RE: [scifinoir2] Marvel honcho on War Machine cancellation

2009-09-29 Thread Martin Baxter

I just had a horrible thought.

A "Quantum Armor" mini-series. Rhodey's armor sends him leaping uncontrollably 
throught the entire past of the Marvel Universe, helping heroes at critical 
times in history.

Martin (again bemoaning ack of vomiting smileys)

"If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director?" -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: ravena...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:23:04 +0000
Subject: [scifinoir2] Marvel honcho on War Machine cancellation















 





  http://nauluz.notlong.com



Quesada on War Machine cancellation and the characters future.



For those of you who missed the announcement (like me) they are canceling War 
Machine.   In this week Cup O' Joe Marvel head honcho goes into the details and 
the future of the character.



"Why Cancel War machine? Why not put a Big artist on the book to attract 
attention why not try a little harder to move him from behind Tony Starks 
shadow and establish him as his own character by putting him on an Avengers 
book or something?"



Joe Quesada: Here's the skinny  when you ask, why not just put a BIG artist on 
the book to attract attention, you make it sound like we operate under a 
business practice that just tells creators what they have to do as opposed to 
what they like to work on. Also, let me add that Leo Manco is an AMAZING artist 
and has done the work of his life on "WM," and Greg Pak is one of the 
industry's top writers, so we put some of our best creative talent on the 
title. However, in the case of "War Machine," much like "Runaways," we're 
retooling and eventually looking to relaunch the book in a way that will garner 
it some extra attention and hopefully some added readers. We've done this quite 
successfully in the past, "Runaways" and "She-Hulk" being perfect examples of 
this, and also, while I'm not at liberty to say this, with War Machine, we have 
some very big plans that have been put into motion, but you'll have to wait a 
bit to find out what those are. What I can say is that my gut tells me you're 
going to be seeing more of Jim Rhodes doing his thing, than you ever thought 
possible.





 

  













  
_
Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage limits.
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Storage?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Storage_062009

RE: [scifinoir2] Marvel honcho on War Machine cancellation

2009-09-29 Thread Martin Baxter

Harp away, Keith!

I really don't read either of those books, so reading your post was nothing 
short of a revelation. To paraphrase J Anthony Brown, 
"Not-so-hiddennn racism..."

"If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director?" -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:45:41 +0000
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel honcho on War Machine cancellation















 





  
I tried to read War Machine, but I didn't like the tone of the books. I get 
that the tone reflects the title, but it's too much about full-on battles and 
bullets for me. The other, more important thing I don't like is what's been 
done to Rhodes himself: another cyborg. I don't know when or how this happened, 
but Rhodes is essentially part of his armor, a scarred and mutilated man who 
needs a charge from the armor in order to survice. (Kinda puts a damper on the 
love life).

I may harp on this too much for some, but I really am tired of black male 
characters being deformed or changed in some way. The years have given us 
Cyborg, Black Racer, Spawn, Geordi on TNG, etc. So when I pick up recent copies 
of Iron Man, and then War Machine, I grimaced when seeing Rhodey's skeletal, 
cyborg face, thought "nothing happening here" when i saw the lovely Asian 
doctor working with him. Odd that Tony Stark's great change took the place of 
being "infected" with a techno-organic thing called "Extremis", which turned 
him into a living organic suit of armor--yet all the change was invisible to 
the eye. The Extremis tech enhanced Stark, but did so without making him look 
like a creature.

So for me, change means given Rhodey a human body again (evidently Stark was 
working on a new body last I checked, and Norman Osborn took), give him a more 
balanced life aside from that of a man of war, and make him more of a human 
than simply a machine.
- Original Message -
From: "Kelwyn" 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 6:23:04 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [scifinoir2] Marvel honcho on War Machine cancellation







 





  http://nauluz.notlong.com



Quesada on War Machine cancellation and the characters future.



For those of you who missed the announcement (like me) they are canceling War 
Machine.   In this week Cup O' Joe Marvel head honcho goes into the details and 
the future of the character.



"Why Cancel War machine? Why not put a Big artist on the book to attract 
attention why not try a little harder to move him from behind Tony Starks 
shadow and establish him as his own character by putting him on an Avengers 
book or something?"



