RE: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Upgrade from SL 5.3
Thanks to all who responded.
There was indeed a typo in de scientific.org documentation.
Therefor I have succeeded in upgrading to 5.11.
Also David mentioned:
Without installing the yum-conf-5x package, you can most likely do an upgrade
doing:
yum --releasever=5.11 update sl-release
yum clean all
yum update
(@Pat) I remember this was also in the documentation on the old scientific.org
website... maybe add this to the new site?
Regards,
Carel van der Werf
-Original Message-
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
[mailto:owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of Pat
Riehecky
Sent: 04 February, 2015 18:02
To: Doug Johnson; SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Upgrade from SL 5.3
Documentation updated, thanks for finding this!
Pat
On 02/04/2015 10:59 AM, Doug Johnson wrote:
Greetings,
Perhaps it is a typo in the documentation?
{root} yum search yum-conf
Loaded plugins: kernel-module, priorities
463 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Matched:
yum-conf
yum-conf.noarch : RPM installer/updater config files
yum-conf-5x.noarch : RPM installer/updater config files
yum-conf-adobe.i686 : linux.adobe.com Repository Configuration
yum-conf-adobe.x86_64 : linux.adobe.com Repository Configuration
yum-conf-elrepo.noarch : ElRepo.org Community Enterprise Linux Repository
release file
yum-conf-epel.noarch : Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux repository
configuration
But I don't use this method, so take this with a grain of salt.
Hope this helps,
doug
Hi,
I have several different releases of Scientific Linux running, and now one =
of my spare-fileservers is repowerd again
Then I found out it is still running SL 5.3, so I would like to update to 5=
.11, but ScienticfLinux.org in its FAQ only mentions:
How do I update to the latest release?
To upgrade from SL 5.5 (or any older SL 5 release) to the latest SL 5, =
simply install yum-conf-sl5x
To upgrade from SL 6.1 (or any older SL 6 release) to the latest SL 6, =
simply install yum-conf-sl6x
Upgrades between major versions (from SL 5 to SL 6, or SL 6 to SL 7) ar=
e not supported.
Starting with Scientific Linux 5.9 and Scientific Linux 6.4, the 'x' repo i=
s installed by default.
So:
# yum install yum-conf-sl5x=20
Shows:
No package yum-conf-sl5x available (from ftp1.scientificlinux.org)=20
Therefor: Is the phrase or any older SL 5 release correct ?
Regards,
Carel=20
-
Doug Johnsonemail: drj...@pizero.colorado.edu
B390, Duane Physics (303)-492-4506 Office
Boulder, CO 80309 (303)-492-5119 FAX
http://www.aaccchildren.org
http://www-hep.colorado.edu/support/fulbright
Father, father, father. We don't need to escalate
War is not the answer, 'cause only love can conquer hate.
--
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux developer
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
www.scientificlinux.org
Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Upgrade from SL 5.3
Added:
http://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/faq/faq-releases/#update-particular-release
On 02/05/2015 07:47 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
Alas, for SL 5 $releasever isn't used by the yum repos we provide.
I'll add the comment on releasever to the docs for 6 and 7 as it is a
handy command set.
Pat
On 02/05/2015 02:26 AM, Werf, C.G. van der (Carel) wrote:
Thanks to all who responded.
There was indeed a typo in de scientific.org documentation.
Therefor I have succeeded in upgrading to 5.11.
Also David mentioned:
Without installing the yum-conf-5x package, you can most likely do an
upgrade doing:
yum --releasever=5.11 update sl-release
yum clean all
yum update
(@Pat) I remember this was also in the documentation on the old
scientific.org website... maybe add this to the new site?
Regards,
Carel van der Werf
-Original Message-
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
[mailto:owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of
Pat Riehecky
Sent: 04 February, 2015 18:02
To: Doug Johnson; SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Upgrade from SL 5.3
Documentation updated, thanks for finding this!
Pat
On 02/04/2015 10:59 AM, Doug Johnson wrote:
Greetings,
Perhaps it is a typo in the documentation?
{root} yum search yum-conf
Loaded plugins: kernel-module, priorities
463 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Matched: yum-conf
yum-conf.noarch : RPM installer/updater config files
yum-conf-5x.noarch : RPM installer/updater config files
yum-conf-adobe.i686 : linux.adobe.com Repository Configuration
yum-conf-adobe.x86_64 : linux.adobe.com Repository Configuration
yum-conf-elrepo.noarch : ElRepo.org Community Enterprise Linux
Repository release file
yum-conf-epel.noarch : Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux
repository configuration
But I don't use this method, so take this with a grain of salt.
Hope this helps,
doug
Hi,
I have several different releases of Scientific Linux running, and
now one =
of my spare-fileservers is repowerd again
Then I found out it is still running SL 5.3, so I would like to
update to 5=
.11, but ScienticfLinux.org in its FAQ only mentions:
How do I update to the latest release?
To upgrade from SL 5.5 (or any older SL 5 release) to the
latest SL 5, =
simply install yum-conf-sl5x
To upgrade from SL 6.1 (or any older SL 6 release) to the
latest SL 6, =
simply install yum-conf-sl6x
Upgrades between major versions (from SL 5 to SL 6, or SL 6
to SL 7) ar=
e not supported.
