Re: No more flash updates?

2013-01-17 Thread Gerhard Schneider
On 01/17/2013 12:22 AM, Paul Robert Marino wrote:

 Most of the functions of flash plus better 3D rendering can now be
 achieved by HTML 5, so really flash is only being used now for legacy
 web site support. Most mobile devices don't support flash but they all
 support HTML 5. Adobe has even started changing their development
 suites to output HTML5 instead of flash whenever possible. There is
 really no point in developing new web apps in flash any more unless
 the programmer hasn't learned HTML 5 yet.
 

My small problem is that Adobe applications like Captivate produce
HTML5 output using mp3 sound - not supported in Firefox.
So we neither will have mp3 nor Flash in Firefox.

GS

-- 
Gerhard Schneidere-Mail:g...@ilsb.tuwien.ac.at
Institute of Lightweight Design and  Tel.:   +43 1 58801 31716
Structural Biomechanics (E317)   Fax.:   +43 1 58801 31799
Vienna University of Technology / AustriaDVR: 0005886
A-1040 Wien, Gusshausstrasse 27-29 http://www.ilsb.tuwien.ac.at/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


C++11, the devtools package and PUIAS

2013-01-17 Thread Jan Kundrát

Hi,
I'd like to get a decent support for the C++11 language on SL6. RH ships the devtoolset 
[1] package for just this purpose; the PUIAS repo [2] has the RPMs. However, I am not 
much familiar with the PUIAS, so I would like to ask here for references -- is that a 
repository which is known to be good? Any plans to make devtools available as 
a part of the SL?

With kind regards,
Jan

[1] https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/
[2] http://springdale.math.ias.edu/data/puias/DevToolset/6.3/

--
Trojitá, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/


Re: No more flash updates?

2013-01-17 Thread Paul Robert Marino
yea I have to admit the mp3 thing is a little annoying but can be
fixed by any number of plugins so its not a total loss. but then again
audio in websites has always been an odd thing to implement.

that being said Ive been using novnc on an almost daily basis. despite
the unavoidable latency it adds due to the fact that its translating
VNC to HTML 5 and back it probably the handiest remote console client
Ive ever used because it just works in any browser on any workstation
or phone without using any plugins.


On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Gerhard Schneider
g...@ilsb.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
 On 01/17/2013 12:22 AM, Paul Robert Marino wrote:

 Most of the functions of flash plus better 3D rendering can now be
 achieved by HTML 5, so really flash is only being used now for legacy
 web site support. Most mobile devices don't support flash but they all
 support HTML 5. Adobe has even started changing their development
 suites to output HTML5 instead of flash whenever possible. There is
 really no point in developing new web apps in flash any more unless
 the programmer hasn't learned HTML 5 yet.


 My small problem is that Adobe applications like Captivate produce
 HTML5 output using mp3 sound - not supported in Firefox.
 So we neither will have mp3 nor Flash in Firefox.

 GS

 --
 Gerhard Schneidere-Mail:g...@ilsb.tuwien.ac.at
 Institute of Lightweight Design and  Tel.:   +43 1 58801 31716
 Structural Biomechanics (E317)   Fax.:   +43 1 58801 31799
 Vienna University of Technology / AustriaDVR: 0005886
 A-1040 Wien, Gusshausstrasse 27-29 http://www.ilsb.tuwien.ac.at/



Re: C++11, the devtools package and PUIAS

2013-01-17 Thread Stephan Wiesand
Hi Jan,

On Jan 17, 2013, at 16:12 , Jan Kundrát wrote:

 Hi,
 I'd like to get a decent support for the C++11 language on SL6. RH ships the 
 devtoolset [1] package for just this purpose; the PUIAS repo [2] has the 
 RPMs. However, I am not much familiar with the PUIAS, so I would like to ask 
 here for references -- is that a repository which is known to be good?

I've cherry-picked packages from their repos and have been happy with those. 
There's always some trust involved when you install software from yet another 
source, but I don't consider this one higher risk than the others we draw from.

Back then when the EL clones had problems with the rebuild of nfs-utils in 6.1, 
PUIAS was bug-compatible with the others including SL ;-)

 Any plans to make devtools available as a part of the SL?

Connie said she was working on releasing them a while ago, but it seems that 
hasn't happened. Connie, any news?

I also managed to rebuild them myself, but the procedure was a bit odd and I 
would much rather use packages rebuilt by someone more experienced with that. 
Next time a user asks for them, and they're not available from SL, I'd probably 
pick them from PUIAS now.

Best regards,
Stephan


 With kind regards,
 Jan
 
 [1] https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/
 [2] http://springdale.math.ias.edu/data/puias/DevToolset/6.3/

-- 
Stephan Wiesand
DESY -DV-
Platanenenallee 6
15738 Zeuthen, Germany


java vulnerability

2013-01-17 Thread Ken Teh

What's the status of the java package that's installed on SL6x?  
java-1.6.0-openjdk.  Is it vulnerable to this java security flaw that made the 
national news this week?  Cyber is advising us to remove it but a lot of 
packages depend on it.  The biggie is LibreOffice.

