Re: [scifinoir2] Tomb Raider Franchise to Get Reboot--Without Jolie?

2009-01-31 Thread Dax
I have heard for years that they have been trying to make a Wonder Woman 
movie. Personally, I have always thought that Terry Farrell could or would 
make a great Wonder Woman. But I have heard that she was not considered for 
the part due to the fact that she was too tall. But I feel that it wouldn't 
be the first time movies was not true to the comics.
--Lavender
People may lie, but the evidence rarely does.

--
From: Daryle Lockhart dar...@darylelockhart.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 3:03 PM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Tomb Raider Franchise to Get Reboot--Without 
Jolie?

 Megan Fox's management  has said she's not involved in this movie at
 all -- yet.

 File this under Wonder Woman. The studios are trying to  figure out
 who the hottest  actress in Hollywood is. Instead of just  asking the
 bloggers ( they  know everybody)  they're going through this and
 reading the results.

 On Jan 28, 2009, at 2:50 PM, keithbjohn...@comcast.net wrote:

 Sad thing is, I didn't think the Tomb Raider movies were that bad.
 Forgettable, perhaps, but not junk like what's served up on SciFi.
 Indeed, there were the basics of good movies here: Jolie's presence
 (she can play borderline psycho/aggressive like nobody), decent
 directing, and guest stars a cut above the norm in scifi/adventure
 movies (Daniel Craig, Jon Voight, Gerard Butler, Djimon Honsou).
 Indeed, as I've seen a billion times, the second flick made me
 think Jolie had the chops to start a real spy movie franchise.
 I always wanted the writers to tweak the stories and make it
 something more solid.

 I haven't seen anything to make me think Meagan Fox can act as well
 as Jolie even in a throwaway action flick, and the directional
 change worries me. I fear we'll end up with something even more
 forgettable: complete American-style over-the-top action and
 violence with crazy camera angles, devoid of anything remotely
 interesting. In short, something on the level of Resident Evil or
 the increasingly stupid Transporter movies.

 Oh well, such is life. I'm more anxious to see Vin Diesel tweak the
 Chronicles of Riddick thing and bring a sequel movie our way...

 

 [ AP ]

 Angelina Jolie's loss may just be Megan Fox's gain.

 Warner Bros. has confirmed plans to relaunch-and completely
 overhaul-the hot pants-wearing, artifact-collecting Lara Croft:
 Tomb Raider franchise, with the first major casualty being Jolie.

 According to the Hollywood Reporter, the third film will completely
 reboot the video game-based character, including changing her
 origin story (most likely shying away from her English aristocracy
 roots) and introduce new kinds of missions, love interests and
 villains.

 And, most notably, a new leading lady.

 While producers say an actress likely won't be cast until a writer
 and director have signed on, Fox has emerged as the frontrunner
 replacement, at least as far as the blogosphere is concerned.

 While Lara Croft: Tomb Raider and its inconsistently punctuated
 sequel Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life were produced by
 Paramount, the rights to the series have since reverted back to
 video game purveyor Eidos. In December, Time Warner increased its
 stake in the multimedia company, ensuring in-house studio Warner
 Bros. first dibs to what has been a lucrative, abeit critically
 panned, franchise.

 The first installment, released in 2001, grossed $275 million
 worldwide, while the 2003 sequel earned $157 million. All told, the
 video game series, which launched in 1996, has accounted for more
 than $1 billion.

 

 Post your SciFiNoir Profile at
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add?
 fmvn=mapYahoo! Groups Links





 

 Post your SciFiNoir Profile at
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add?fmvn=mapYahoo!
  
 Groups Links



 


Re: [scifinoir2] Tomb Raider Franchise to Get Reboot--Without Jolie?

2009-01-31 Thread KeithBJohnson
To my best knowledge, Diana is somewhere around 5'10 - 5'11. Terry Farrell is 
right at six feet. Not much of a stretch at all...

 -- Original message --
From: Dax nx_31...@yahoo.com
 I have heard for years that they have been trying to make a Wonder Woman 
 movie. Personally, I have always thought that Terry Farrell could or would 
 make a great Wonder Woman. But I have heard that she was not considered for 
 the part due to the fact that she was too tall. But I feel that it wouldn't 
 be the first time movies was not true to the comics.
 --Lavender
 People may lie, but the evidence rarely does.
 
