Re: [Scons-dev] Roundup tracker demo instance...
2015-09-28 21:42 GMT+02:00 William Blevins: > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Russel Winder > wrote: > >> On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 13:56 +0100, William L Blevins wrote: >> > […] >> > I have used Jira and I think if we can get free instances for the >> > project, then the direct jira -> bitbucket <- confluence setup will >> > give us a lot of project management control. >> >> Personally I found Confluence a right royal pain in the arse. JIRA on >> the other hand worked very well for me. The issue is whether SCons can >> have a JIRA directly linked to the Mercurial repository and its pull >> requests. >> > > > Since they are all Atlassian products, I cannot imagine "no" to be the > answer; otherwise, what is the point? > > William, I agree with you, that it is not the question, *if* there is support for connecting bitbucket hosted mercurial repos with JIRA. ( http://blogs.atlassian.com/2012/07/connect-jira-to-your-git-or-mercurial-repositories-with-the-jira-dvcs-connector) It's more the question how mature it is. From my previous experience, Atlassian does a quite good job of integrating their products. Nevertheless, the best (and IMO only) way to find out, if there are any technical / user experiance obstacles left for using JIRA<->Bitbucket for Scons, is to give it a try: 1. Check for JIRA<->Mercurial on Bitbucket integration with a sandbox project 2. Adapt the scripts of Dirk to import the existing issues from tigris I'd volunteer to do this to have a solid basis for further decision-making. -Florian ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Does SCons test support negative tests?
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Bill Deeganwrote: > Gary, > > For this test I ended up just having the full expected output, in this > case I effectively checked for the output not being there. > It worked for the negative case because the output is pretty short. > > Can you use must_not_contain on stdout? > I'm thinking our test framework docs are pretty sparse. > There's a _small_ amount in the wiki, at https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/DeveloperGuide/TestingMethodology/QMTestMethods and https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/DeveloperGuide/TestingMethodology. The README in the QMTest dir is not all that helpful; that'd be a good place for some of this IMHO. -- Gary ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Does SCons test support negative tests?
Gary, For this test I ended up just having the full expected output, in this case I effectively checked for the output not being there. It worked for the negative case because the output is pretty short. Can you use must_not_contain on stdout? I'm thinking our test framework docs are pretty sparse. -Bill On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Gary Oberbrunnerwrote: > Can you just have two tests, one must_contain() and the other > must_not_contain()? > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Bill Deegan > wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> I'm looking through the test logic and I don't see a way to say: >> 1) Output must have xyz in it >> 2) AND must NOT have abc in it >> >> I'm working on a test for the append flag for Help() and depending on >> it's setting the output from >> scons -h >> >> should or shouldn't contain help from AddOption()'s. >> >> I could specify the exact full output expected, but it would seem easier >> to maintain if I only check for 1 and 2 above. >> >> Thanks, >> Bill >> >> ___ >> Scons-dev mailing list >> Scons-dev@scons.org >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >> >> > > > -- > Gary > > ___ > Scons-dev mailing list > Scons-dev@scons.org > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > > ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
[Scons-dev] Does SCons test support negative tests?
Greetings, I'm looking through the test logic and I don't see a way to say: 1) Output must have xyz in it 2) AND must NOT have abc in it I'm working on a test for the append flag for Help() and depending on it's setting the output from scons -h should or shouldn't contain help from AddOption()'s. I could specify the exact full output expected, but it would seem easier to maintain if I only check for 1 and 2 above. Thanks, Bill ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Does SCons test support negative tests?
I added the functionality for (1) in the CL-patch since I wanted to look for contents without haven't to include stdout of unrelated information. V/R, William On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Gary Oberbrunnerwrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Bill Deegan > wrote: > >> Gary, >> >> For this test I ended up just having the full expected output, in this >> case I effectively checked for the output not being there. >> It worked for the negative case because the output is pretty short. >> >> Can you use must_not_contain on stdout? >> I'm thinking our test framework docs are pretty sparse. >> > > There's a _small_ amount in the wiki, at > https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/DeveloperGuide/TestingMethodology/QMTestMethods > and > https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/DeveloperGuide/TestingMethodology. > The README in the QMTest dir is not all that helpful; that'd be a good > place for some of this IMHO. > > > -- > Gary > > ___ > Scons-dev mailing list > Scons-dev@scons.org > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > > ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev