Re: [Scons-dev] Test failures with biblattex
On 08.08.2014 03:37, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, Merged. Let's see how that works! Looks good already...one failing test left, for which I opened PR #163. Regards, Dirk ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Test failures with biblattex
On 07.08.2014 01:39, Dirk Bächle wrote: Hi guys, [...] I removed the /tmp/par-* folders, and biber seems to work again (versions of biber and biblatex match locally). In the next days, I'll let another pull request follow to get my Buildslaves green again Okay, I created pull request #162. Bill, can you review this one? Feel free to merge/accept it right away, it should be a fast-forward one... @Rob: In the pull request I'm removing the '.bcf' extension from the test biblatex_plain.py. The TeX file in question doesn't even contain a \bibliography entry, so it's probably too much to expect that a BCF is created. I hope this is okay, please object otherwise... Regards, Dirk ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Test failures with biblattex
Hi Dirk,
While I have no objection I will note that with biblatex version 1.2 the .bcf
file gets generated even for the minimal case of only including the
\usepackage{bib latex}. I am presuming that you have a later version that does
not bother to write out the boilerplate material unless it is actually needed.
Still I think if later versions do not generate the file we can remove it from
the list.
Thanks for fixing this,
Rob
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
Rob Managan email managan at llnl.gov
LLNL phone: 925-423-0903
P.O. Box 808, L-095 FAX: 925-422-3389
Livermore, CA 94551-0808
On 8/7/14, 2:00 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.demailto:tshor...@gmx.de
wrote:
On 07.08.2014 01:39, Dirk Bächle wrote:
Hi guys,
[...]
I removed the /tmp/par-* folders, and biber seems to work again (versions of
biber and biblatex match locally).
In the next days, I'll let another pull request follow to get my Buildslaves
green again
Okay, I created pull request #162. Bill, can you review this one? Feel free to
merge/accept it right away, it should be a fast-forward one...
@Rob: In the pull request I'm removing the '.bcf' extension from the test
biblatex_plain.py. The TeX file in question doesn't even contain a
\bibliography entry, so it's probably too much to expect that a BCF is
created. I hope this is okay, please object otherwise...
Regards,
Dirk
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Test failures with biblattex
Rob, On 08.08.2014 00:04, Managan, Rob wrote: Dirk, I just realized that my desktop got updated to TeXLive 2013 recently and I now have biblatex 2.8 and biber 1.8 available (previously I was using versions 2.2 and 1.2 respectively). With those versions I still get the .bcf file generated. What versions did your system end up with? I am guessing it is an earlier system. I downgraded the SuSE 12.3 box to TeXLive 2012 again, which means biblatex.sty v1.7 and biber v0.9.9. I had the 2013 version first (installed from the internet directly), but then decided to switch to the packages as provided by SuSE...just to get all problems with biblatex/biber out of the way. But maybe the test is now still selecting the wrong bibtex backend? Thanks for your immediate feedback. Dirk ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Test failures with biblattex
Dirk, Thanks for the info. I will assume that the absence of the .bcf file is due to the older versions of biblatex and biber. It makes sense to have the test tailored for old versions and yet still work with newer ones. Your change should allow for that. I tested it on my system and it does pass. Rob *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*- Rob Managan email managan at llnl.gov LLNL phone: 925-423-0903 P.O. Box 808, L-095 FAX: 925-422-3389 Livermore, CA 94551-0808 On 8/7/14, 3:25 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.demailto:tshor...@gmx.de wrote: Rob, On 08.08.2014 00:04, Managan, Rob wrote: Dirk, I just realized that my desktop got updated to TeXLive 2013 recently and I now have biblatex 2.8 and biber 1.8 available (previously I was using versions 2.2 and 1.2 respectively). With those versions I still get the .bcf file generated. What versions did your system end up with? I am guessing it is an earlier system. I downgraded the SuSE 12.3 box to TeXLive 2012 again, which means biblatex.sty v1.7 and biber v0.9.9. I had the 2013 version first (installed from the internet directly), but then decided to switch to the packages as provided by SuSE...just to get all problems with biblatex/biber out of the way. But maybe the test is now still selecting the wrong bibtex backend? Thanks for your immediate feedback. Dirk ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Test failures with biblattex
Dirk, Merged. Let's see how that works! Thanks! -Bill On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote: On 07.08.2014 01:39, Dirk Bächle wrote: Hi guys, [...] I removed the /tmp/par-* folders, and biber seems to work again (versions of biber and biblatex match locally). In the next days, I'll let another pull request follow to get my Buildslaves green again Okay, I created pull request #162. Bill, can you review this one? Feel free to merge/accept it right away, it should be a fast-forward one... @Rob: In the pull request I'm removing the '.bcf' extension from the test biblatex_plain.py. The TeX file in question doesn't even contain a \bibliography entry, so it's probably too much to expect that a BCF is created. I hope this is okay, please object otherwise... Regards, Dirk ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Test failures with biblattex