 --
 From: Daryle Lockhart dar...@darylelockhart.com
 Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 3:03 PM
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Tomb Raider Franchise to Get Reboot--Without 
 Jolie?
 
  Megan Fox's management  has said she's not involved in this movie at
  all -- yet.
 
  File this under Wonder Woman. The studios are trying to  figure out
  who the hottest  actress in Hollywood is. Instead of just  asking the
  bloggers ( they  know everybody)  they're going through this and
  reading the results.
 
  On Jan 28, 2009, at 2:50 PM, keithbjohn...@comcast.net wrote:
 
  Sad thing is, I didn't think the Tomb Raider movies were that bad.
  Forgettable, perhaps, but not junk like what's served up on SciFi.
  Indeed, there were the basics of good movies here: Jolie's presence
  (she can play borderline psycho/aggressive like nobody), decent
  directing, and guest stars a cut above the norm in scifi/adventure
  movies (Daniel Craig, Jon Voight, Gerard Butler, Djimon Honsou).
  Indeed, as I've seen a billion times, the second flick made me
  think Jolie had the chops to start a real spy movie franchise.
  I always wanted the writers to tweak the stories and make it
  something more solid.
 
  I haven't seen anything to make me think Meagan Fox can act as well
  as Jolie even in a throwaway action flick, and the directional
  change worries me. I fear we'll end up with something even more
  forgettable: complete American-style over-the-top action and
  violence with crazy camera angles, devoid of anything remotely
  interesting. In short, something on the level of Resident Evil or
  the increasingly stupid Transporter movies.
 
  Oh well, such is life. I'm more anxious to see Vin Diesel tweak the
  Chronicles of Riddick thing and bring a sequel movie our way...
 
  
 
  [ AP ]
 
  Angelina Jolie's loss may just be Megan Fox's gain.
 
  Warner Bros. has confirmed plans to relaunch-and completely
  overhaul-the hot pants-wearing, artifact-collecting Lara Croft:
  Tomb Raider franchise, with the first major casualty being Jolie.
 
  According to the Hollywood Reporter, the third film will completely
  reboot the video game-based character, including changing her
  origin story (most likely shying away from her English aristocracy
  roots) and introduce new kinds of missions, love interests and
  villains.
 
  And, most notably, a new leading lady.
 
  While producers say an actress likely won't be cast until a writer
  and director have signed on, Fox has emerged as the frontrunner
  replacement, at least as far as the blogosphere is concerned.
 
  While Lara Croft: Tomb Raider and its inconsistently punctuated
  sequel Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life were produced by
  Paramount, the rights to the series have since reverted back to
  video game purveyor Eidos. In December, Time Warner increased its
  stake in the multimedia company, ensuring in-house studio Warner
  Bros. first dibs to what has been a lucrative, abeit critically
  panned, franchise.
 
  The first installment, released in 2001, grossed $275 million
  worldwide, while the 2003 sequel earned $157 million. All told, the
  video game series, which launched in 1996, has accounted for more
  than $1 billion.
 
  
 
  Post your SciFiNoir Profile at
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add?
  fmvn=mapYahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  Post your SciFiNoir Profile at
  
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add?fmvn=mapYahoo!
  
  Groups Links
 
 
 
  


---BeginMessage---













I have heard for years that they have been trying to make a Wonder Woman 
movie. Personally, I have always thought that Terry Farrell could or would 
make a great Wonder Woman. But I have heard that she was not considered for 
the part due to the fact that she was too tall. But I feel that it wouldn't 
be the first time movies was not true to the comics.
--Lavender
People may lie, but the evidence rarely does.

--
From: Daryle Lockhart dar...@darylelockhart.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 3:03 PM
To: scifino...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2

Re: [scifinoir2] Tomb Raider Franchise to Get Reboot--Without Jolie?

2009-01-29 Thread Martin Baxter
You started with Gina.

The debate can stop now.





-[ Received Mail Content ]--

 Subject : Re: [scifinoir2] Tomb Raider Franchise to Get Reboot--Without Jolie?

 Date : Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:10:09 +

 From : keithbjohn...@comcast.net

 To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com


Agreed. Every time there's a movie role for a young woman nowadays, her name 
comes up. Now I can't deny she's easy on the eyes, but again, I haven't seen 
that she's a great actress, even an action type. Jolie, for all her 
overexposure, is a good actress. As for Wonder Woman, I feel Fox is too slight 
of build for that role. To play the Amazon queen, they really need a statuesque 
woman, somehow with a build similar to Gina Torres or Lucy Lawless.

