch-on wi-fi hard key. I think, that the problem
can be connect with iwl3945 behaviour and maybe some crashing with  ipw3945,
I do not know...
Unfortunately I cannot make rmmod for iwl... drivers if I use ipw3945, and
from another side, if I do not use ipw3945, my using iwl... is still not
stable.
I have Toshiba, Qosmio, G30-155.

Can you look no this problem, please?

I asked Akima Yagi already and he proposed me to make firstly:

for BUSID in $(/sbin/lspci | awk '{ IGNORECASE=1 } /net/ { print $1
for cmdsubst> }'); do /sbin/lspci -s $BUSID -m; /sbin/lspci -s $BUSID -n;
done
02:00.0 "Ethernet controller" "Intel Corporation" "82573L Gigabit Ethernet
Controller" "Toshiba America Info Systems" "Unknown device 0001"
02:00.0 0200: 8086:109a
05:00.0 "Network controller" "Intel Corporation" "PRO/Wireless 3945ABG
[Golan] Network Connection" -r02 "Intel Corporation" "Unknown device 1041"
05:00.0 0280: 8086:4222 (rev 02)


That information confirms that the e1000e and iwl3945 drivers should
be used with the
2.6.18-164.10.1.el5 kernel (quoting Alan).

This is how you find this out: go to the ELRepo FAQ page at
http://elrepo.org/tiki/FAQ .

FAQ Number 4 provides a detailed description on how to identify the
driver through  the Vendor:Device ID pair.  In your case, it is
8086:109a for the ethernet controller and 8086:4222 for the wireless
device.

The command:

grep -i 8086 /lib/modules/*/modules.alias | grep -i 109a

returns (among other things)

/lib/modules/2.6.18-164.10.1.el5/modules.alias:alias
pci:v8086d109Asv*sd*bc*sc*i* e1000e

Likewise, the other pair gives you iwl3945.

I realize you have [tried] both ipw3945 and iwl3945. Now that you are
running the current kernel, I think you should use iwl3945. Make sure
you have the correct firmware installed.

Akemi


To make sure you have the correct firmware

  yum install iwlwifi-3945-ucode.noarch
  rpm -qa | grep iwl | sort

Also, you should completely get rid of the ipw3945 stuff, or it will 
keep creeping in and messing things up.


  /etc/rc.d/init.d/ipw3945d stop
  yum remove "*ipw3945*"

It would be a good idea to reboot after this.

Troy
--
__
Troy Dawson  daw...@fnal.gov  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LSCS/CSI/USS Group
__


Re: dbus and a broken pipe - solved

2010-01-14 Thread Connie Sieh

Jim,

Thanks for the update.

-connie

On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, Jim Green wrote:


Hi all

I recently posted the following query on this list


I'm running a freshly installed sl51 and on login get a very annoying
message from the gnome-settings-manager about being unable to
contact to socket: /tmp/dbus-kjsdfhjd : connection refused.
 :


but had no replies -- I post a solution for the sake of the archive.

Further research on Google revealed that this problem can be caused
by an old bug in dbus, which introduced a race condition on pipes
being closed at the time a process wanted to write to them.

I tried to update dbus within SL51 but found a cascade of dependencies
made this "too interesting" to follow through.  A clean install of SL54 on
the same hardware (and with the same corporate setup) fixes the
problem for me.

Cheers

Jim