Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

[Tim Jenness]

You don’t loose anything by redoing the compression. I’m surprised the importer 
didn’t do that as the final pass. The issue is that as commits are added 
incrementally git sometimes can’t spot good compression choices. Running it 
after creation allows for more deltas to be examined.

You will need to repush the repo but none of the history will change so this 
isn’t a huge problem.

> On Sep 24, 2017, at 07:24, Bill Deegan  wrote:
> 
> Also would I need to discard the current repo and create another to push this 
> back to?
> 
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Bill Deegan  > wrote:
> I've not compressed a git repo before, do we lose any information?
> 
> -Bill
> 
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 7:54 AM, anatoly techtonik  > wrote:
> I pushed my repository to https://github.com/techtonik/sconsize 
> 
> and now git clone downloads only 9 Mb instead of 100 Mb,
> 
> $ git clone https://github.com/techtonik/sconsize 
> 
> ...
> Receiving objects: 100% (50034/50034 ), 9.08 MiB | 
> 1.48 MiB/s, done.
> 
> Cloning official repo still takes 10 times longer.
> 
> $ git clone https://github.com/SConsProject/scons 
> 
> ...
> Receiving objects: 100% (51561/51561 ), 109.12 MiB 
> | 1.06 MiB/s, done.
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Dirk Bächle  > wrote:
> > Anatoly,
> >
> >
> > this isn't quite correct. The figures you show here are for
> >
> > - removing the docbook folder, AND
> >
> > - compressing the repository.
> >
> > Your pastebin shows that you don't run a compression *before* removing
> > docbook. If I do a fresh checkout:
> >
> > git clone https://github.com/SConsProject/scons 
> > 
> >
> > and then a
> >
> > git reflog expire --expire=now --all && git gc --prune=now --aggressive
> >
> > I get
> >
> > git count-objects -vH
> >
> > ...
> >
> > size-pack: 12.26 MiB
> >
> > So, compressing the repo is a good idea in general, and I'm totally for it.
> > But removing docbook (which isn't easily possible anyway because our doc
> > toolchain relies on it currently) would save us only 2MB roughly.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > Dirk
> >
> >
> > On 24.09.2017 10 :50, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> >>
> >> Just removing docbook-xsl-1.76.1 brings compressed repository
> >> size from 110.50 MiB down to 10.45 MiB
> >>
> >> https://pastebin.mozilla.org/9068127 
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:50 AM, anatoly techtonik  >> >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> HI Bill.
> >>>
> >>> History is ok, but repository size is now too big.
> >>>
> >>>  Receiving objects: 100% (51561/51561 ), 109.12 
> >>> MiB | 1.08 MiB/s,
> >>> done.
> >>>
> >>> We should take the opportunity to clean up binaries
> >>> and huge commits made by mistake. I am trying to
> >>> see what are they.
> >>>
> >
> > ___
> > Scons-dev mailing list
> > Scons-dev@scons.org 
> > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> anatoly t.
> ___
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev@scons.org 
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev@scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

[Bill Deegan]

Also would I need to discard the current repo and create another to push
this back to?

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Bill Deegan 
wrote:

> I've not compressed a git repo before, do we lose any information?
>
> -Bill
>
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 7:54 AM, anatoly techtonik 
> wrote:
>
>> I pushed my repository to https://github.com/techtonik/sconsize
>> and now git clone downloads only 9 Mb instead of 100 Mb,
>>
>> $ git clone https://github.com/techtonik/sconsize
>> ...
>> Receiving objects: 100% (50034/50034), 9.08 MiB | 1.48 MiB/s, done.
>>
>> Cloning official repo still takes 10 times longer.
>>
>> $ git clone https://github.com/SConsProject/scons
>> ...
>> Receiving objects: 100% (51561/51561), 109.12 MiB | 1.06 MiB/s, done.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Dirk Bächle  wrote:
>> > Anatoly,
>> >
>> >
>> > this isn't quite correct. The figures you show here are for
>> >
>> > - removing the docbook folder, AND
>> >
>> > - compressing the repository.
>> >
>> > Your pastebin shows that you don't run a compression *before* removing
>> > docbook. If I do a fresh checkout:
>> >
>> > git clone https://github.com/SConsProject/scons
>> >
>> > and then a
>> >
>> > git reflog expire --expire=now --all && git gc --prune=now
>> --aggressive
>> >
>> > I get
>> >
>> > git count-objects -vH
>> >
>> > ...
>> >
>> > size-pack: 12.26 MiB
>> >
>> > So, compressing the repo is a good idea in general, and I'm totally for
>> it.
>> > But removing docbook (which isn't easily possible anyway because our doc
>> > toolchain relies on it currently) would save us only 2MB roughly.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> >
>> > Dirk
>> >
>> >
>> > On 24.09.2017 10:50, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Just removing docbook-xsl-1.76.1 brings compressed repository
>> >> size from 110.50 MiB down to 10.45 MiB
>> >>
>> >> https://pastebin.mozilla.org/9068127
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:50 AM, anatoly techtonik <
>> techto...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> HI Bill.
>> >>>
>> >>> History is ok, but repository size is now too big.
>> >>>
>> >>>  Receiving objects: 100% (51561/51561), 109.12 MiB | 1.08 MiB/s,
>> >>> done.
>> >>>
>> >>> We should take the opportunity to clean up binaries
>> >>> and huge commits made by mistake. I am trying to
>> >>> see what are they.
>> >>>
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Scons-dev mailing list
>> > Scons-dev@scons.org
>> > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> anatoly t.
>> ___
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev@scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>
>
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

[Bill Deegan]

I've not compressed a git repo before, do we lose any information?

-Bill

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 7:54 AM, anatoly techtonik 
wrote:

> I pushed my repository to https://github.com/techtonik/sconsize
> and now git clone downloads only 9 Mb instead of 100 Mb,
>
> $ git clone https://github.com/techtonik/sconsize
> ...
> Receiving objects: 100% (50034/50034), 9.08 MiB | 1.48 MiB/s, done.
>
> Cloning official repo still takes 10 times longer.
>
> $ git clone https://github.com/SConsProject/scons
> ...
> Receiving objects: 100% (51561/51561), 109.12 MiB | 1.06 MiB/s, done.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Dirk Bächle  wrote:
> > Anatoly,
> >
> >
> > this isn't quite correct. The figures you show here are for
> >
> > - removing the docbook folder, AND
> >
> > - compressing the repository.
> >
> > Your pastebin shows that you don't run a compression *before* removing
> > docbook. If I do a fresh checkout:
> >
> > git clone https://github.com/SConsProject/scons
> >
> > and then a
> >
> > git reflog expire --expire=now --all && git gc --prune=now
> --aggressive
> >
> > I get
> >
> > git count-objects -vH
> >
> > ...
> >
> > size-pack: 12.26 MiB
> >
> > So, compressing the repo is a good idea in general, and I'm totally for
> it.
> > But removing docbook (which isn't easily possible anyway because our doc
> > toolchain relies on it currently) would save us only 2MB roughly.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > Dirk
> >
> >
> > On 24.09.2017 10:50, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> >>
> >> Just removing docbook-xsl-1.76.1 brings compressed repository
> >> size from 110.50 MiB down to 10.45 MiB
> >>
> >> https://pastebin.mozilla.org/9068127
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:50 AM, anatoly techtonik <
> techto...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> HI Bill.
> >>>
> >>> History is ok, but repository size is now too big.
> >>>
> >>>  Receiving objects: 100% (51561/51561), 109.12 MiB | 1.08 MiB/s,
> >>> done.
> >>>
> >>> We should take the opportunity to clean up binaries
> >>> and huge commits made by mistake. I am trying to
> >>> see what are they.
> >>>
> >
> > ___
> > Scons-dev mailing list
> > Scons-dev@scons.org
> > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
>
> --
> anatoly t.
> ___
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev@scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

[anatoly techtonik]

I pushed my repository to https://github.com/techtonik/sconsize
and now git clone downloads only 9 Mb instead of 100 Mb,

$ git clone https://github.com/techtonik/sconsize
...
Receiving objects: 100% (50034/50034), 9.08 MiB | 1.48 MiB/s, done.

