Re: Software Collections 1.0 is available for testing for SL 6

[Connie Sieh]

On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Yi Ding wrote:


Does anyone know what the "right" way to build these from SRPMs is?


Not sure why you want to rebuild since we already provide the binaries.

We will use "python27" for this example.

You have define "scl" to be "python27" when you are building the 
"python27" packages.  Or you can build "python27-1-10.el6.src.rpm" which 
will provide python27-build-1-10.el6.x86_64.rpm.  The 
python27-build-1-10.el6.x86_64.rpm package provides 
/etc/rpm/macros.python27-config which defines "scl".

---
(x86_64)# more macros.python27-config
%scl python27 
---


Then you can install python27-build-1-10.el6.x86_64.rpm .  Note you will 
have to uninstall python27-build-1-10.el6.x86_64.rpm and install another 
[package]-build which will define "scl" for that package .


Additional dependencies are scl-utils-build .

-Connie Sieh



Thanks,
Yi


On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Connie Sieh  wrote:


On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Ben wrote:

 On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:02:14AM -0500, Connie Sieh wrote:



On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Matthieu Guionnet wrote:

 thanks for this very good news !


the repository is sl-testing ! does it mean that it'll be later on main
repo sl ?
Why you don't create a new repo like you've done for devtoolset ?



It will be in the same directory tree as devtoolset when final.

 A choice from RedHat ?




?



Will you need some (good) fell-back on a specific mailing-list ?



You can send reports to this list.



Thanks for providing these packages. I installed and ran python27 &
python33 - both looked fine (didn't do any significant testing
though).

-Ben



Ben,

Thanks for testing.

-Connie Sieh

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] gtk3 ??

[Pat Riehecky]

On 10/15/2013 06:39 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:

No sign of these on pbone.net.  Am I screwed?


# rpmbuild --rebuild remmina-1.0.0-7.fc19.src.rpm
...
error: Failed build dependencies:
gtk3-devel is needed by remmina-1.0.0-7.el6.x86_64
vte3-devel is needed by remmina-1.0.0-7.el6.x86_64
libgnome-keyring-devel is needed by remmina-1.0.0-7.el6.x86_64




I would not expect GTK3 on SL6.  With careful work it could be built as 
a software collection, but I would instead ask a different question.


Can you use 'tsclient' instead of 'remmina' for your purposes? There are 
already packages for tsclient within SL6.


Pat

--
Pat Riehecky

Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/

Re: Software Collections 1.0 is available for testing for SL 6

[Connie Sieh]

On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Yi Ding wrote:


--089e01229ed41b6a8304e8f287f5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"

Thanks Connie.  I'm trying to get devtoolset-2 to build on the opensuse
build service, but haven't had much luck so far.


Devtoolset 2 is more complicated than Devtoolset 1 .  It contains a newer 
eclipse but to build that eclipse you need build dependencies from Fedora 
19 .


-Connie Sieh
 >

Cheers,
Yi


On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Connie Sieh  wrote:


On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Yi Ding wrote:

 Does anyone know what the "right" way to build these from SRPMs is?




Not sure why you want to rebuild since we already provide the binaries.

We will use "python27" for this example.

You have define "scl" to be "python27" when you are building the
"python27" packages.  Or you can build "python27-1-10.el6.src.rpm" which
will provide python27-build-1-10.el6.x86_**64.rpm.  The
python27-build-1-10.el6.x86_**64.rpm package provides
/etc/rpm/macros.python27-**config which defines "scl".
--**--**
---
(x86_64)# more macros.python27-config
%scl python27 --**
--**---

Then you can install python27-build-1-10.el6.x86_**64.rpm .  Note you
will have to uninstall python27-build-1-10.el6.x86_**64.rpm and install
another [package]-build which will define "scl" for that package .

Additional dependencies are scl-utils-build .

-Connie Sieh




Thanks,
Yi


On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Connie Sieh  wrote:

 On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Ben wrote:


 On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:02:14AM -0500, Connie Sieh wrote:



 On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Matthieu Guionnet wrote:


 thanks for this very good news !



the repository is sl-testing ! does it mean that it'll be later on
main
repo sl ?
Why you don't create a new repo like you've done for devtoolset ?



It will be in the same directory tree as devtoolset when final.

 A choice from RedHat ?





?


 Will you need some (good) fell-back on a specific mailing-list ?




You can send reports to this list.



Thanks for providing these packages. I installed and ran python27 &
python33 - both looked fine (didn't do any significant testing
though).

-Ben


 Ben,


Thanks for testing.

-Connie Sieh






--089e01229ed41b6a8304e8f287f5
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks Connie. =A0I'm trying to get devtoolset-2 to bu=
ild on the opensuse build service, but haven't had much luck so far.Cheers,Yi



On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Connie Sie=
h  wrote:
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Yi Ding wrote:


Does anyone know what the "right" way to build these from SRPMs i=
s?


