Hi Michael,
On 16.05.2014 18:42, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Hi,
based on the pull requests #138 #139 #140, fixing various issues,
now I've been able to get the aix-soname thingy into SCons.
However, as a SCons newbie, I'm unsure whether the way I've implemented
this into SCons is based on correct assumptions on how SCons should work.
Actually, I've been able to reduce the number of failing tests
from 90 to 65 on the AIX box I'm working on.
https://bitbucket.org/haubi/scons/commits/76108c06ac81150a4d79a52583d3cf7a5e6fa1cd
Thoughts?
I had a quick glance at your pull requests and the commit mentioned
above. To me it looks like you're doing solid work, please keep it up.
Someone else (Gary?) should comment on your introduction of CCVENDOR,
I'm a bit unsure whether this is the way to go while having the new
toolchain design in mind.
Please try to use bookmarks instead of named branches for organizing
your local work and commits. See also:
http://www.scons.org/wiki/SconsMercurialWorkflows
Other than that, good job and thanks for all the effort you have put
into this!
Best regards,
Dirk
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