Hi guys, On 30.07.2014 16:11, Managan, Rob wrote: Hi Bill, For test/TEX/biber_biblatex.py we get: biber returned an error, check the blg file I suspect that the installed version of biber is mismstched with the version of biblatex and errors out. I guess I need to find a way to figure out what version of biber is installed and what version we require. At http://ctan.mirrorcatalogs.com/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex/doc/biblatex.pdf on page 6 I found the chart for what versions of biblatex and biber are compatible. I will email back later when I figure out how to get the version of biblatex. Probably a kpsewhich type call and then look at the top of the biblatex.sty file. I hope biber as an executable will tell you its version with a command line option. More when I get my ancient linux laptop up and running. Same fortest/TEX/biber_biblatex2.py, test/TEX/biblatex.py, and test/TEX/biblatex_plain.py I think I fixed the above errors for the Fedora box. Based on the description in http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/140814/biblatex-biber-fails-with-a-strange-error-about-missing-recode-data-xml-file I removed the /tmp/par-* folders, and biber seems to work again (versions of biber and biblatex match locally). In the next days, I'll let another pull request follow to get my Buildslaves green again Regards, Dirk ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Test failures with biblattex
Hi Bill, For test/TEX/biber_biblatex.py we get: biber returned an error, check the blg file I suspect that the installed version of biber is mismstched with the version of biblatex and errors out. I guess I need to find a way to figure out what version of biber is installed and what version we require. At http://ctan.mirrorcatalogs.com/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex/doc/biblatex.pdf on page 6 I found the chart for what versions of biblatex and biber are compatible. I will email back later when I figure out how to get the version of biblatex. Probably a kpsewhich type call and then look at the top of the biblatex.sty file. I hope biber as an executable will tell you its version with a command line option. More when I get my ancient linux laptop up and running. Same for test/TEX/biber_biblatex2.py, test/TEX/biblatex.py, and test/TEX/biblatex_plain.py What version of fedora is that buildbot have installed by the way. I suspect it is not fedora7 as the name implies. Rob Managan ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Test failures with biblattex
Dirk, What OS is your fedora7 buildbot slave running. Is it still Fedora 7? -Bill On July 30, 2014 at 7:11:30 AM, Managan, Rob (manag...@llnl.gov) wrote: Hi Bill, For test/TEX/biber_biblatex.py we get: biber returned an error, check the blg file I suspect that the installed version of biber is mismstched with the version of biblatex and errors out. I guess I need to find a way to figure out what version of biber is installed and what version we require. At http://ctan.mirrorcatalogs.com/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex/doc/biblatex.pdf on page 6 I found the chart for what versions of biblatex and biber are compatible. I will email back later when I figure out how to get the version of biblatex. Probably a kpsewhich type call and then look at the top of the biblatex.sty file. I hope biber as an executable will tell you its version with a command line option. More when I get my ancient linux laptop up and running. Same for test/TEX/biber_biblatex2.py, test/TEX/biblatex.py, and test/TEX/biblatex_plain.py What version of fedora is that buildbot have installed by the way. I suspect it is not fedora7 as the name implies. Rob Managan ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Test failures with biblattex
Hi, On 30.07.2014 19:05, William Deegan wrote: Dirk, What OS is your fedora7 buildbot slave running. Is it still Fedora 7? it's running Fedora17, as the info page correctly states: http://buildbot.scons.org/buildslaves/fedora-17 . It's just the slave's name that somehow (*cough*) got wrong. ;) Regards, Dirk ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Test failures with biblattex
Dirk, I can change the name to 17 and restart if you can update the slave on your side? -Bill On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, On 30.07.2014 19:05, William Deegan wrote: Dirk, What OS is your fedora7 buildbot slave running. Is it still Fedora 7? it's running Fedora17, as the info page correctly states: http://buildbot.scons.org/buildslaves/fedora-17 . It's just the slave's name that somehow (*cough*) got wrong. ;) Regards, Dirk ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Test failures with biblattex
On 30.07.2014 19:59, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, I can change the name to 17 and restart if you can update the slave on your side? -Bill Okay, let's do that. Do I have to change some config first, or do I restart the slave right away? Dirk ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Test failures with biblattex
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 19:57 +0200, Dirk Bächle wrote: it's running Fedora17, as the info page correctly states: Isn't Fedora 17 just a teensy weensy bit out of date? (given Fedora 20 is current and 21 pending?) -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Test failures with biblattex
Hi Russel, On 30.07.2014 22:18, Russel Winder wrote: On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 19:57 +0200, Dirk Bächle wrote: it's running Fedora17, as the info page correctly states: Isn't Fedora 17 just a teensy weensy bit out of date? (given Fedora 20 is current and 21 pending?) yes, but my understanding is that it's not required to always have the latest version of every OS running. I even regard it to be a little counter-productive for a system like Buildbot, which helps us to keep SCons working on a variety (!) of platforms. As long as Python 2.7 runs on it, the OS should be good enough for testing and actually working with it... Dirk ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
[Scons-dev] Test failures with biblattex
Can someone who understands latex and these tests take a look at the failures on buildbot? http://buildbot.scons.org:8010/builders/fedora7-python-2.7/builds/126/steps/shell/logs/stdio test/TEX/biber_biblatex.py test/TEX/biber_biblatex2.py test/TEX/biblatex.py test/TEX/biblatex_plain.py Thanks, Bill ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