Not sure why you want to rebuild since we already provide the binaries.

We will use "python27" for this example.

You have define "scl" to be "python27" when you are bui=
lding the "python27" packages. =A0Or you can build "python27=
-1-10.el6.src.rpm" which will provide python27-build-1-10.el6.x86_<=
/u>64.rpm. =A0The python27-build-1-10.el6.x86_64.rpm package provide=
s /etc/rpm/macros.python27-config which defines "scl".


-=
--
(x86_64)# more macros.python27-config
%scl python27 --=
-

Then you can install python27-build-1-10.el6.x86_64.rpm . =A0Note yo=
u will have to uninstall python27-build-1-10.el6.x86_64.rpm and inst=
all another [package]-build which will define "scl" for that pack=
age .



Additional dependencies are scl-utils-build .

-Connie Sieh



Thanks,
Yi


On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Connie Sieh cs...@fnal.gov> wrote:


On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Ben wrote:

=A0On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:02:14AM -0500, Connie Sieh wrote:



On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Matthieu Guionnet wrote:

=A0thanks for this very good news !


the repository is sl-testing ! does it mean that it'll be later on main=

repo sl ?
Why you don't create a new repo like you've done for devtoolset ?



It will be in the same directory tree as devtoolset when final.

=A0A choice from RedHat ?




?



Will you need some (good) fell-back on a specific mailing-list ?



You can send reports to this list.



Thanks for providing these packages. I installed and ran python27 &
python33 - both looked fine (didn't do any significant testing
though).

-Ben



Ben,

Thanks for testing.

-Connie Sieh






--089e01229ed41b6a8304e8f287f5--

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] gtk3 ??

[ToddAndMargo]

On 10/17/2013 09:20 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:

On 10/15/2013 06:39 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:

No sign of these on pbone.net.  Am I screwed?


# rpmbuild --rebuild remmina-1.0.0-7.fc19.src.rpm
...
error: Failed build dependencies:
gtk3-devel is needed by remmina-1.0.0-7.el6.x86_64
vte3-devel is needed by remmina-1.0.0-7.el6.x86_64
libgnome-keyring-devel is needed by remmina-1.0.0-7.el6.x86_64




I would not expect GTK3 on SL6.  With careful work it could be built as
a software collection, but I would instead ask a different question.

Can you use 'tsclient' instead of 'remmina' for your purposes? There are
already packages for tsclient within SL6.

Pat



Hi Pat,

I seem to be doing okay with Vinagre.  Remmina has more
polish, but ...

Many thanks,
-T

--
~~
Computers are like air conditioners.
They malfunction when you open windows
~~

Re: Software Collections 1.0 is available for testing for SL 6

[Yi Ding]

Thanks Connie.  I'm trying to get devtoolset-2 to build on the opensuse
build service, but haven't had much luck so far.

Cheers,
Yi


On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Connie Sieh  wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Yi Ding wrote:
>
>  Does anyone know what the "right" way to build these from SRPMs is?
>>
>
> Not sure why you want to rebuild since we already provide the binaries.
>
> We will use "python27" for this example.
>
> You have define "scl" to be "python27" when you are building the
> "python27" packages.  Or you can build "python27-1-10.el6.src.rpm" which
> will provide python27-build-1-10.el6.x86_**64.rpm.  The
> python27-build-1-10.el6.x86_**64.rpm package provides
> /etc/rpm/macros.python27-**config which defines "scl".
> --**--**
> ---
> (x86_64)# more macros.python27-config
> %scl python27 --**
> --**---
>
> Then you can install python27-build-1-10.el6.x86_**64.rpm .  Note you
> will have to uninstall python27-build-1-10.el6.x86_**64.rpm and install
> another [package]-build which will define "scl" for that package .
>
> Additional dependencies are scl-utils-build .
>
> -Connie Sieh
>
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Yi
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Connie Sieh  wrote:
>>
>>  On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Ben wrote:
>>>
>>>  On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:02:14AM -0500, Connie Sieh wrote:
>>>

  On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Matthieu Guionnet wrote:
>
>  thanks for this very good news !
>
>>
>> the repository is sl-testing ! does it mean that it'll be later on
>> main
>> repo sl ?
>> Why you don't create a new repo like you've done for devtoolset ?
>>
>>
> It will be in the same directory tree as devtoolset when final.
>
>  A choice from RedHat ?
>
>>
>>
> ?
>
>
>  Will you need some (good) fell-back on a specific mailing-list ?
>>
>>
> You can send reports to this list.
>
>
 Thanks for providing these packages. I installed and ran python27 &
 python33 - both looked fine (didn't do any significant testing
 though).

 -Ben


  Ben,
>>>
>>> Thanks for testing.
>>>
>>> -Connie Sieh
>>>
>>>
>>