Any suggestions you'd have for a new Lara Croft or for Diana Prince? And you 
know me: the last thing I care about is a name star. A talented newbie is fine 
for me, even--gasp!--something radical like a real Brit for Croft and a Greek 
actress for Prince!




 -- Original message --
From: Daryle Lockhart 
 Megan Fox's management has said she's not involved in this movie at 
 all -- yet.
 
 File this under Wonder Woman. The studios are trying to figure out 
 who the hottest actress in Hollywood is. Instead of just asking the 
 bloggers ( they know everybody) they're going through this and 
 reading the results.
 
 On Jan 28, 2009, at 2:50 PM, keithbjohn...@comcast.net wrote:
 
  Sad thing is, I didn't think the Tomb Raider movies were that bad. 
  Forgettable, perhaps, but not junk like what's served up on SciFi. 
  Indeed, there were the basics of good movies here: Jolie's presence 
  (she can play borderline psycho/aggressive like nobody), decent 
  directing, and guest stars a cut above the norm in scifi/adventure 
  movies (Daniel Craig, Jon Voight, Gerard Butler, Djimon Honsou). 
  Indeed, as I've seen a billion times, the second flick made me 
  think Jolie had the chops to start a real spy movie franchise.
  I always wanted the writers to tweak the stories and make it 
  something more solid.
 
  I haven't seen anything to make me think Meagan Fox can act as well 
  as Jolie even in a throwaway action flick, and the directional 
  change worries me. I fear we'll end up with something even more 
  forgettable: complete American-style over-the-top action and 
  violence with crazy camera angles, devoid of anything remotely 
  interesting. In short, something on the level of Resident Evil or 
  the increasingly stupid Transporter movies.
 
  Oh well, such is life. I'm more anxious to see Vin Diesel tweak the 
  Chronicles of Riddick thing and bring a sequel movie our way...
 
  
 
  [ AP ]
 
  Angelina Jolie's loss may just be Megan Fox's gain.
 
  Warner Bros. has confirmed plans to relaunch�and completely 
  overhaul�the hot pants-wearing, artifact-collecting Lara Croft: 
  Tomb Raider franchise, with the first major casualty being Jolie.
 
  According to the Hollywood Reporter, the third film will completely 
  reboot the video game-based character, including changing her 
  origin story (most likely shying away from her English aristocracy 
  roots) and introduce new kinds of missions, love interests and 
  villains.
 
  And, most notably, a new leading lady.
 
  While producers say an actress likely won't be cast until a writer 
  and director have signed on, Fox has emerged as the frontrunner 
  replacement, at least as far as the blogosphere is concerned.
 
  While Lara Croft: Tomb Raider and its inconsistently punctuated 
  sequel Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life were produced by 
  Paramount, the rights to the series have since reverted back to 
  video game purveyor Eidos. In December, Time Warner increased its 
  stake in the multimedia company, ensuring in-house studio Warner 
  Bros. first dibs to what has been a lucrative, abeit critically 
  panned, franchise.
 
  The first installment, released in 2001, grossed $275 million 
  worldwide, while the 2003 sequel earned $157 million. All told, the 
  video game series, which launched in 1996, has accounted for more 
  than $1 billion.
 
  
 
  Post your SciFiNoir Profile at
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add? 
  fmvn=mapYahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQdwk8Yntds

Re: [scifinoir2] Tomb Raider Franchise to Get Reboot--Without Jolie?

2009-01-29 Thread KeithBJohnson
Ha-ha!
 -- Original message --
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@lycos.com
 You started with Gina.
 
 The debate can stop now.
 
 
 
 
 
 -[ Received Mail Content ]--
 
  Subject : Re: [scifinoir2] Tomb Raider Franchise to Get Reboot--Without 
 Jolie?
 
  Date : Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:10:09 +
 
  From : keithbjohn...@comcast.net
 
  To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 
 
 Agreed. Every time there's a movie role for a young woman nowadays, her name 
 comes up. Now I can't deny she's easy on the eyes, but again, I haven't seen 
 that she's a great actress, even an action type. Jolie, for all her 
 overexposure, is a good actress. As for Wonder Woman, I feel Fox is too 
 slight 
 of build for that role. To play the Amazon queen, they really need a 
 statuesque 
 woman, somehow with a build similar to Gina Torres or Lucy Lawless.
 
