Re: [scifinoir2] FW: Artificial life forms evolve and outwit experimenter

2005-07-13 Thread Amy Harlib

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Wow!  These things will become really sentient next!  Fascinating!

  Subject: Artificial life forms evolve and ouwit experimenter
  If you want to find alien life-forms, hold off on booking that trip to the
  moons of Saturn. You may only need to catch a plane to East Lansing,
  Michigan.

  The aliens of East Lansing are not made of carbon and water. They have no
  DNA. Billions of them are quietly colonizing a cluster of 200computers in
  the basement of the Plant and Soil Sciences building at Michigan State
  University. To peer into their world, however, you have to walk a few blocks
  west on Wilson Road to the engineering department and visit the Digital
  Evolution Laboratory. Here you'll find a crew of computer scientists,
  biologists, and even a philosopher or two gazing at computer monitors,
  watching the evolution of bizarre new life-forms.

  These are digital organisms-strings of commands-akin to computer viruses.
  Each organism can produce tens of thousands of copies of itself within a
  matter of minutes. Unlike computer viruses, however, they are made up of
  digital bits that can mutate in much the same way DNA mutates. A software
  program called Avida allows researchers to track the birth, life, and death
  of generation after generation of the digital organisms by scanning columns
  of numbers that pour down a computer screen like waterfalls.

  After more than a decade of development, Avida's digital organisms are now
  getting close to fulfilling the definition of biological life. "More and
  more of the features that biologists have said were necessary for life we
  can check off," says Robert Pennock, a philosopher at Michigan State and a
  member of the Avida team. "Does this, does that, does this. Metabolism?
  Maybe not quite yet, but getting pretty close."

  One thing the digital organisms do particularly well is evolve." Avida is
  not a simulation of evolution; it is an instance of it," Pennock says. "All
  the core parts of the Darwinian process are there. These things replicate,
  they mutate, they are competing with one another. The very process of
  natural selection is happening there. If that's central to the definition of
  life, then these things count."

  It may seem strange to talk about a chunk of computer code in the same way
  you talk about a cherry tree or a dolphin. But the more biologists think
  about life, the more compelling the equation becomes. Computer programs and
  DNA are both sets of instructions. Computer programs tell a computer how to
  process information, while DNA instructs a cell how to assemble proteins.

  The ultimate goal of the instructions in DNA is to make new organisms that
  contain the same genetic instructions. "You could consider a living organism
  as nothing more than an information channel, where it's transmitting its
  genome to its offspring," says Charles Ofria, director of the Digital
  Evolution Laboratory. "And the information stored in the channel is how to
  build a new channel." So a computer program that contains instructions for
  making new copies of itself has taken a significant step toward life.

  A cherry tree absorbs raw materials and turns them into useful things. In
  goes carbon dioxide, water, and nutrients. Out comes wood, cherries, and
  toxins to ward off insects. A computer program works the same way. Consider
  a program that adds two numbers. The numbers go in like carbon dioxide and
  water, and the sum comes out like a cherry tree.

  In the late 1990s Ofria's former adviser, physicist Chris Adami of Caltech,
  set out to create the conditions in which a computer program could evolve
  the ability to do addition. He created some primitive digital organisms and
  at regular intervals presented numbers to them. At first they could do
  nothing. But each time a digital organism replicated, there was a small
  chance that one of its command lines might mutate. On a rare occasion, these
  mutations allowed an organism to process one of the numbers in a simple way.
  An organism might acquire the ability simply to read a number, for example,
  and then produce an identical output.

  Adami rewarded the digital organisms by speeding up the time it took them to
  reproduce. If an organism could read two numbers at once, he would speed up
  its reproduction even more. And if they could add the numbers, he would give
  them an even bigger reward. Within six months, Adami's organisms were
  addition whizzes. "We were able to get them to evolve without fail," he
  says. But when he stopped to look at exactly how the organisms were adding
  numbers, he was more surprised. "Some of the ways were obvious, but with
  others I'd say, 'What the hell is happening?' It seemed completely insane."

  On a trip to Michigan State, Adami met microbiologist Richard Lenski, who
  studies the evolution of bacteria. Adami later sent Lenski a copy of the
  Avida software so he could try it out for hims

Re: [scifinoir2] FW: Artificial life forms evolve and outwit experimenter

2005-07-12 Thread Brent Wodehouse
"Tracey de Morsella \(formerly Tracey L. Minor\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:

>-Original Message-
>From: Chris de Morsella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 8:22 PM
>To: Lists for Tracey deMorsella; julia demorsella; Paul de Morsella
>Subject: Artificial life forms evolve and ouwit experimenter


Excellent article! Thank you for this, Tracey (and too, Chris).


Brent



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/