Re: disk recommendations

2012-10-04 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Paul Robert Marino  wrote:
> This is actually fairly common with megaraid arrays esspecialy the ones
> oemed by dell because they tend to rush them to market before they have

Megaraid has *consistently* been a source of serious problems,
requiring firmware updates, performing very poorly with server class
operating systems that do not have last week's, not yet tested, beta
drivers, and corrupting data at unpredictable times. If ordering high
reliability equipment, I vastly prefer to go with Adaptec server class
hardware, which is somewhat mre expensive, or Rocketport, which has
been rock soled everyt time I'm privileged to use it.

> worked out all the bugs in order to try to get the lattest greatest features
> included in the spec sheet to make them seem superior to their compitition.
> Chances are you need to update the firmware on the raid controller. There is
> a fairly good chance that that 3rd box has a bad firmware revision. Updating
> the firmware to the latest version will probably fix your issue.

I've also seen some ghods-awful 3rd party repackaged, no-name  cards
that are listed in the kernel as "Adaptec" and other vendors, but if
you look carefully had burned off chip numbers and look like they were
manufactured by monkeys. Poor trace quality, poor component mounting,
extremely thin gold on the contacts, gigantic screw holes to make
assembly easier but make the mounting plates drift in alignment, etc.

You might take a look at the actual card and make sure it's not one of
these "it fell off my uncle's truck" pieces of hardware.


Re: disk recommendations

2012-10-04 Thread Graham Allan
Similar findings here, where the first batch of drives in our hadoop
clusters were WD greens. smartctl shows huge Load_Cycle_Count numbers
for those drives which have been in service for a while (and they do
indeed keep us busy with RMAs). Eventually we found this utility which
can disable the absurdly short head-park timer from within linux:

http://idle3-tools.sourceforge.net/

which might help, but I wouldn't choose to buy these drives again for
this purpose.

Graham

On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 11:07:03AM -0600, Doug Johnson wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> I have built many RAID systems using desktop disks and they are
> generally quite stable. One of the issues with WD drives are with their
> Green drives. By default, they park the heads after ~8 seconds of
> inactivity. This will cause them to drop out of the array. The disk
> firmware can be configured to disable this feature. I have had very good
> luck with Samsung and Seagate drives. I have never spent the money on
> Enterprise level drives.
> 
> BTW: The head parking feature is notoriously bad. If you calculate 1
> park every 8 seconds. At constant usage, the drive will die in about 3
> months. Perhaps this feature is fine for a desktop, but it is not for a
> server or production environment.
-- 
-
Graham Allan - I.T. Manager - al...@physics.umn.edu - (612) 624-5040
School of Physics and Astronomy - University of Minnesota
-


RE: disk recommendations

2012-10-04 Thread James M Pulver
I found that especially bad via USB adapters for the WD Green disks. For a 6 
disk array. For 2 Disk via eSATA, works OK so far, but I really would stay away 
from the "green" disks for RAID.

--
James Pulver
LEPP Computer Group
Cornell University


-Original Message-
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov 
[mailto:owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of Doug 
Johnson
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 1:07 PM
To: Steven Timm
Cc: Ken Teh; scientific-linux-users
Subject: Re: disk recommendations

Greetings,

I have built many RAID systems using desktop disks and they are
generally quite stable. One of the issues with WD drives are with their
Green drives. By default, they park the heads after ~8 seconds of
inactivity. This will cause them to drop out of the array. The disk
firmware can be configured to disable this feature. I have had very good
luck with Samsung and Seagate drives. I have never spent the money on
Enterprise level drives.

BTW: The head parking feature is notoriously bad. If you calculate 1
park every 8 seconds. At constant usage, the drive will die in about 3
months. Perhaps this feature is fine for a desktop, but it is not for a
server or production environment.

Good luck,
doug


> 
> My understanding is that the main difference between desktop drives
> and enterprise raid array drives in this regard is that the drive firmware
> is configured to retry errors a lot longer on the desktop drives.
> It is also my experience, although it was a few years ago on older
> model WD drives, that the main thing that would produce problems of
> disk drives dropping out of the array (desktop or enterprise)
> is unexpected vibration of one kind or another.  Easy for harmonics
> to build up between the fans and the drive heads.
> We have several Megaraid 9260-i controllers (and their successors and 
> their predecessors) in production but we did spend the money for the 
> enterprise drives.
> 
> Steve Timm
> 
> 
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Ken Teh wrote:
> 
> > I've run into problems trying to use desktop disks in a RAID array with a 
> > MegaRAID 9260-8i.  I built 2 previous systems with desktop disks and did 
> > not 
> > have any problems but I've been unable to get this 3rd system to function 
> > stably.  Disks dropped from the array except the disks are fine which I 
> > proved by deleting the disk group and starting again.
> >
> > This behaviour is consistent with Western Digital's discussion about TLER 
> > (time-limited error recovery) and their admonition to use enterprise disks 
> > instead of desktop disks.
> >
> > I was wondering if there are ways of getting around this problem without 
> > having to buy another set of disks.  Googling suggests some options to try 
> > but I thought I'd used the list as a sounding board first before embarking 
> > on 
> > options.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> 
> --
> Steven C. Timm, Ph.D  (630) 840-8525
> t...@fnal.gov  http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/
> Fermilab Computing Division, Scientific Computing Facilities,
> Grid Facilities Department, FermiGrid Services Group, Group Leader.
> Lead of FermiCloud project.
> 