 Any suggestions you'd have for a new Lara Croft or for Diana Prince? And you 
 know me: the last thing I care about is a name star. A talented newbie is 
 fine 
 for me, even--gasp!--something radical like a real Brit for Croft and a Greek 
 actress for Prince!
 
 
 
 
  -- Original message --
 From: Daryle Lockhart 
  Megan Fox's management has said she's not involved in this movie at 
  all -- yet.
  
  File this under Wonder Woman. The studios are trying to figure out 
  who the hottest actress in Hollywood is. Instead of just asking the 
  bloggers ( they know everybody) they're going through this and 
  reading the results.
  
  On Jan 28, 2009, at 2:50 PM, keithbjohn...@comcast.net wrote:
  
   Sad thing is, I didn't think the Tomb Raider movies were that bad. 
   Forgettable, perhaps, but not junk like what's served up on SciFi. 
   Indeed, there were the basics of good movies here: Jolie's presence 
   (she can play borderline psycho/aggressive like nobody), decent 
   directing, and guest stars a cut above the norm in scifi/adventure 
   movies (Daniel Craig, Jon Voight, Gerard Butler, Djimon Honsou). 
   Indeed, as I've seen a billion times, the second flick made me 
   think Jolie had the chops to start a real spy movie franchise.
   I always wanted the writers to tweak the stories and make it 
   something more solid.
  
   I haven't seen anything to make me think Meagan Fox can act as well 
   as Jolie even in a throwaway action flick, and the directional 
   change worries me. I fear we'll end up with something even more 
   forgettable: complete American-style over-the-top action and 
   violence with crazy camera angles, devoid of anything remotely 
   interesting. In short, something on the level of Resident Evil or 
   the increasingly stupid Transporter movies.
  
   Oh well, such is life. I'm more anxious to see Vin Diesel tweak the 
   Chronicles of Riddick thing and bring a sequel movie our way...
  
   
  
   [ AP ]
  
   Angelina Jolie's loss may just be Megan Fox's gain.
  
   Warner Bros. has confirmed plans to relaunch�and completely 
   overhaul�the hot pants-wearing, artifact-collecting Lara Croft: 
   Tomb Raider franchise, with the first major casualty being Jolie.
  
   According to the Hollywood Reporter, the third film will completely 
   reboot the video game-based character, including changing her 
   origin story (most likely shying away from her English aristocracy 
   roots) and introduce new kinds of missions, love interests and 
   villains.
  
   And, most notably, a new leading lady.
  
   While producers say an actress likely won't be cast until a writer 
   and director have signed on, Fox has emerged as the frontrunner 
   replacement, at least as far as the blogosphere is concerned.
  
   While Lara Croft: Tomb Raider and its inconsistently punctuated 
   sequel Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life were produced by 
   Paramount, the rights to the series have since reverted back to 
   video game purveyor Eidos. In December, Time Warner increased its 
   stake in the multimedia company, ensuring in-house studio Warner 
   Bros. first dibs to what has been a lucrative, abeit critically 
   panned, franchise.
  
   The first installment, released in 2001, grossed $275 million 
   worldwide, while the 2003 sequel earned $157 million. All told, the 
   video game series, which launched in 1996, has accounted for more 
   than $1 billion.
  
   
  
   Post your SciFiNoir Profile at
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add? 
   fmvn=mapYahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQdwk8Yntds

---BeginMessage---













   You started with Gina.The debate can stop now.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
 Subject : Re: [scifinoir2] Tomb Raider Franchise to Get Reboot--Without Jolie?
 Date : Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:10:09 
 From : KeithBJohnson@comcast.net
 To : scifino...@yahoogroups.com

Agreed. Every time

[scifinoir2] Tomb Raider Franchise to Get Reboot--Without Jolie?

2009-01-28 Thread KeithBJohnson
Sad thing is, I didn't think the Tomb Raider movies were that bad. Forgettable, 
perhaps, but not junk like what's served up on SciFi. Indeed, there were the 
basics of good movies here: Jolie's presence (she can play borderline 
psycho/aggressive like nobody), decent directing, and guest stars a cut above 
the norm in scifi/adventure movies (Daniel Craig, Jon Voight, Gerard Butler, 
Djimon Honsou). Indeed, as I've seen a billion times, the second flick made me 
think Jolie had the chops to start a real spy movie franchise.  
I always wanted the writers to tweak the stories and make it something more 
solid.