Cloning official repo still takes 10 times longer.

$ git clone https://github.com/SConsProject/scons
...
Receiving objects: 100% (51561/51561), 109.12 MiB | 1.06 MiB/s, done.



On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Dirk Bächle  wrote:
> Anatoly,
>
>
> this isn't quite correct. The figures you show here are for
>
> - removing the docbook folder, AND
>
> - compressing the repository.
>
> Your pastebin shows that you don't run a compression *before* removing
> docbook. If I do a fresh checkout:
>
> git clone https://github.com/SConsProject/scons
>
> and then a
>
> git reflog expire --expire=now --all && git gc --prune=now --aggressive
>
> I get
>
> git count-objects -vH
>
> ...
>
> size-pack: 12.26 MiB
>
> So, compressing the repo is a good idea in general, and I'm totally for it.
> But removing docbook (which isn't easily possible anyway because our doc
> toolchain relies on it currently) would save us only 2MB roughly.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Dirk
>
>
> On 24.09.2017 10:50, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>>
>> Just removing docbook-xsl-1.76.1 brings compressed repository
>> size from 110.50 MiB down to 10.45 MiB
>>
>> https://pastebin.mozilla.org/9068127
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:50 AM, anatoly techtonik 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> HI Bill.
>>>
>>> History is ok, but repository size is now too big.
>>>
>>>  Receiving objects: 100% (51561/51561), 109.12 MiB | 1.08 MiB/s,
>>> done.
>>>
>>> We should take the opportunity to clean up binaries
>>> and huge commits made by mistake. I am trying to
>>> see what are they.
>>>
>
> ___
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev@scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev



-- 
anatoly t.
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

[Dirk Bächle]

Anatoly,


this isn't quite correct. The figures you show here are for

- removing the docbook folder, AND

- compressing the repository.

Your pastebin shows that you don't run a compression *before* removing 
docbook. If I do a fresh checkout:


git clone https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

and then a

git reflog expire --expire=now --all && git gc --prune=now --aggressive

I get

git count-objects -vH

...

size-pack: 12.26 MiB

So, compressing the repo is a good idea in general, and I'm totally for 
it. But removing docbook (which isn't easily possible anyway because our 
doc toolchain relies on it currently) would save us only 2MB roughly.


Regards,


Dirk


On 24.09.2017 10:50, anatoly techtonik wrote:

Just removing docbook-xsl-1.76.1 brings compressed repository
size from 110.50 MiB down to 10.45 MiB

https://pastebin.mozilla.org/9068127

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:50 AM, anatoly techtonik  wrote:

HI Bill.

History is ok, but repository size is now too big.

 Receiving objects: 100% (51561/51561), 109.12 MiB | 1.08 MiB/s, done.

We should take the opportunity to clean up binaries
and huge commits made by mistake. I am trying to
see what are they.



___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

[anatoly techtonik]

Just removing docbook-xsl-1.76.1 brings compressed repository
size from 110.50 MiB down to 10.45 MiB

https://pastebin.mozilla.org/9068127

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:50 AM, anatoly techtonik  wrote:
> HI Bill.
>
> History is ok, but repository size is now too big.
>
> Receiving objects: 100% (51561/51561), 109.12 MiB | 1.08 MiB/s, done.
>
> We should take the opportunity to clean up binaries
> and huge commits made by mistake. I am trying to
> see what are they.
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Bill Deegan  
> wrote:
>> Anatoly,
>>
>> How's this one look?
>> https://github.com/SConsProject/test/commits/master/src/script/scons.py
>>
>> As far as I can tell the hg-fast-import did a proper conversion.
>> Please take a look and let me know if you see any issues, if not,I'll pull
>> the other repo and migrate the changes.
>>
>> -Bill
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Bill Deegan 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> let me try re-converting with hg-fast-import.
>>> The internets say it does a better job.
>>>
>>> -Bill
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Bill Deegan 
>>> wrote:

 Looks that way. This repo was converted earlier than the main one.

 https://github.com/SConsProject/scons-gh-convert-git/commits/master/src/script/scons.py


 On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Bill Deegan 
 wrote:
>
> Must be the conversion from multiple heads to one, and the current one
> was short?
>
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:46 AM, anatoly techtonik 
> wrote:
>>
>> Except that all history is lost on master.
>>
>> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons/commits/master/src/script
>>
>> Blame doesn't show anything useful too.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Jonathon Reinhart
>>  wrote:
>> > I am confident that this was the right move. I see this really
>> > lowering the
>> > barrier to entry for people wishing to contribute.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Bill Deegan
>> > 
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Greetings,
>> >>
>> >> Well the day has finally come.
>> >>
>> >> SCons is moving to Github and git.
>> >>
>> >> Outstanding pull requests on bitbucket.org will need to be migrated
>> >> to the
>> >> new repo.
>> >>
>> >> The bugtracker is still at scons.tigris.org, but will be moved (real
>> >> soon
>> >> now) to github.
>> >> Dirk has a start on a script to migrate from scons.tigris.org, but
>> >> we need
>> >> some help completing the logic to upload the bugs (and their
>> >> attachments) to
>> >> github.
>> >>
>> >> The wiki is still at https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki, but
>> >> will also
>> >> be migrated real soon now.
>> >>
>> >> The Project repo is now at:
>> >>
>> >> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons
>> >>
>> >> There is another test repo we will use to work on migrating the
>> >> issues and
>> >> wiki. Please do not use that repo. (
>> >> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons-gh-convert-git )
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -Bill
>> >> SCons Project Co-Manager
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> Scons-dev mailing list
>> >> Scons-dev@scons.org
>> >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Scons-dev mailing list
>> > Scons-dev@scons.org
>> > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> anatoly t.
>> ___
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev@scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>

>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev@scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> anatoly t.



-- 
anatoly t.
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

[anatoly techtonik]

HI Bill.

History is ok, but repository size is now too big.

Receiving objects: 100% (51561/51561), 109.12 MiB | 1.08 MiB/s, done.

We should take the opportunity to clean up binaries
and huge commits made by mistake. I am trying to
see what are they.


On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Bill Deegan  wrote:
> Anatoly,
>
> How's this one look?
> https://github.com/SConsProject/test/commits/master/src/script/scons.py
>
> As far as I can tell the hg-fast-import did a proper conversion.
> Please take a look and let me know if you see any issues, if not,I'll pull
> the other repo and migrate the changes.
>
> -Bill
>
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Bill Deegan 
> wrote:
>>
>> let me try re-converting with hg-fast-import.
>> The internets say it does a better job.
>>
>> -Bill
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Bill Deegan 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Looks that way. This repo was converted earlier than the main one.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons-gh-convert-git/commits/master/src/script/scons.py
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Bill Deegan 
>>> wrote:

 Must be the conversion from multiple heads to one, and the current one
 was short?