Joe Quesada: Here's the skinny  when you ask, why not just put a BIG artist on 
the book to attract attention, you make it sound like we operate under a 
business practice that just tells creators what they have to do as opposed to 
what they like to work on. Also, let me add that Leo Manco is an AMAZING artist 
and has done the work of his life on "WM," and Greg Pak is one of the 
industry's top writers, so we put some of our best creative talent on the 
title. However, in the case of "War Machine," much like "Runaways," we're 
retooling and eventually looking to relaunch the book in a way that will garner 
it some extra attention and hopefully some added readers. We've done this quite 
successfully in the past, "Runaways" and "She-Hulk" being perfect examples of 
this, and also, while I'm not at liberty to say this, with War Machine, we have 
some very big plans that have been put into motion, but you'll have to wait a 
bit to find out what those are. What I can say is that my gut tells me you're 
going to be seeing more of Jim Rhodes doing his thing, than you ever thought 
possible.





 

  












 

  













  
_
Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that’s right for you.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/choosepc/?ocid=ftp_val_wl_290

Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel honcho on War Machine cancellation

2009-09-28 Thread Justin Mohareb
Refrigerators in Negros?

Justin

On 9/28/09, Keith Johnson  wrote:
> I tried to read War Machine, but I didn't like the tone of the books. I get
> that the tone reflects the title, but it's too much about full-on battles
> and bullets for me. The other, more important thing I don't like is what's
> been done to Rhodes himself: another cyborg. I don't know when or how this
> happened, but Rhodes is essentially part of his armor, a scarred and
> mutilated man who needs a charge from the armor in order to survice. (Kinda
> puts a damper on the love life).
>
> I may harp on this too much for some, but I really am tired of black male
> characters being deformed or changed in some way. The years have given us
> Cyborg, Black Racer, Spawn, Geordi on TNG, etc. So when I pick up recent
> copies of Iron Man, and then War Machine, I grimaced when seeing Rhodey's
> skeletal, cyborg face, thought "nothing happening here" when i saw the
> lovely Asian doctor working with him. Odd that Tony Stark's great change
> took the place of being "infected" with a techno-organic thing called
> "Extremis", which turned him into a living organic suit of armor--yet all
> the change was invisible to the eye. The Extremis tech enhanced Stark, but
> did so without making him look like a creature.
>
> So for me, change means given Rhodey a human body again (evidently Stark was
> working on a new body last I checked, and Norman Osborn took), give him a
> more balanced life aside from that of a man of war, and make him more of a
> human than simply a machine.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kelwyn" 
> To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 6:23:04 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: [scifinoir2] Marvel honcho on War Machine cancellation
>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://nauluz.notlong.com
>
> Quesada on War Machine cancellation and the characters future.
>
> For those of you who missed the announcement (like me) they are canceling
> War Machine. In this week Cup O' Joe Marvel head honcho goes into the
> details and the future of the character.
>
> "Why Cancel War machine? Why not put a Big artist on the book to attract
> attention why not try a little harder to move him from behind Tony Starks
> shadow and establish him as his own character by putting him on an Avengers
> book or something?"
>
> Joe Quesada: Here's the skinny when you ask, why not just put a BIG artist
> on the book to attract attention, you make it sound like we operate under a
> business practice that just tells creators what they have to do as opposed
> to what they like to work on. Also, let me add that Leo Manco is an AMAZING
> artist and has done the work of his life on "WM," and Greg Pak is one of the
> industry's top writers, so we put some of our best creative talent on the
> title. However, in the case of "War Machine," much like "Runaways," we're
> retooling and eventually looking to relaunch the book in a way that will
> garner it some extra attention and hopefully some added readers. We've done
> this quite successfully in the past, "Runaways" and "She-Hulk" being perfect
> examples of this, and also, while I'm not at liberty to say this, with War
> Machine, we have some very big plans that have been put into motion, but
> you'll have to wait a bit to find out what those are. What I can say is that
> my gut tells me you're going to be seeing more of Jim Rhodes doing his
> thing, than you ever thought possible.
>
>
>


-- 
Read the Bitter Guide to the Bitter Guy.
http://thebitterguy.livejournal.com


Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel honcho on War Machine cancellation

2009-09-28 Thread Keith Johnson
I tried to read War Machine, but I didn't like the tone of the books. I get 
that the tone reflects the title, but it's too much about full-on battles and 
bullets for me. The other, more important thing I don't like is what's been 
done to Rhodes himself: another cyborg. I don't know when or how this happened, 
but Rhodes is essentially part of his armor, a scarred and mutilated man who 
needs a charge from the armor in order to survice. (Kinda puts a damper on the 
love life). 