Thanks!


Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] java vulnerability

2013-01-17 Thread Pat Riehecky

On 01/17/2013 10:54 AM, Ken Teh wrote:
What's the status of the java package that's installed on SL6x?  
java-1.6.0-openjdk.  Is it vulnerable to this java security flaw that 
made the national news this week?  Cyber is advising us to remove it 
but a lot of packages depend on it.  The biggie is LibreOffice.


Thanks!


If you've got particular CVEs you are concerned about those are easier 
to see if they are resolved.


At this time there are no unpublished security updates for SL 5 or SL 6 
on our build systems.


Pat

--
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux Developer


Re: java vulnerability

2013-01-17 Thread Connie Sieh

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Ken Teh wrote:

What's the status of the java package that's installed on SL6x? 
java-1.6.0-openjdk.  Is it vulnerable to this java security flaw that 
made the national news this week?  Cyber is advising us to remove it but 
a lot of packages depend on it.  The biggie is LibreOffice.


I thought that the biggest issue was with Java 7 and not Java 6.

-connie


Thanks!



Re: java vulnerability

2013-01-17 Thread Connie Sieh

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Connie Sieh wrote:


On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Ken Teh wrote:


What's the status of the java package that's installed on SL6x?
java-1.6.0-openjdk.  Is it vulnerable to this java security flaw that
made the national news this week?  Cyber is advising us to remove it but
a lot of packages depend on it.  The biggie is LibreOffice.


I thought that the biggest issue was with Java 7 and not Java 6.


And as Pat said a specific CVE should help answer this.

-Connie Sieh



-connie


Thanks!





Re: java vulnerability

2013-01-17 Thread Stephan Wiesand
On Jan 17, 2013, at 18:15 , Connie Sieh wrote:

 On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Ken Teh wrote:
 
 What's the status of the java package that's installed on SL6x? 
 java-1.6.0-openjdk.  Is it vulnerable to this java security flaw that made 
 the national news this week?  Cyber is advising us to remove it but a lot of 
 packages depend on it.  The biggie is LibreOffice.
 
 I thought that the biggest issue was with Java 7 and not Java 6.


That's what I thought. In any case, removing the browser plugin (icedtea-web 
with openjdk) seems to be the most important step, and advisable wherever 
feasible. LibreOffice shouldn't depend on that.

A related question: Does anyone know whether openjdk6 will continue to be 
supported after the Oracle JDK6 end of service life?

-- 
Stephan Wiesand
DESY -DV-
Platanenenallee 6
15738 Zeuthen, Germany


Re: java vulnerability

2013-01-17 Thread Connie Sieh

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Connie Sieh wrote:


On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Connie Sieh wrote:


On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Ken Teh wrote:


What's the status of the java package that's installed on SL6x?
java-1.6.0-openjdk.  Is it vulnerable to this java security flaw that
made the national news this week?  Cyber is advising us to remove it but
a lot of packages depend on it.  The biggie is LibreOffice.


I thought that the biggest issue was with Java 7 and not Java 6.


And as Pat said a specific CVE should help answer this.


Synopsis:  Important: java-1.7.0-openjdk security update
Issue Date:2013-01-16
CVE Numbers:   CVE-2013-0422
   CVE-2012-3174

was released yesterday for SL 5 and 6 .

-Connie Sieh


-Connie Sieh



-connie


Thanks!







smart card read error

2013-01-17 Thread Tom Rosmond
I am trying to configure my SL 5.5 system for smart card authentication.
I believe I have installed all the required software packages for
reading smart cards, but something still seems to be missing.  I am
using a Dell keyboard with a built in card reader, and when I insert my
card I get these messages:



Thu Jan 17 18:46:56 2013
Reader 0: Dell smart card reader keyboard 00 00
  Card state: Card inserted, 
  ATR: 3B 7D 96 00 00 80 31 80 65 B0 83 11 17 D6 83 00 90 00

Can't locate Chipcard/PCSC/Card.pm in @INC (@INC
contains: /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi 
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8
 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl 
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi 
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl 
/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .)
at /usr/local/bin/ATR_analysis line 47.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/bin/ATR_analysis line
47.
ATR_analysis '3B 7D 96 00 00 80 31 80 65 B0 83 11 17 D6 83 00 90 00':
Success

-


As near as I can tell, the problem is related to a missing perl utility,
specifically a 'pcsc_perl'.  I find many RPM's for it, but none that
refer specifically to SL or related distributions.  Does anyone have any
insights into this problem, and any other advice they can share?

T. Rosmond


TeXmacs Footnote behaviour

2013-01-17 Thread Arun Kishore
Hello, 

I have a small issue with TeXmacs footnote behaviour.
When i try to insert a footnote to a text inside a cell or a table, the
notes is not directed to the footnote area as a new number, instead it
points out to an earlier footnote as a green elongated pointer.

Is this behaviour correct ? Suggest me a correct way. 
I need the footnote be displayed as a separate entity with its footnote
numbering as 'normally displayed' even when inserted within cell or a
table.

Thanks !



-- 
Arun Kishore arunkisho...@imu.co.in