 
   Doug Johnsonemail: drj...@pizero.colorado.edu
   B390, Duane Physics (303)-492-4506 Office 
   Boulder, CO 80309   (303)-492-5119 FAX
   http://www.aaccchildren.org   
   Being right is not a justification for being rude.
   In fact, there are no justifications for being rude.



Re: disk recommendations

2012-10-04 Thread Doug Johnson
Greetings,

I have built many RAID systems using desktop disks and they are
generally quite stable. One of the issues with WD drives are with their
Green drives. By default, they park the heads after ~8 seconds of
inactivity. This will cause them to drop out of the array. The disk
firmware can be configured to disable this feature. I have had very good
luck with Samsung and Seagate drives. I have never spent the money on
Enterprise level drives.

BTW: The head parking feature is notoriously bad. If you calculate 1
park every 8 seconds. At constant usage, the drive will die in about 3
months. Perhaps this feature is fine for a desktop, but it is not for a
server or production environment.

Good luck,
doug


> 
> My understanding is that the main difference between desktop drives
> and enterprise raid array drives in this regard is that the drive firmware
> is configured to retry errors a lot longer on the desktop drives.
> It is also my experience, although it was a few years ago on older
> model WD drives, that the main thing that would produce problems of
> disk drives dropping out of the array (desktop or enterprise)
> is unexpected vibration of one kind or another.  Easy for harmonics
> to build up between the fans and the drive heads.
> We have several Megaraid 9260-i controllers (and their successors and 
> their predecessors) in production but we did spend the money for the 
> enterprise drives.
> 
> Steve Timm
> 
> 
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Ken Teh wrote:
> 
> > I've run into problems trying to use desktop disks in a RAID array with a 
> > MegaRAID 9260-8i.  I built 2 previous systems with desktop disks and did 
> > not 
> > have any problems but I've been unable to get this 3rd system to function 
> > stably.  Disks dropped from the array except the disks are fine which I 
> > proved by deleting the disk group and starting again.
> >
> > This behaviour is consistent with Western Digital's discussion about TLER 
> > (time-limited error recovery) and their admonition to use enterprise disks 
> > instead of desktop disks.
> >
> > I was wondering if there are ways of getting around this problem without 
> > having to buy another set of disks.  Googling suggests some options to try 
> > but I thought I'd used the list as a sounding board first before embarking 
> > on 
> > options.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> 
> --
> Steven C. Timm, Ph.D  (630) 840-8525
> t...@fnal.gov  http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/
> Fermilab Computing Division, Scientific Computing Facilities,
> Grid Facilities Department, FermiGrid Services Group, Group Leader.
> Lead of FermiCloud project.
> 

 
   Doug Johnsonemail: drj...@pizero.colorado.edu
   B390, Duane Physics (303)-492-4506 Office 
   Boulder, CO 80309   (303)-492-5119 FAX
   http://www.aaccchildren.org   
   Being right is not a justification for being rude.
   In fact, there are no justifications for being rude.



Re: disk recommendations

2012-10-04 Thread Steven Timm

My understanding is that the main difference between desktop drives
and enterprise raid array drives in this regard is that the drive firmware
is configured to retry errors a lot longer on the desktop drives.
It is also my experience, although it was a few years ago on older
model WD drives, that the main thing that would produce problems of
disk drives dropping out of the array (desktop or enterprise)
is unexpected vibration of one kind or another.  Easy for harmonics
to build up between the fans and the drive heads.
We have several Megaraid 9260-i controllers (and their successors and 
their predecessors) in production but we did spend the money for the 
enterprise drives.


Steve Timm


On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Ken Teh wrote:

I've run into problems trying to use desktop disks in a RAID array with a 
MegaRAID 9260-8i.  I built 2 previous systems with desktop disks and did not 
have any problems but I've been unable to get this 3rd system to function 
stably.  Disks dropped from the array except the disks are fine which I 
proved by deleting the disk group and starting again.


This behaviour is consistent with Western Digital's discussion about TLER 
(time-limited error recovery) and their admonition to use enterprise disks 
instead of desktop disks.


I was wondering if there are ways of getting around this problem without 
having to buy another set of disks.  Googling suggests some options to try 
but I thought I'd used the list as a sounding board first before embarking on 
options.


Thanks!



--
Steven C. Timm, Ph.D  (630) 840-8525
t...@fnal.gov  http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/
Fermilab Computing Division, Scientific Computing Facilities,
Grid Facilities Department, FermiGrid Services Group, Group Leader.
Lead of FermiCloud project.