Packages openmpi in SL5.3 x86_64
Hello, I noticed that the package openmpi (+related) have a lower version in security updates than in the reference for SL5.3 x86_64 : ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/53/x86_64/SL/ = openmpi-1.2.7-6.el5.i386.rpm ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/53/x86_64/updates/security/ = openmpi-1.2.3-4.el5.x86_64.rpm Is this normal ? Thanks JM -- Jean-michel BARBET| Tel: +33 (0)2 51 85 84 86 Laboratoire SUBATECH Nantes France| Fax: +33 (0)2 51 85 84 79 CNRS-IN2P3/Ecole des Mines/Universite | E-Mail: bar...@subatech.in2p3.fr
Re: Packages openmpi in SL5.3 x86_64
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Jean-Michel Barbet jean-michel.bar...@subatech.in2p3.fr wrote: Hello, I noticed that the package openmpi (+related) have a lower version in security updates than in the reference for SL5.3 x86_64 : ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/53/x86_64/SL/ = openmpi-1.2.7-6.el5.i386.rpm ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/53/x86_64/updates/security/ = openmpi-1.2.3-4.el5.x86_64.rpm Is this normal ? Out of date skew is not necessarily expected, but unsurprising, if you stay at an old release. Security updates that were published for SL 5.1 or SL 5.2 could be in the security updates channel, . Why aren't you updated to SL 5.8, which is being actively maintained and has openmpi-1.4.4 ?
Re: Packages openmpi in SL5.3 x86_64
On 10/16/2012 12:30 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: [...]Why aren't you updated to SL 5.8, which is being actively maintained and has openmpi-1.4.4 ? Thanks Nico, yes I know I should run latest SL5 versions. At some point all these machines will be reinstalled in SL6 but I was just curious. JM -- Jean-michel BARBET| Tel: +33 (0)2 51 85 84 86 Laboratoire SUBATECH Nantes France| Fax: +33 (0)2 51 85 84 79 CNRS-IN2P3/Ecole des Mines/Universite | E-Mail: bar...@subatech.in2p3.fr
Distribution Servers Downtime - 30 minutes on Oct 18 2012 6:00 CDT
The distribution servers rsync.scientificlinux.org, ftp.scientificlinux.org, ftp1.scientificlinux.org, and ftp2.scientificlinux.org will be going down on: Thursday October 18, 2012 at 06:00am CDT (Chicago) Affected Machines: * rsync.scientificlinux.org * ftp.scientificlinux.org * ftp1.scientificlinux.org * ftp2.scientificlinux.org Why Downtime: Network Services will change network paths on network that has the backing store for the above servers. Begin Downtime: October 18, 2012 at 06:00am CDT (Chicago) End Downtime: October 18, 2012 at 06:30am CDT (Chicago) The downtime is expected to last for less than 30 minutes. For your local time you can run date -d '2011-10-06 09:00 CDT' Thank you for your patience while we perform this maintenance. -Connie Sieh
http://www.scientificlinux.org Server Downtime - 30 minutes on Oct 18 2012 6:00 CDT
The web server http://www.scientificlinux.org will be unavailable on: Thursday October 18, 2012 at 06:00am CDT (Chicago) Affected Machines: * http://www.scientificlinux.org Why Downtime: Network Services will change network paths on network that contains the above server. Begin Downtime: October 18, 2012 at 06:00am CDT (Chicago) End Downtime: October 18, 2012 at 06:30am CDT (Chicago) The downtime is expected to last for less than 30 minutes. For your local time you can run date -d '2011-10-06 09:00 CDT' Thank you for your patience while we perform this maintenance. -Connie Sieh
Re: Distribution Servers Downtime - 30 minutes on Oct 18 2012 6:00 CDT
On 16 October 2012 23:42, Connie Sieh cs...@fnal.gov wrote: snip For your local time you can run date -d '2011-10-06 09:00 CDT' Ahem, cough. Might I suggest the more appropriate -- date -d '2012-10-18 06:00 CDT' Alan.
Re: Distribution Servers Downtime - 30 minutes on Oct 18 2012 6:00 CDT
Much better, Alan. ;-) -- Henrique LonelySpooky Junior http://about.me/henriquejunior From: Alan Bartlett a...@elrepo.org To: Connie Sieh cs...@fnal.gov Cc: scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov; scientific-linux-mirr...@fnal.gov Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 7:55 PM Subject: Re: Distribution Servers Downtime - 30 minutes on Oct 18 2012 6:00 CDT On 16 October 2012 23:42, Connie Sieh cs...@fnal.gov wrote: snip For your local time you can run date -d '2011-10-06 09:00 CDT' Ahem, cough. Might I suggest the more appropriate -- date -d '2012-10-18 06:00 CDT' Alan.