I haven't seen anything to make me think Meagan Fox can act as well as Jolie 
even in a throwaway action flick, and the directional change worries me. I 
fear we'll end up with something even more forgettable: complete American-style 
over-the-top action and violence with crazy camera angles, devoid of anything 
remotely interesting. In short, something on the level of Resident Evil or the 
increasingly stupid Transporter movies.

Oh well, such is life. I'm more anxious to see Vin Diesel tweak the Chronicles 
of Riddick thing and bring a sequel movie our way...



[ AP ]

Angelina Jolie's loss may just be Megan Fox's gain.

Warner Bros. has confirmed plans to relaunch—and completely overhaul—the hot 
pants-wearing, artifact-collecting Lara Croft: Tomb Raider franchise, with the 
first major casualty being Jolie.

According to the Hollywood Reporter, the third film will completely reboot the 
video game-based character, including changing her origin story (most likely 
shying away from her English aristocracy roots) and introduce new kinds of 
missions, love interests and villains.

And, most notably, a new leading lady.

While producers say an actress likely won't be cast until a writer and director 
have signed on, Fox has emerged as the frontrunner replacement, at least as far 
as the blogosphere is concerned.

While Lara Croft: Tomb Raider and its inconsistently punctuated sequel Lara 
Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life were produced by Paramount, the rights to 
the series have since reverted back to video game purveyor Eidos. In December, 
Time Warner increased its stake in the multimedia company, ensuring in-house 
studio Warner Bros. first dibs to what has been a lucrative, abeit critically 
panned, franchise.

The first installment, released in 2001, grossed $275 million worldwide, while 
the 2003 sequel earned $157 million. All told, the video game series, which 
launched in 1996, has accounted for more than $1 billion.



Post your SciFiNoir Profile at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add?fmvn=mapYahoo!
 Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:scifinoir2-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:scifinoir2-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
scifinoir2-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [scifinoir2] Tomb Raider Franchise to Get Reboot--Without Jolie?

2009-01-28 Thread Daryle Lockhart
Megan Fox's management  has said she's not involved in this movie at   
all -- yet.

File this under Wonder Woman. The studios are trying to  figure out  
who the hottest  actress in Hollywood is. Instead of just  asking the  
bloggers ( they  know everybody)  they're going through this and  
reading the results.

On Jan 28, 2009, at 2:50 PM, keithbjohn...@comcast.net wrote:

 Sad thing is, I didn't think the Tomb Raider movies were that bad.  
 Forgettable, perhaps, but not junk like what's served up on SciFi.  
 Indeed, there were the basics of good movies here: Jolie's presence  
 (she can play borderline psycho/aggressive like nobody), decent  
 directing, and guest stars a cut above the norm in scifi/adventure  
 movies (Daniel Craig, Jon Voight, Gerard Butler, Djimon Honsou).  
 Indeed, as I've seen a billion times, the second flick made me  
 think Jolie had the chops to start a real spy movie franchise.
 I always wanted the writers to tweak the stories and make it  
 something more solid.

 I haven't seen anything to make me think Meagan Fox can act as well  
 as Jolie even in a throwaway action flick, and the directional  
 change worries me. I fear we'll end up with something even more  
 forgettable: complete American-style over-the-top action and  
 violence with crazy camera angles, devoid of anything remotely  
 interesting. In short, something on the level of Resident Evil or  
 the increasingly stupid Transporter movies.

 Oh well, such is life. I'm more anxious to see Vin Diesel tweak the  
 Chronicles of Riddick thing and bring a sequel movie our way...

 

 [ AP ]

 Angelina Jolie's loss may just be Megan Fox's gain.

 Warner Bros. has confirmed plans to relaunch—and completely  
 overhaul—the hot pants-wearing, artifact-collecting Lara Croft:  
 Tomb Raider franchise, with the first major casualty being Jolie.

 According to the Hollywood Reporter, the third film will completely  
 reboot the video game-based character, including changing her  
 origin story (most likely shying away from her English aristocracy  
 roots) and introduce new kinds of missions, love interests and  
 villains.

 And, most notably, a new leading lady.

 While producers say an actress likely won't be cast until a writer  
 and director have signed on, Fox has emerged as the frontrunner  
 replacement, at least as far as the blogosphere is concerned.