Starting with Scientific Linux 5.9 and Scientific Linux 6.4, the
'x' repo i=
s installed by default.
So:
# yum install yum-conf-sl5x=20
Shows:
No package yum-conf-sl5x available (from
ftp1.scientificlinux.org)=20
Therefor: Is the phrase or any older SL 5 release correct ?
Regards,
Carel=20
-
Doug Johnsonemail: drj...@pizero.colorado.edu
B390, Duane Physics (303)-492-4506 Office
Boulder, CO 80309 (303)-492-5119 FAX
http://www.aaccchildren.org
http://www-hep.colorado.edu/support/fulbright
Father, father, father. We don't need to escalate
War is not the answer, 'cause only love can conquer hate.
--
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux developer
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
www.scientificlinux.org
Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Upgrade from SL 5.3
Alas, for SL 5 $releasever isn't used by the yum repos we provide.
I'll add the comment on releasever to the docs for 6 and 7 as it is a
handy command set.
Pat
On 02/05/2015 02:26 AM, Werf, C.G. van der (Carel) wrote:
Thanks to all who responded.
There was indeed a typo in de scientific.org documentation.
Therefor I have succeeded in upgrading to 5.11.
Also David mentioned:
Without installing the yum-conf-5x package, you can most likely do an upgrade
doing:
yum --releasever=5.11 update sl-release
yum clean all
yum update
(@Pat) I remember this was also in the documentation on the old scientific.org
website... maybe add this to the new site?
Regards,
Carel van der Werf
-Original Message-
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
[mailto:owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of Pat
Riehecky
Sent: 04 February, 2015 18:02
To: Doug Johnson; SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Upgrade from SL 5.3
Documentation updated, thanks for finding this!
Pat
On 02/04/2015 10:59 AM, Doug Johnson wrote:
Greetings,
Perhaps it is a typo in the documentation?
{root} yum search yum-conf
Loaded plugins: kernel-module, priorities
463 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Matched:
yum-conf
yum-conf.noarch : RPM installer/updater config files
yum-conf-5x.noarch : RPM installer/updater config files
yum-conf-adobe.i686 : linux.adobe.com Repository Configuration
yum-conf-adobe.x86_64 : linux.adobe.com Repository Configuration
yum-conf-elrepo.noarch : ElRepo.org Community Enterprise Linux Repository
release file
yum-conf-epel.noarch : Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux repository
configuration
But I don't use this method, so take this with a grain of salt.
Hope this helps,
doug
Hi,
I have several different releases of Scientific Linux running, and now one =
of my spare-fileservers is repowerd again
Then I found out it is still running SL 5.3, so I would like to update to 5=
.11, but ScienticfLinux.org in its FAQ only mentions:
How do I update to the latest release?
To upgrade from SL 5.5 (or any older SL 5 release) to the latest SL 5, =
simply install yum-conf-sl5x
To upgrade from SL 6.1 (or any older SL 6 release) to the latest SL 6, =
simply install yum-conf-sl6x
Upgrades between major versions (from SL 5 to SL 6, or SL 6 to SL 7) ar=
e not supported.
Starting with Scientific Linux 5.9 and Scientific Linux 6.4, the 'x' repo i=
s installed by default.
So:
# yum install yum-conf-sl5x=20
Shows:
No package yum-conf-sl5x available (from ftp1.scientificlinux.org)=20
Therefor: Is the phrase or any older SL 5 release correct ?
Regards,
Carel=20
-
Doug Johnsonemail: drj...@pizero.colorado.edu
B390, Duane Physics (303)-492-4506 Office
Boulder, CO 80309 (303)-492-5119 FAX
http://www.aaccchildren.org
http://www-hep.colorado.edu/support/fulbright
Father, father, father. We don't need to escalate
War is not the answer, 'cause only love can conquer hate.
--
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux developer
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
www.scientificlinux.org
Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Upgrade from SL 5.3
On 5 February 2015 at 13:54, Pat Riehecky riehe...@fnal.gov wrote: Added: http://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/faq/faq-releases/#update-particular-release Pat, A minor editorial adjustment is required to the above -- s/sl-releae/sl-release/ Alan.
Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Upgrade from SL 5.3
On 02/05/2015 09:21 AM, Alan Bartlett wrote: On 5 February 2015 at 13:54, Pat Riehecky riehe...@fnal.gov wrote: Added: http://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/faq/faq-releases/#update-particular-release Pat, A minor editorial adjustment is required to the above -- s/sl-releae/sl-release/ Alan. Alas. Thanks for checking up on me Alan! Should be fixed now. Pat -- Pat Riehecky Scientific Linux developer Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory www.fnal.gov www.scientificlinux.org
Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Upgrade from SL 5.3
On 5 February 2015 at 16:30, Pat Riehecky riehe...@fnal.gov wrote: On 02/05/2015 09:21 AM, Alan Bartlett wrote: Pat, A minor editorial adjustment is required to the above -- s/sl-releae/sl-release/ Alan. Alas. Thanks for checking up on me Alan! Should be fixed now. Pat Just perfect. Alan.
