Re: [Scons-dev] User Guide generation questions
That may be a valid problem though because when I run *scons* from #
*doc/user* the index.html generated from the build is completely empty.
V/R,
William
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 30.08.2014 00:12, William Blevins wrote:
I am trying to make some misc updates to the User Guide, and I am having
some issues. I thought it might be a problem with a document do I tried
docs-validate and there were two errors:
[...]
81.11% (176/217) doc/user/scons_ex.xml
ERROR: doc/user/scons_ex.xml fails to validate:
Element 'programlisting': This element is not expected. Expected is one
of ( {http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}refentry.class, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}refentry, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}section.class, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}section, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}toc, {http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}lot,
{http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}index, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}glossary, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}bibliography, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}simplesect )., line 4116
81.57% (177/217) doc/user/sconf.xml
[...]
92.63% (201/217) doc/user/scons_exi.xml
ERROR: doc/user/scons_exi.xml fails to validate:
Element 'programlisting': This element is not expected. Expected is one
of ( {http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}refentry.class, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}refentry, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}section.class, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}section, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}toc, {http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}lot,
{http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}index, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}glossary, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}bibliography, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}simplesect )., line 4367
Validation failed! Please correct the errors above and try again.
Can I remove those sections? I'm not that familiar with the schema.
The failing files scons_ex.xml and scons_exi.xml are generated
during the actual build process. Remove them by hand, or do a scons -c
before trying to validate...
Regards,
Dirk
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] User Guide generation questions
Do you have a branch/repo I can pull from/clone to see?
I use docbook a lot.
On August 31, 2014 10:51:14 AM CDT, William Blevins wblevins...@gmail.com
wrote:
That may be a valid problem though because when I run *scons* from #
*doc/user* the index.html generated from the build is completely empty.
V/R,
William
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 30.08.2014 00:12, William Blevins wrote:
I am trying to make some misc updates to the User Guide, and I am
having
some issues. I thought it might be a problem with a document do I
tried
docs-validate and there were two errors:
[...]
81.11% (176/217) doc/user/scons_ex.xml
ERROR: doc/user/scons_ex.xml fails to validate:
Element 'programlisting': This element is not expected. Expected is
one
of ( {http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}refentry.class, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}refentry, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}section.class, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}section, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}toc,
{http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}lot,
{http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}index, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}glossary, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}bibliography, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}simplesect )., line 4116
81.57% (177/217) doc/user/sconf.xml
[...]
92.63% (201/217) doc/user/scons_exi.xml
ERROR: doc/user/scons_exi.xml fails to validate:
Element 'programlisting': This element is not expected. Expected is
one
of ( {http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}refentry.class, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}refentry, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}section.class, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}section, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}toc,
{http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}lot,
{http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}index, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}glossary, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}bibliography, {
http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0}simplesect )., line 4367
Validation failed! Please correct the errors above and try again.
Can I remove those sections? I'm not that familiar with the schema.
The failing files scons_ex.xml and scons_exi.xml are generated
during the actual build process. Remove them by hand, or do a scons
-c
before trying to validate...
Regards,
Dirk
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Re PR #171
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk wrote: The whole ASCII string / Unicode codepoint sequence thing brings the Python 2/Python 3 thing to a head. If we want a codebase that runs under both Python 2 and Python 3 then we almost certainly have to use six to provide the indirection layer for things like strings (unless we write our own). Alternatively the Python 3 codebase can be separate (which is what Anatoly was advocating if I remember correctly) and then do careful cherry picks from the Python 2 codebase. six.py is now included in the python3 branch. At this point not everything works (still a long way from it) but I see no showstopping issues that have cropped up yet. (By showstopping I mean something that would prevent shipping a single codebase that works in 2.7 and 3.x.) There is also then process: I can probably spend an hour here an hour there fixing broke tests but should these individual sessions be separate pull requests? Sure. On the python3 branch. If you have a bunch of related ones, I see no reason those couldn't be reviewed and merged together. -- Gary ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
[Scons-dev] Quick Sanity Check
Has anyone claimed that the python3 branch has ever compiled with Python 3? There are some obvious errors in my checkout that mean the code base can never have actually compiled. If my checkout is the real python3 branch, I will hit the obvious low hanging fruit. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] User Guide generation questions
William, On 31.08.2014 19:50, William Blevins wrote: This is happening from a clean scons checkout with no local changes. I am currently at revision 3187:605ae0a39155. I assume this is also an issue in default latest. Using python 2.6 on a RHEL6 or equivalent linux distro. I'm currently at revision 3189:98dea26fbc96 and I can build the docs just fine. My working directory is #doc/user and I call python ../../src/script/scons.py . Please ensure that you have the following Python bindings on your system libxml2+libxslt or lxml. Regards, Dirk V/R, William On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Mark Flacy mfl...@verizon.net mailto:mfl...@verizon.net wrote: Do you have a branch/repo I can pull from/clone to see? I use docbook a lot. On August 31, 2014 10:51:14 AM CDT, William Blevins wblevins...@gmail.com mailto:wblevins...@gmail.com wrote: That may be a valid problem though because when I run *scons* from #*doc/user* the index.html generated from the build is completely empty. V/R, William ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] User Guide generation questions
python ../../src/script/scons.py Please ensure that you have the following Python bindings on your system libxml2+libxslt or lxml. I have *python-lxml-2.2.3-1* installed. I tried *python ../../src/script/scons.py* with both python 2.6 and python 2.7 with the same results (from what I could tell). There is an index.html in *#doc/user* that has been committed but it doesn't seem to update, and the index.html inside *#doc/user/scons-user* is empty (size 0 bytes). I was able to generate these files correctly (I assume) when I updated docs for Issue2395, but my baseline was probably from a month ago or longer. V/R, William On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote: William, On 31.08.2014 19:50, William Blevins wrote: This is happening from a clean scons checkout with no local changes. I am currently at revision 3187:605ae0a39155. I assume this is also an issue in default latest. Using python 2.6 on a RHEL6 or equivalent linux distro. I'm currently at revision 3189:98dea26fbc96 and I can build the docs just fine. My working directory is #doc/user and I call python ../../src/script/scons.py . Please ensure that you have the following Python bindings on your system libxml2+libxslt or lxml. Regards, Dirk V/R, William On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Mark Flacy mfl...@verizon.net wrote: Do you have a branch/repo I can pull from/clone to see? I use docbook a lot. On August 31, 2014 10:51:14 AM CDT, William Blevins wblevins...@gmail.com wrote: That may be a valid problem though because when I run *scons* from # *doc/user* the index.html generated from the build is completely empty. V/R, William ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Quick Sanity Check
That branch is the one. If you check the commits on that branch you'll see who's been committing to it. I just yesterday got a python3 installed, so I haven't touched it under python3, though I have kept pushing it back into functioning on python2 (but not all the way there yet either). So yeah, there is plenty of juicy low-hanging fruit. :-) On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Bill Deegan b...@baddogconsulting.com wrote: Russel, I'm hoping to get a python3 buildbot slave up and running against the python3 branch sometime this week. That way it will be easier to keep an eye on it's current status. -Bill On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk wrote: Has anyone claimed that the python3 branch has ever compiled with Python 3? There are some obvious errors in my checkout that mean the code base can never have actually compiled. If my checkout is the real python3 branch, I will hit the obvious low hanging fruit. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev -- Gary ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
