Participating to MUSCLE project
Hi everyone, I have just joined this project and I wonder if someone has some archives of the mailing list. Also, as a pure exercise for understanding how the CT-API and the MCT works, I have made some modifications to the mct driver of gregor. Mainly, I have introduced some symbolic constans and moved some code here and there. I cannot test the code as I have no reader. The new tarball is available at: http://camelot.sssup.it/pibizza/mct.tgz Many thanks Paolo Bizzarri Technical Manager I3 Icube Srl *** Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html ***
Re: MUSCLE CTAPI test program
On Sun, Sep 27, 1998 at 09:33:55AM -0500, David Corcoran wrote: > No, not yet. Are you up for it ? It would be really nice to have > something that tells what is wrong with a person's CT-API library. Yes. I hope to finish CT-API for the Argus 210 CT in a couple of weeks, but I want test my work before the release. Any suggestion ? -- Ciao Walter. C makes it easy for you to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes that harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg. -- Bjarne Stroustrup *** Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html ***
Re: MUSCLE naming convention
rn Sun, Sep 27, 1998 at 01:09:53PM +0200, gregor wrote: > ok > so the lib should look like: libctapi-n.so.x.yy > and the link: libctapi-n.so > > is that correct? > Yes. Remember also the link libctapi-n.so.x -- Ciao Walter. C makes it easy for you to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes that harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg. -- Bjarne Stroustrup *** Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html ***
Re: MUSCLE CTAPI test program
No, not yet. Are you up for it ? It would be really nice to have something that tells what is wrong with a person's CT-API library. Thanks Dave On Sun, 27 Sep 1998, you wrote: >Have someone already writed a program to test a ctapi library? > >I mean a `complete' test. >With : >1) CTAPI implementation >2) CTBCS check >3) ISO7816-4 commands > >-- >Ciao Walter. > >C makes it easy for you to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes that >harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg. > -- Bjarne Stroustrup >*** >Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. >(Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) >http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html >*** -- ** David Corcoran Internet Security/Smartcards Work:School: 205 Industrial Blvd 2252 US Highway 52 West Apt C4 Sugar Land, TX 77478 West Lafayette, IN 47906 Suggestion: Use Linux, it is for IQ's higher than 95. Quote: If you can't make it work, at least make it look good. ~ Bill Gates ** *** Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html ***
Re: MUSCLE naming convention
Walter Franzini wrote: > On Sun, Sep 27, 1998 at 09:22:03AM +0200, gregor wrote: > > > > OK, you're right. > > > > but then i would prefer > > > > libctapi-.x.yy.so > > > > because, there is no need for symoblic links > Yes, but when you replace a library whit a newer version you must > recompile all programs that depend on it. > Using symlinks you only need to update symlinks. > > bye gregor ok so the lib should look like: libctapi-n.so.x.yy and the link: libctapi-n.so is that correct? bye gregor *** Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html ***
Re: MUSCLE CTAPI test program
Walter Franzini wrote: > Have someone already writed a program to test a ctapi library? > > I mean a `complete' test. > With : > 1) CTAPI implementation > 2) CTBCS check > 3) ISO7816-4 commands i'm on it bye gregor *** Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html ***
MUSCLE CTAPI test program
Have someone already writed a program to test a ctapi library? I mean a `complete' test. With : 1) CTAPI implementation 2) CTBCS check 3) ISO7816-4 commands -- Ciao Walter. C makes it easy for you to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes that harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg. -- Bjarne Stroustrup *** Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html ***
Re: MUSCLE naming convention
On Sun, Sep 27, 1998 at 09:22:03AM +0200, gregor wrote: > > OK, you're right. > > but then i would prefer > > libctapi-.x.yy.so > > because, there is no need for symoblic links Yes, but when you replace a library whit a newer version you must recompile all programs that depend on it. Using symlinks you only need to update symlinks. > bye gregor -- Ciao Walter. C makes it easy for you to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes that harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg. -- Bjarne Stroustrup *** Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html ***
Re: MUSCLE naming convention
Walter Franzini wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 1998 at 05:46:49PM +0200, gregor wrote: > > a ct-api should named like this: > > > > ctapi-n.xyy.so > > > > where n is a "well know identifier" > > x the major-no of the release > > y the minor-no of the release > I suggest to use a different naming convention: > libctapi-n.so.xyy > whit the lib* prefix we can link a specific ctapi implementation whit > -lctapi- > Take a look to libtool :) > > -- > Ciao Walter. > OK, you're right. but then i would prefer libctapi-.x.yy.so because, there is no need for symoblic links bye gregor *** Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html ***