I may harp on this too much for some, but I really am tired of black male 
characters being deformed or changed in some way. The years have given us 
Cyborg, Black Racer, Spawn, Geordi on TNG, etc. So when I pick up recent copies 
of Iron Man, and then War Machine, I grimaced when seeing Rhodey's skeletal, 
cyborg face, thought "nothing happening here" when i saw the lovely Asian 
doctor working with him. Odd that Tony Stark's great change took the place of 
being "infected" with a techno-organic thing called "Extremis", which turned 
him into a living organic suit of armor--yet all the change was invisible to 
the eye. The Extremis tech enhanced Stark, but did so without making him look 
like a creature. 

So for me, change means given Rhodey a human body again (evidently Stark was 
working on a new body last I checked, and Norman Osborn took), give him a more 
balanced life aside from that of a man of war, and make him more of a human 
than simply a machine. 
- Original Message - 
From: "Kelwyn"  
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 6:23:04 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [scifinoir2] Marvel honcho on War Machine cancellation 






http://nauluz.notlong.com 

Quesada on War Machine cancellation and the characters future. 

For those of you who missed the announcement (like me) they are canceling War 
Machine. In this week Cup O' Joe Marvel head honcho goes into the details and 
the future of the character. 

"Why Cancel War machine? Why not put a Big artist on the book to attract 
attention why not try a little harder to move him from behind Tony Starks 
shadow and establish him as his own character by putting him on an Avengers 
book or something?" 

Joe Quesada: Here's the skinny when you ask, why not just put a BIG artist on 
the book to attract attention, you make it sound like we operate under a 
business practice that just tells creators what they have to do as opposed to 
what they like to work on. Also, let me add that Leo Manco is an AMAZING artist 
and has done the work of his life on "WM," and Greg Pak is one of the 
industry's top writers, so we put some of our best creative talent on the 
title. However, in the case of "War Machine," much like "Runaways," we're 
retooling and eventually looking to relaunch the book in a way that will garner 
it some extra attention and hopefully some added readers. We've done this quite 
successfully in the past, "Runaways" and "She-Hulk" being perfect examples of 
this, and also, while I'm not at liberty to say this, with War Machine, we have 
some very big plans that have been put into motion, but you'll have to wait a 
bit to find out what those are. What I can say is that my gut tells me you're 
going to be seeing more of Jim Rhodes doing his thing, than you ever thought 
possible. 




[scifinoir2] Marvel honcho on War Machine cancellation

2009-09-28 Thread Kelwyn
http://nauluz.notlong.com

Quesada on War Machine cancellation and the characters future.

For those of you who missed the announcement (like me) they are canceling War 
Machine.   In this week Cup O' Joe Marvel head honcho goes into the details and 
the future of the character.

"Why Cancel War machine? Why not put a Big artist on the book to attract 
attention why not try a little harder to move him from behind Tony Starks 
shadow and establish him as his own character by putting him on an Avengers 
book or something?"

Joe Quesada: Here's the skinny  when you ask, why not just put a BIG artist 
on the book to attract attention, you make it sound like we operate under a 
business practice that just tells creators what they have to do as opposed to 
what they like to work on. Also, let me add that Leo Manco is an AMAZING artist 
and has done the work of his life on "WM," and Greg Pak is one of the 
industry's top writers, so we put some of our best creative talent on the 
title. However, in the case of "War Machine," much like "Runaways," we're 
retooling and eventually looking to relaunch the book in a way that will garner 
it some extra attention and hopefully some added readers. We've done this quite 
successfully in the past, "Runaways" and "She-Hulk" being perfect examples of 
this, and also, while I'm not at liberty to say this, with War Machine, we have 
some very big plans that have been put into motion, but you'll have to wait a 
bit to find out what those are. What I can say is that my gut tells me you're 
going to be seeing more of Jim Rhodes doing his thing, than you ever thought 
possible.