 While Lara Croft: Tomb Raider and its inconsistently punctuated  
 sequel Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life were produced by  
 Paramount, the rights to the series have since reverted back to  
 video game purveyor Eidos. In December, Time Warner increased its  
 stake in the multimedia company, ensuring in-house studio Warner  
 Bros. first dibs to what has been a lucrative, abeit critically  
 panned, franchise.

 The first installment, released in 2001, grossed $275 million  
 worldwide, while the 2003 sequel earned $157 million. All told, the  
 video game series, which launched in 1996, has accounted for more  
 than $1 billion.

 

 Post your SciFiNoir Profile at
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add? 
 fmvn=mapYahoo! Groups Links






Re: [scifinoir2] Tomb Raider Franchise to Get Reboot--Without Jolie?

2009-01-28 Thread Martin Baxter
Dibs on the wall!





-[ Received Mail Content ]--

 Subject : Re: [scifinoir2] Tomb Raider Franchise to Get Reboot--Without Jolie?

 Date : Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:03:15 -0500

 From : Daryle Lockhart dar...@darylelockhart.com

 To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com


Megan Fox's management has said she's not involved in this movie at 
all -- yet.

File this under Wonder Woman. The studios are trying to figure out 
who the hottest actress in Hollywood is. Instead of just asking the 
bloggers ( they know everybody) they're going through this and 
reading the results.

On Jan 28, 2009, at 2:50 PM, keithbjohn...@comcast.net wrote:

 Sad thing is, I didn't think the Tomb Raider movies were that bad. 
 Forgettable, perhaps, but not junk like what's served up on SciFi. 
 Indeed, there were the basics of good movies here: Jolie's presence 
 (she can play borderline psycho/aggressive like nobody), decent 
 directing, and guest stars a cut above the norm in scifi/adventure 
 movies (Daniel Craig, Jon Voight, Gerard Butler, Djimon Honsou). 
 Indeed, as I've seen a billion times, the second flick made me 
 think Jolie had the chops to start a real spy movie franchise.
 I always wanted the writers to tweak the stories and make it 
 something more solid.

 I haven't seen anything to make me think Meagan Fox can act as well 
 as Jolie even in a throwaway action flick, and the directional 
 change worries me. I fear we'll end up with something even more 
 forgettable: complete American-style over-the-top action and 
 violence with crazy camera angles, devoid of anything remotely 
 interesting. In short, something on the level of Resident Evil or 
 the increasingly stupid Transporter movies.

 Oh well, such is life. I'm more anxious to see Vin Diesel tweak the 
 Chronicles of Riddick thing and bring a sequel movie our way...

 

 [ AP ]

 Angelina Jolie's loss may just be Megan Fox's gain.

 Warner Bros. has confirmed plans to relaunch—and completely 
 overhaul—the hot pants-wearing, artifact-collecting Lara Croft: 
 Tomb Raider franchise, with the first major casualty being Jolie.

 According to the Hollywood Reporter, the third film will completely 
 reboot the video game-based character, including changing her 
 origin story (most likely shying away from her English aristocracy 
 roots) and introduce new kinds of missions, love interests and 
 villains.

 And, most notably, a new leading lady.

 While producers say an actress likely won't be cast until a writer 
 and director have signed on, Fox has emerged as the frontrunner 
 replacement, at least as far as the blogosphere is concerned.

 While Lara Croft: Tomb Raider and its inconsistently punctuated 
 sequel Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life were produced by 
 Paramount, the rights to the series have since reverted back to 
 video game purveyor Eidos. In December, Time Warner increased its 
 stake in the multimedia company, ensuring in-house studio Warner 
 Bros. first dibs to what has been a lucrative, abeit critically 
 panned, franchise.

 The first installment, released in 2001, grossed $275 million 
 worldwide, while the 2003 sequel earned $157 million. All told, the 
 video game series, which launched in 1996, has accounted for more 
 than $1 billion.

 

 Post your SciFiNoir Profile at
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add? 
 fmvn=mapYahoo! Groups Links







http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQdwk8Yntds

Re: [scifinoir2] Tomb Raider Franchise to Get Reboot--Without Jolie?

2009-01-28 Thread KeithBJohnson
Agreed. Every time there's a movie role for a young woman nowadays, her  name 
comes up.  Now I can't deny she's easy on the eyes, but again, I haven't seen 
that she's a great actress, even an action type. Jolie, for all her 
overexposure, is a good actress. As for Wonder Woman, I feel Fox is too slight 
of build for that role. To play the Amazon queen, they really need a statuesque 
woman, somehow with a build similar to Gina Torres or Lucy Lawless.

