Re: 9825 wireless card auto disconnects!

2010-08-30 Thread Isaac
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
William Shu wrote:

> Dear All,
> I forwarded this mail back in July buy got no reply. So I can use the
> machine, does anyone have a workaround that avoids
> changing/recompiling stock SL software/kernel? (Googling seems to
> suggest there is a fundamental problem; I lack the needed networking
> skills.)
> 
> Many thanks
> 
> William.
> 
..
> > I have an atheros 9825 wireless card (on a compaq
> > CQ60-615DX) which is detected, but somehow fails to connect
> > to -- or rather immediately disconnects immediately from --
> > the network when the password is given. I am running it
> > using linux 5.5 livedvd, but the same device connects
> > successfully under Windows7.

Atheros 9825? That sounds like it should be wireless-n, supported by
ath9k (or perhaps madwifi-hal-0.10.5.6, but don't expect the latter to
be easy).
Here's a little info:
http://madwifi-project.org/wiki/Compatibility/Atheros

I'd see whether `ifconfig wlan0 down;modprobe -r ath9k` and
`modprobe ath9k; ifconfig wlan0 up` will get it working.
If not, I'd try the CentOS 2.6.32 kernel/some RHEL6 kernel; try another
distro; or wait a little bit.

Be aware that ath9k is a work in progress.

> > 
> > It seems this issue was discussed sometime before, but I do
> > not seem to find it. Any help appreciated. Below are details
> > from wpa_supplicant.log and dmesg that I guess are helpful.
..


Re: Terrabyte file systems and SL5.0

2010-07-14 Thread Isaac
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:45:48 -0500
William Lutter  wrote:

> For the first time I will be using a 1-2 Terrabyte hard drive on any
> SL release, in particular,  on  an older SL5.0 (boron) OS.   
> 
> There's plenty on the web about pros and cons for larger file systems
> (resier, xfs, ext3, ext4, ...).   I've usually stayed with ext3
> (200-500 Gb HD that are NFS mounted to linux or windows using MS
> windows for unix).  So, vanilla; not too splashy a set up.  No
> clusters.  I've not used LVM. 
> 
> I think my question is which of these choices is as well developed,
> mature, and easy to use as ext3 for the SL5.0 boron version of SL?
> I'm most familiar with ext3 and do these stray IT tasks as needed, so
> I've not kept up on the latest and greatest.
> 
> Thanks for any comments,
> Bill Lutter

Well, ext3 will supposedly work with up to 16 TB in RHEL5, so SL should
have similar limits.
Most Linux filesystems don't have a 2 TB limit; the only FS I know of
that has a 2 TB limit is FAT32--which is extremely slow at large sizes.
Ext3 goes to 2 TB with 1kb blocks.
ReiserFS, JFS, & XFS ( which is supported by SL, but not TUV) are also
options.

So anything should work, but I can't tell what would be best.  Probably
any one of the alternatives would be faster than ext3.


Re: More on Spurious Interrupt

2010-06-25 Thread Isaac
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:16:36 -0400
Larry Linder  wrote:

> Adding "nosmp apm=force noapic api=off pci=noacpi" after a reboot of
> system appeared to work on first inspection.   Some time after reboot
> there are more interrupts and a write to /var/log/messages.   Hard on
> a disk to say the least.

> Larry Linder
I wonder if the "api=off" should be "acpi=off".  If that's what it
should be, the kernel would just ignore "api=off".


Documents about...

2010-05-10 Thread Isaac Cortés
I'd like to know if there is pdfs or something like that about this great OS