 On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:46 AM, anatoly techtonik 
 wrote:
>
> Except that all history is lost on master.
>
> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons/commits/master/src/script
>
> Blame doesn't show anything useful too.
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Jonathon Reinhart
>  wrote:
> > I am confident that this was the right move. I see this really
> > lowering the
> > barrier to entry for people wishing to contribute.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Bill Deegan
> > 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> Well the day has finally come.
> >>
> >> SCons is moving to Github and git.
> >>
> >> Outstanding pull requests on bitbucket.org will need to be migrated
> >> to the
> >> new repo.
> >>
> >> The bugtracker is still at scons.tigris.org, but will be moved (real
> >> soon
> >> now) to github.
> >> Dirk has a start on a script to migrate from scons.tigris.org, but
> >> we need
> >> some help completing the logic to upload the bugs (and their
> >> attachments) to
> >> github.
> >>
> >> The wiki is still at https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki, but
> >> will also
> >> be migrated real soon now.
> >>
> >> The Project repo is now at:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons
> >>
> >> There is another test repo we will use to work on migrating the
> >> issues and
> >> wiki. Please do not use that repo. (
> >> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons-gh-convert-git )
> >>
> >>
> >> -Bill
> >> SCons Project Co-Manager
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Scons-dev mailing list
> >> Scons-dev@scons.org
> >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Scons-dev mailing list
> > Scons-dev@scons.org
> > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
> >
>
>
>
> --
> anatoly t.
> ___
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev@scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev


>>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev@scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>



-- 
anatoly t.
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

[Bill Deegan]

Anatoly,

How's this one look?
https://github.com/SConsProject/test/commits/master/src/script/scons.py

As far as I can tell the hg-fast-import did a proper conversion.
Please take a look and let me know if you see any issues, if not,I'll pull
the other repo and migrate the changes.

-Bill

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Bill Deegan 
wrote:

> let me try re-converting with hg-fast-import.
> The internets say it does a better job.
>
> -Bill
>
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Bill Deegan 
> wrote:
>
>> Looks that way. This repo was converted earlier than the main one.
>> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons-gh-convert-git/
>> commits/master/src/script/scons.py
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Bill Deegan 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Must be the conversion from multiple heads to one, and the current one
>>> was short?
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:46 AM, anatoly techtonik 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Except that all history is lost on master.

 https://github.com/SConsProject/scons/commits/master/src/script

 Blame doesn't show anything useful too.

 On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Jonathon Reinhart
  wrote:
 > I am confident that this was the right move. I see this really
 lowering the
 > barrier to entry for people wishing to contribute.
 >
 > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Bill Deegan <
 b...@baddogconsulting.com>
 > wrote:
 >>
 >> Greetings,
 >>
 >> Well the day has finally come.
 >>
 >> SCons is moving to Github and git.
 >>
 >> Outstanding pull requests on bitbucket.org will need to be migrated
 to the
 >> new repo.
 >>
 >> The bugtracker is still at scons.tigris.org, but will be moved
 (real soon
 >> now) to github.
 >> Dirk has a start on a script to migrate from scons.tigris.org, but
 we need
 >> some help completing the logic to upload the bugs (and their
 attachments) to
 >> github.
 >>
 >> The wiki is still at https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki, but
 will also
 >> be migrated real soon now.
 >>
 >> The Project repo is now at:
 >>
 >> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons
 >>
 >> There is another test repo we will use to work on migrating the
 issues and
 >> wiki. Please do not use that repo. (
 >> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons-gh-convert-git )
 >>
 >>
 >> -Bill
 >> SCons Project Co-Manager
 >>
 >>
 >> ___
 >> Scons-dev mailing list
 >> Scons-dev@scons.org
 >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
 >>
 >
 >
 > ___
 > Scons-dev mailing list
 > Scons-dev@scons.org
 > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
 >



 --
 anatoly t.
 ___
 Scons-dev mailing list
 Scons-dev@scons.org
 https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

>>>
>>>
>>
>
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

[Bill Deegan]

let me try re-converting with hg-fast-import.
The internets say it does a better job.