Any suggestions you'd have for a new Lara Croft or for Diana Prince? And you 
know me: the last thing I care about is a name star.  A talented newbie is fine 
for me, even--gasp!--something radical like a real Brit for Croft and a Greek 
actress for Prince!




 -- Original message --
From: Daryle Lockhart dar...@darylelockhart.com
 Megan Fox's management  has said she's not involved in this movie at   
 all -- yet.
 
 File this under Wonder Woman. The studios are trying to  figure out  
 who the hottest  actress in Hollywood is. Instead of just  asking the  
 bloggers ( they  know everybody)  they're going through this and  
 reading the results.
 
 On Jan 28, 2009, at 2:50 PM, keithbjohn...@comcast.net wrote:
 
  Sad thing is, I didn't think the Tomb Raider movies were that bad.  
  Forgettable, perhaps, but not junk like what's served up on SciFi.  
  Indeed, there were the basics of good movies here: Jolie's presence  
  (she can play borderline psycho/aggressive like nobody), decent  
  directing, and guest stars a cut above the norm in scifi/adventure  
  movies (Daniel Craig, Jon Voight, Gerard Butler, Djimon Honsou).  
  Indeed, as I've seen a billion times, the second flick made me  
  think Jolie had the chops to start a real spy movie franchise.
  I always wanted the writers to tweak the stories and make it  
  something more solid.
 
  I haven't seen anything to make me think Meagan Fox can act as well  
  as Jolie even in a throwaway action flick, and the directional  
  change worries me. I fear we'll end up with something even more  
  forgettable: complete American-style over-the-top action and  
  violence with crazy camera angles, devoid of anything remotely  
  interesting. In short, something on the level of Resident Evil or  
  the increasingly stupid Transporter movies.
 
  Oh well, such is life. I'm more anxious to see Vin Diesel tweak the  
  Chronicles of Riddick thing and bring a sequel movie our way...
 
  
 
  [ AP ]
 
  Angelina Jolie's loss may just be Megan Fox's gain.
 
  Warner Bros. has confirmed plans to relaunch—and completely  
  overhaul—the hot pants-wearing, artifact-collecting Lara Croft:  
  Tomb Raider franchise, with the first major casualty being Jolie.
 
  According to the Hollywood Reporter, the third film will completely  
  reboot the video game-based character, including changing her  
  origin story (most likely shying away from her English aristocracy  
  roots) and introduce new kinds of missions, love interests and  
  villains.
 
  And, most notably, a new leading lady.
 
  While producers say an actress likely won't be cast until a writer  
  and director have signed on, Fox has emerged as the frontrunner  
  replacement, at least as far as the blogosphere is concerned.
 
  While Lara Croft: Tomb Raider and its inconsistently punctuated  
  sequel Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life were produced by  
  Paramount, the rights to the series have since reverted back to  
  video game purveyor Eidos. In December, Time Warner increased its  
  stake in the multimedia company, ensuring in-house studio Warner  
  Bros. first dibs to what has been a lucrative, abeit critically  
  panned, franchise.
 
  The first installment, released in 2001, grossed $275 million  
  worldwide, while the 2003 sequel earned $157 million. All told, the  
  video game series, which launched in 1996, has accounted for more  
  than $1 billion.
 
  
 
  Post your SciFiNoir Profile at
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add? 
  fmvn=mapYahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 


---BeginMessage---













Megan Fox's management  has said she's not involved in this movie at   
all -- yet.

File this under Wonder Woman. The studios are trying to  figure out  
who the hottest  actress in Hollywood is. Instead of just  asking the  
bloggers ( they  know everybody)  they're going through this and  
reading the results.

On Jan 28, 2009, at 2:50 PM, KeithBJohnson@comcast.net wrote:

 Sad thing is, I didn't think the Tomb Raider movies were that bad.  
 Forgettable, perhaps, but not junk like what's served up on SciFi.  
 Indeed, there were the basics of good movies here: Jolie's presence  
 (she can play borderline psycho/aggressive like nobody), decent  
 directing, and guest stars a cut above the norm in scifi/adventure  
 movies (Daniel Craig, Jon Voight, Gerard Butler, Djimon Honsou).  
 Indeed, as