MUSCLE GPR400 ifd and T=0 vs T=1 from the driver perspective
I've got a mostly working GPR400 PCSC IFD. It's based on the PCMCIA driver found in the card-0.9.6.tar.gz file found on the MUSCLE website. By 'mostly working' I mean that I've used formaticc to send a few APDUs to a card and received the expected results. I'm having troubles understanding what the differences are between T=0 and T=1 from the IFD developer perspective. It's not apparent to me from looking through the other IFD source files. I have the Smart Card Developer's Kit and Java Card Technology for Smart Cards books already. I understand that T=0 and T=1 are two different protocols for communication between the reader and the card. It is not clear to me *how* they are different other than one is byte oriented and the other is block oriented. Can anyone offer any insight into the differences, if possible, from the IFD developer perspective? Can you point me to some documentation and/or code that will clear this up for me? Thanks in advance. -joe *** Unix Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/ To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe sclinux ***
Re: MUSCLE PKCS#11 and Cyberflex on Linux?
I had run across this some time ago. a search for 'gpkcs' on google turned this site up: http://www.gnu.org/software/gpkcs-11/gpkcs-11.html here is the google results page: http://www.google.com/search?q=gpkcs NOTE: I've never used GPKCS but I'd be interested in hearing about results. -joe On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:08:02AM +0100, Marcil, Julien (iT_SEC) wrote: Hi All, I have a java application that uses the Cyberflex Card. The card is used to perform cryptographic functions. The application was developed on Windows (for Windows) using the Cyberflex Access SDK. The crypto function are accessed using the PKCS#11 interface provided by the SDK. I need to port this application to Linux. The PC/SC-Lite gives me access to the card, but I need a PKCS#11 library for Cyberflex that runs on Linux. Does such a library exist? If yes, where can I find it. If no, how could I provide smart card support to my application? Thank you, Julien Marcil *** Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html ***
MUSCLE cyberflex sdk for linux - UPDATE
all, A new response appeared yesterday on the schlumberger discussion boards: http://smartie.austin.apc.slb.com/forums/cybactools/108.html -joe *** Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html ***
Re: MUSCLE cyberflex sdk for linux
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 06:04:56PM -0500, Jim Rees wrote: The linux sdk was there two weeks ago, but now I can't find it. Maybe it has been removed now that Danny is gone. You can put most of it together yourself except for mksolo and the class files. The Readme is still there and describes what was in the sdk: http://www.cyberflex.slb.com/Support/cyberflex_linux_readme.html I found these the other day after poking around some. so anyway, don't I *need* mksolo related classes in order to build cardlets with the Cyberflex Access 00 cards? thanks for responding so quickly. -joe *** Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html ***