-Bill

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Bill Deegan 
wrote:

> Looks that way. This repo was converted earlier than the main one.
> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons-gh-convert-
> git/commits/master/src/script/scons.py
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Bill Deegan 
> wrote:
>
>> Must be the conversion from multiple heads to one, and the current one
>> was short?
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:46 AM, anatoly techtonik 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Except that all history is lost on master.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons/commits/master/src/script
>>>
>>> Blame doesn't show anything useful too.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Jonathon Reinhart
>>>  wrote:
>>> > I am confident that this was the right move. I see this really
>>> lowering the
>>> > barrier to entry for people wishing to contribute.
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Bill Deegan <
>>> b...@baddogconsulting.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Greetings,
>>> >>
>>> >> Well the day has finally come.
>>> >>
>>> >> SCons is moving to Github and git.
>>> >>
>>> >> Outstanding pull requests on bitbucket.org will need to be migrated
>>> to the
>>> >> new repo.
>>> >>
>>> >> The bugtracker is still at scons.tigris.org, but will be moved (real
>>> soon
>>> >> now) to github.
>>> >> Dirk has a start on a script to migrate from scons.tigris.org, but
>>> we need
>>> >> some help completing the logic to upload the bugs (and their
>>> attachments) to
>>> >> github.
>>> >>
>>> >> The wiki is still at https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki, but
>>> will also
>>> >> be migrated real soon now.
>>> >>
>>> >> The Project repo is now at:
>>> >>
>>> >> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons
>>> >>
>>> >> There is another test repo we will use to work on migrating the
>>> issues and
>>> >> wiki. Please do not use that repo. (
>>> >> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons-gh-convert-git )
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> -Bill
>>> >> SCons Project Co-Manager
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ___
>>> >> Scons-dev mailing list
>>> >> Scons-dev@scons.org
>>> >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ___
>>> > Scons-dev mailing list
>>> > Scons-dev@scons.org
>>> > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> anatoly t.
>>> ___
>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>> Scons-dev@scons.org
>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

[Bill Deegan]

Looks that way. This repo was converted earlier than the main one.
https://github.com/SConsProject/scons-gh-convert-git/commits/master/src/script/scons.py


On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Bill Deegan 
wrote:

> Must be the conversion from multiple heads to one, and the current one was
> short?
>
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:46 AM, anatoly techtonik 
> wrote:
>
>> Except that all history is lost on master.
>>
>> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons/commits/master/src/script
>>
>> Blame doesn't show anything useful too.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Jonathon Reinhart
>>  wrote:
>> > I am confident that this was the right move. I see this really lowering
>> the
>> > barrier to entry for people wishing to contribute.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Bill Deegan > >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Greetings,
>> >>
>> >> Well the day has finally come.
>> >>
>> >> SCons is moving to Github and git.
>> >>
>> >> Outstanding pull requests on bitbucket.org will need to be migrated
>> to the
>> >> new repo.
>> >>
>> >> The bugtracker is still at scons.tigris.org, but will be moved (real
>> soon
>> >> now) to github.
>> >> Dirk has a start on a script to migrate from scons.tigris.org, but we
>> need
>> >> some help completing the logic to upload the bugs (and their
>> attachments) to
>> >> github.
>> >>
>> >> The wiki is still at https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki, but will
>> also
>> >> be migrated real soon now.
>> >>
>> >> The Project repo is now at:
>> >>
>> >> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons
>> >>
>> >> There is another test repo we will use to work on migrating the issues
>> and
>> >> wiki. Please do not use that repo. (
>> >> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons-gh-convert-git )
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -Bill
>> >> SCons Project Co-Manager
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> Scons-dev mailing list
>> >> Scons-dev@scons.org
>> >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Scons-dev mailing list
>> > Scons-dev@scons.org
>> > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> anatoly t.
>> ___
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev@scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>
>
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

[Bill Deegan]

Must be the conversion from multiple heads to one, and the current one was
short?

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:46 AM, anatoly techtonik 
wrote:

> Except that all history is lost on master.
>
> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons/commits/master/src/script
>
> Blame doesn't show anything useful too.
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Jonathon Reinhart
>  wrote:
> > I am confident that this was the right move. I see this really lowering
> the
> > barrier to entry for people wishing to contribute.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Bill Deegan 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> Well the day has finally come.
> >>
> >> SCons is moving to Github and git.
> >>
> >> Outstanding pull requests on bitbucket.org will need to be migrated to
> the
> >> new repo.
> >>
> >> The bugtracker is still at scons.tigris.org, but will be moved (real
> soon
> >> now) to github.
> >> Dirk has a start on a script to migrate from scons.tigris.org, but we
> need
> >> some help completing the logic to upload the bugs (and their
> attachments) to
> >> github.
> >>
> >> The wiki is still at https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki, but will
> also
> >> be migrated real soon now.
> >>
> >> The Project repo is now at:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons
> >>
> >> There is another test repo we will use to work on migrating the issues
> and
> >> wiki. Please do not use that repo. (
> >> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons-gh-convert-git )
> >>
> >>
> >> -Bill
> >> SCons Project Co-Manager
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Scons-dev mailing list
> >> Scons-dev@scons.org
> >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Scons-dev mailing list
> > Scons-dev@scons.org
> > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
> >
>
>
>
> --
> anatoly t.
> ___
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev@scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

[Jonathon Reinhart]

I am confident that this was the right move. I see this really lowering the
barrier to entry for people wishing to contribute.

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Bill Deegan 
wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> Well the day has finally come.
>
> SCons is moving to Github and git.
>
> Outstanding pull requests on bitbucket.org will need to be migrated to
> the new repo.
>
> The bugtracker is still at scons.tigris.org, but will be moved (real soon
> now) to github.
> Dirk has a start on a script to migrate from scons.tigris.org, but we
> need some help completing the logic to upload the bugs (and their
> attachments) to github.
>
> The wiki is still at https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki, but will
> also be migrated real soon now.
>
> The Project repo is now at:
>
> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons
>
> There is another test repo we will use to work on migrating the issues and
> wiki. Please do not use that repo. ( https://github.com/
> SConsProject/scons-gh-convert-git )
>
>
> -Bill
> SCons Project Co-Manager
>
>
> ___
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev@scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

[Bill Deegan]

:)

I've made  handful of changes to the github wiki and scons.org.
If you see any wiki pages referring to mercurial/bitbucket.org, please make
an edit or send a note to the users mailing list where and what needs to be
changed.

Thanks,
Bill

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Russel Winder 
wrote:

> Bill,
>
> A sad day and a happy day.
>
> Thanks for all your effort doing the switch.
>
> --
> Russel.
> 
> =
> Dr Russel Winder  t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip:
> sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net
> 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk
> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
> ___
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev@scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

[Russel Winder]

Bill,

A sad day and a happy day. 

Thanks for all your effort doing the switch. 

-- 
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder  t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

[Bill Deegan]

Wiki has been migrated to github.

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Bill Deegan 
wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> Well the day has finally come.
>
> SCons is moving to Github and git.
>
> Outstanding pull requests on bitbucket.org will need to be migrated to
> the new repo.
>
> The bugtracker is still at scons.tigris.org, but will be moved (real soon
> now) to github.
> Dirk has a start on a script to migrate from scons.tigris.org, but we
> need some help completing the logic to upload the bugs (and their
> attachments) to github.
>
> The wiki is still at https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki, but will
> also be migrated real soon now.
>
> The Project repo is now at:
>
> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons
>
> There is another test repo we will use to work on migrating the issues and
> wiki. Please do not use that repo. ( https://github.com/
> SConsProject/scons-gh-convert-git )
>
>
> -Bill
> SCons Project Co-Manager
>
>
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

[Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

[Bill Deegan]

Greetings,

Well the day has finally come.

SCons is moving to Github and git.

Outstanding pull requests on bitbucket.org will need to be migrated to the
new repo.

The bugtracker is still at scons.tigris.org, but will be moved (real soon
now) to github.
Dirk has a start on a script to migrate from scons.tigris.org, but we need
some help completing the logic to upload the bugs (and their attachments)
to github.

The wiki is still at https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki, but will also
be migrated real soon now.

The Project repo is now at:

https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

There is another test repo we will use to work on migrating the issues and
wiki. Please do not use that repo. (
https://github.com/SConsProject/scons-gh-convert-git )


-Bill
SCons Project Co-Manager
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev