[RE][scifinoir2] Alan Moore, author of "Watchmen," reinvented the comic book

2009-03-07 Thread Martin Baxter
If ever should I waver in my determination *not* to watch this flick, I'll hold 
Moore's own words as a reminder.





-[ Received Mail Content ]--

 Subject : [scifinoir2] Alan Moore, author of "Watchmen," reinvented the comic 
book

 Date : Sat, 07 Mar 2009 22:12:01 -

 From : "ravenadal" 

 To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com


www.chicagotribune.com/features/booksmags/chi-0307-mooremar07,0,4692358.story

chicagotribune.com

Alan Moore, author of "Watchmen," reinvented the comic book

By Christopher Borrelli and Robert K. Elder

Tribune reporters

March 7, 2009


Over the past 30 years, author Alan Moore has almost single-handedly reinvented 
the comic book, transforming its language, broadening its scope and deepening 
its intellect. So, naturally, Hollywood has been poaching his stories for 
years, the most egregious being the 2003 loud and dumb adaptation of his 
otherwise highly literate "The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen."

There also have been films based on his works, such as "Constantine," "From 
Hell" and a glossy but tonally faithful version of "V for Vendetta"; both last 
year's "The Dark Knight" and Tim Burton's original " Batman" owe a debt to 
Moore's "Batman: The Killing Joke."

This weekend, however, we get director Zack Snyder's sprawling adaptation of " 
Watchmen," Moore's most celebrated creation. Initially a 12-issue series with 
artist Dave Gibbons, the collected volume has become one of the most acclaimed 
graphic novels ever, hailed by Time magazine as one of the best 100 novels of 
the 20th Century. It's about aging superheroes, nuclear politics and social 
engineering.

That said, Moore has sworn off movie profits inspired by his books; he recently 
told the Los Angeles Times that he is opposed to movies based on his work. 
About "Watchmen" he said, "I will be spitting venom all over it for months to 
come." As with most of his comics, Moore has insisted "Watchmen" is "inherently 
unfilmable," heresy in this time of inevitable big-screen adaptation.

But he's right.

Comics are comics, period, with a language and tradition of their own. They are 
unique and separate from other art forms, not merely a series of detailed 
storyboards waiting to be translated into a film. Just as great literature is 
no promise of a great movie, great comic books don't automatically make better 
comic-book movies. Ask Frank Miller, Moore's American counterpart, whose Batman 
tale "The Dark Knight Returns" was released around the same time as "Watchmen" 
and became just as much of a classic. Though Hollywood has been good to Miller, 
with faithful adaptations of "300" and "Sin City," Miller's own directorial 
take on artist Will Eisner's creation, " The Spirit," released a few months 
ago, was not only unfaithful, but also murderous to the original.

With Moore, the text matters. The page matters. The context matters.

At his best, Moore is a deconstructionist, ideally suited to an age when we're 
so familiar with the history and spandex and capes that mark the superhero form 
that we prefer to go straight to the deconstruction. Moore tears apart iconic 
scenarios and cliches to rebuild and rework, as he did with "Top 10," a 
1999-2001 comic-book series about super cops in a city where everyone from the 
prostitutes to the hot dog vendors are super, and therefore, no one is. 
Likewise, "Tom Strong," another millennial series, was a thinly veiled work of 
" Superman" criticism, about a strong man tone deaf to his actions, told in the 
earnest voice of early comics.

Not that Moore is squarely rooted in superhero boots. "From Hell," his Jack the 
Ripper opus, created from 19991 to 1996, is impossible to digest fully on a 
first reading. It is a doorstop of a black-and-white narrative and not the 
mystery you expect; it is less curious about the identity of the killer than 
the why and how of his acts. A signature of Moore's work is how attuned it is 
to the paranoia peeking from behind the most upstanding facade, and how it 
treats the most monstrous.

But there's also a British cheekiness about Moore, 54, who claims to be a 
recluse. There's a playful fussiness to him that, at worst, comes off like a 
teenage affectation—the muddled philosophical arguments driving the story of 
muddled anarchists in "V for Vendetta," for instance. He is also a cultural 
treasure chest, spilling over with connections that mash up a century of 
literature to create something new that honors the old.

"The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen," which finds Mina Harker (of Bram 
Stoker's "Dracula") teaming up with the Invisible Man and Captain Nemo, has 
nods to contemporary relevance, detours into Orwellian London, but never 
forgets the simple exhilaration of a Victorian adventure.

The quintessential Moore, of course, remains "Watchmen," about which much ink 
has been spilled and no less than three new books have been released that are 
tied to the film adaptation: "Watchmen: The Art of the Film" and 

Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Alan Moore, author of "Watchmen," reinvented the comic book

2009-03-07 Thread Bosco Bosco
It should be noted that Alan Moore may be the single worst suited author in the 
history of writing to judge screen adaptations of his own work. His self 
destructive lunacy is legendary.

Bosco

--- On Sat, 3/7/09, Martin Baxter  wrote:

From: Martin Baxter 
Subject: [RE][scifinoir2] Alan Moore, author of "Watchmen," reinvented the 
comic book
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, March 7, 2009, 7:35 PM












   If ever should I waver in my determination *not* to watch this 
flick, I'll hold Moore's own words as a reminder.





-[ Received Mail Content ]--

 Subject : [scifinoir2] Alan Moore, author of "Watchmen," reinvented the comic 
book

 Date : Sat, 07 Mar 2009 22:12:01 -

 From : "ravenadal" 

 To : scifino...@yahoogro ups.com



www.chicagotribune. com/features/ booksmags/ chi-0307- mooremar07, 0,4692358. 
story



chicagotribune. com



Alan Moore, author of "Watchmen," reinvented the comic book



By Christopher Borrelli and Robert K. Elder



Tribune reporters



March 7, 2009





Over the past 30 years, author Alan Moore has almost single-handedly reinvented 
the comic book, transforming its language, broadening its scope and deepening 
its intellect. So, naturally, Hollywood has been poaching his stories for 
years, the most egregious being the 2003 loud and dumb adaptation of his 
otherwise highly literate "The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen."



There also have been films based on his works, such as "Constantine, " "From 
Hell" and a glossy but tonally faithful version of "V for Vendetta"; both last 
year's "The Dark Knight" and Tim Burton's original " Batman" owe a debt to 
Moore's "Batman: The Killing Joke."



This weekend, however, we get director Zack Snyder's sprawling adaptation of " 
Watchmen," Moore's most celebrated creation. Initially a 12-issue series with 
artist Dave Gibbons, the collected volume has become one of the most acclaimed 
graphic novels ever, hailed by Time magazine as one of the best 100 novels of 
the 20th Century. It's about aging superheroes, nuclear politics and social 
engineering.



That said, Moore has sworn off movie profits inspired by his books; he recently 
told the Los Angeles Times that he is opposed to movies based on his work. 
About "Watchmen" he said, "I will be spitting venom all over it for months to 
come." As with most of his comics, Moore has insisted "Watchmen" is "inherently 
unfilmable," heresy in this time of inevitable big-screen adaptation.



But he's right.



Comics are comics, period, with a language and tradition of their own. They are 
unique and separate from other art forms, not merely a series of detailed 
storyboards waiting to be translated into a film. Just as great literature is 
no promise of a great movie, great comic books don't automatically make better 
comic-book movies. Ask Frank Miller, Moore's American counterpart, whose Batman 
tale "The Dark Knight Returns" was released around the same time as "Watchmen" 
and became just as much of a classic. Though Hollywood has been good to Miller, 
with faithful adaptations of "300" and "Sin City," Miller's own directorial 
take on artist Will Eisner's creation, " The Spirit," released a few months 
ago, was not only unfaithful, but also murderous to the original.



With Moore, the text matters. The page matters. The context matters.



At his best, Moore is a deconstructionist, ideally suited to an age when we're 
so familiar with the history and spandex and capes that mark the superhero form 
that we prefer to go straight to the deconstruction. Moore tears apart iconic 
scenarios and cliches to rebuild and rework, as he did with "Top 10," a 
1999-2001 comic-book series about super cops in a city where everyone from the 
prostitutes to the hot dog vendors are super, and therefore, no one is. 
Likewise, "Tom Strong," another millennial series, was a thinly veiled work of 
" Superman" criticism, about a strong man tone deaf to his actions, told in the 
earnest voice of early comics.



Not that Moore is squarely rooted in superhero boots. "From Hell," his Jack the 
Ripper opus, created from 19991 to 1996, is impossible to digest fully on a 
first reading. It is a doorstop of a black-and-white narrative and not the 
mystery you expect; it is less curious about the identity of the killer than 
the why and how of his acts. A signature of Moore's work is how attuned it is 
to the paranoia peeking from behind the most upstanding facade, and how it 
treats the most monstrous.



But there's also a British cheekiness about Moore, 54, who claims to be a 
recluse. There's a playful fussiness to him