Re: [Scons-dev] Using SHLIBVERSION fails on Solaris and probably all other unixes but Linux

2014-09-21 Thread alexandre . feblot
Pull request created: 
https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-request/186/attempt-to-fix-versionned-shared-library


Le 19 sept. 2014 à 22:54, alexandre.feb...@gmail.com a écrit :

> I may, but I'm pretty sure my patch is OK for me but only for me, and I've no 
> real clue on what is the correct way to fix this in all situations.
> 
> Le 19 sept. 2014 à 21:48, William Blevins  a écrit :
> 
>> Would you mind making a pull request via Bitbucket?
>> 
>> On Sep 19, 2014 1:03 PM, "Alexandre Feblot"  wrote:
>> The change on SCons/Tool/__init__.py line 308 was a bad idea, it broke 
>> Solaris build.
>> Attached is my final patch which seem to work properly.
>> 
>> 2014-09-19 17:36 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Feblot :
>> So, I fixed point 2 by adding the same kind of fixes ( or platform == 
>> 'sunos') on :
>> 
>> * required for sure:
>> SCons/Tool/__init__.py line 259
>> 
>> SCons/Tool/__init__.py line 308
>> 
>> 
>> * not required but seems related, I don't really know:
>> SCons/Tool/install.py" line 152
>> 
>> SCons/Tool/install.py" line 163
>> 
>> 
>> 2014-09-19 15:30 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Feblot :
>> Hi,
>> 
>> as the title says, it fails with the following error:" IndexError: list 
>> index out of range" in SCons/Tool/link.py.
>> 
>> The reason is that versionned shared lib seem to be handled properly for 
>> unixes if PLATFORM=='posix', whereas on Solaris, it is detected as"sunos" 
>> rather than "posix".
>> 
>> 
>> I tried to fix at SCons/Tool/link.py line 108: if platform == 'posix' or 
>> platform == 'sunos':, but
>> This is an ugly fix which does not take into account other unixes which 
>> probably fail the same way. In fact, 'posix' is not at the same meaning 
>> level as 'sunos'. Shouldn't PLATFORM be set to something like 'linux' on 
>> linux, and a posix flag to be set for all posix platforms?
>> This just fixes part of the issue. It now does create the lib with its 
>> version number, but not the 2 symlinks (and I don't really kow where to 
>> search for that. Any hint will be welcome).
>> 
>> Note: I'd be happy to fill a bug, but should this still be done on Tigris, 
>> with ongoing migrations to new bug trackers (and I'm totally lost with the 
>> current status of these migrations)?
>> 
>> Attached: the smallest example to reproduce the issue.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev@scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>> 
>> ___
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev@scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
> 

___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev


Re: [Scons-dev] Using SHLIBVERSION fails on Solaris and probably all other unixes but Linux

2014-09-19 Thread alexandre . feblot
I may, but I'm pretty sure my patch is OK for me but only for me, and I've no 
real clue on what is the correct way to fix this in all situations.

Le 19 sept. 2014 à 21:48, William Blevins  a écrit :

> Would you mind making a pull request via Bitbucket?
> 
> On Sep 19, 2014 1:03 PM, "Alexandre Feblot"  wrote:
> The change on SCons/Tool/__init__.py line 308 was a bad idea, it broke 
> Solaris build.
> Attached is my final patch which seem to work properly.
> 
> 2014-09-19 17:36 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Feblot :
> So, I fixed point 2 by adding the same kind of fixes ( or platform == 
> 'sunos') on :
> 
> * required for sure:
> SCons/Tool/__init__.py line 259
> 
> SCons/Tool/__init__.py line 308
> 
> 
> * not required but seems related, I don't really know:
> SCons/Tool/install.py" line 152
> 
> SCons/Tool/install.py" line 163
> 
> 
> 2014-09-19 15:30 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Feblot :
> Hi,
> 
> as the title says, it fails with the following error:" IndexError: list index 
> out of range" in SCons/Tool/link.py.
> 
> The reason is that versionned shared lib seem to be handled properly for 
> unixes if PLATFORM=='posix', whereas on Solaris, it is detected as"sunos" 
> rather than "posix".
> 
> 
> I tried to fix at SCons/Tool/link.py line 108: if platform == 'posix' or 
> platform == 'sunos':, but
> This is an ugly fix which does not take into account other unixes which 
> probably fail the same way. In fact, 'posix' is not at the same meaning level 
> as 'sunos'. Shouldn't PLATFORM be set to something like 'linux' on linux, and 
> a posix flag to be set for all posix platforms?
> This just fixes part of the issue. It now does create the lib with its 
> version number, but not the 2 symlinks (and I don't really kow where to 
> search for that. Any hint will be welcome).
> 
> Note: I'd be happy to fill a bug, but should this still be done on Tigris, 
> with ongoing migrations to new bug trackers (and I'm totally lost with the 
> current status of these migrations)?
> 
> Attached: the smallest example to reproduce the issue.
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev@scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
> 
> ___
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev@scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev


Re: [Scons-dev] Using SHLIBVERSION fails on Solaris and probably all other unixes but Linux

2014-09-19 Thread William Blevins
Would you mind making a pull request via Bitbucket?
On Sep 19, 2014 1:03 PM, "Alexandre Feblot"  wrote:

> The change on SCons/Tool/__init__.py line 308 was a bad idea, it broke
> Solaris build.
> Attached is my final patch which seem to work properly.
>
> 2014-09-19 17:36 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Feblot :
>
>> So, I fixed point 2 by adding the same kind of fixes ( or platform ==
>> 'sunos') on :
>>
>> * required for sure:
>>
>> SCons/Tool/__init__.py line 259
>>
>> SCons/Tool/__init__.py line 308
>>
>> * not required but seems related, I don't really know:
>>
>> SCons/Tool/install.py" line 152
>>
>> SCons/Tool/install.py" line 163
>>
>> 2014-09-19 15:30 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Feblot :
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> as the title says, it fails with the following error:" IndexError: list
>>> index out of range" in SCons/Tool/link.py.
>>>
>>> The reason is that versionned shared lib seem to be handled properly for
>>> unixes if PLATFORM=='posix', whereas on Solaris, it is detected as"sunos"
>>> rather than "posix".
>>>
>>>
>>> I tried to fix at SCons/Tool/link.py line 108: if platform == 'posix'
>>> or platform == 'sunos':, but
>>>
>>>1. This is an ugly fix which does not take into account other unixes
>>>which probably fail the same way. In fact, 'posix' is not at the same
>>>meaning level as 'sunos'. Shouldn't PLATFORM be set to something like
>>>'linux' on linux, and a posix flag to be set for all posix platforms?
>>>2. This just fixes part of the issue. It now does create the lib
>>>with its version number, but not the 2 symlinks (and I don't really kow
>>>where to search for that. Any hint will be welcome).
>>>
>>>
>>> Note: I'd be happy to fill a bug, but should this still be done on
>>> Tigris, with ongoing migrations to new bug trackers (and I'm totally lost
>>> with the current status of these migrations)?
>>>
>>> Attached: the smallest example to reproduce the issue.
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev@scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev


Re: [Scons-dev] Using SHLIBVERSION fails on Solaris and probably all other unixes but Linux

2014-09-19 Thread Alexandre Feblot
The change on SCons/Tool/__init__.py line 308 was a bad idea, it broke
Solaris build.
Attached is my final patch which seem to work properly.

2014-09-19 17:36 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Feblot :

> So, I fixed point 2 by adding the same kind of fixes ( or platform ==
> 'sunos') on :
>
> * required for sure:
>
> SCons/Tool/__init__.py line 259
>
> SCons/Tool/__init__.py line 308
>
> * not required but seems related, I don't really know:
>
> SCons/Tool/install.py" line 152
>
> SCons/Tool/install.py" line 163
>
> 2014-09-19 15:30 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Feblot :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> as the title says, it fails with the following error:" IndexError: list
>> index out of range" in SCons/Tool/link.py.
>>
>> The reason is that versionned shared lib seem to be handled properly for
>> unixes if PLATFORM=='posix', whereas on Solaris, it is detected as"sunos"
>> rather than "posix".
>>
>>
>> I tried to fix at SCons/Tool/link.py line 108: if platform == 'posix' or
>> platform == 'sunos':, but
>>
>>1. This is an ugly fix which does not take into account other unixes
>>which probably fail the same way. In fact, 'posix' is not at the same
>>meaning level as 'sunos'. Shouldn't PLATFORM be set to something like
>>'linux' on linux, and a posix flag to be set for all posix platforms?
>>2. This just fixes part of the issue. It now does create the lib with
>>its version number, but not the 2 symlinks (and I don't really kow where 
>> to
>>search for that. Any hint will be welcome).
>>
>>
>> Note: I'd be happy to fill a bug, but should this still be done on
>> Tigris, with ongoing migrations to new bug trackers (and I'm totally lost
>> with the current status of these migrations)?
>>
>> Attached: the smallest example to reproduce the issue.
>>
>
>


scons-2.3.3.fixSolarisVersionnedSharedLib.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev


Re: [Scons-dev] Using SHLIBVERSION fails on Solaris and probably all other unixes but Linux

2014-09-19 Thread Alexandre Feblot
So, I fixed point 2 by adding the same kind of fixes ( or platform ==
'sunos') on :

* required for sure:

SCons/Tool/__init__.py line 259

SCons/Tool/__init__.py line 308

* not required but seems related, I don't really know:

SCons/Tool/install.py" line 152

SCons/Tool/install.py" line 163

2014-09-19 15:30 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Feblot :

> Hi,
>
> as the title says, it fails with the following error:" IndexError: list
> index out of range" in SCons/Tool/link.py.
>
> The reason is that versionned shared lib seem to be handled properly for
> unixes if PLATFORM=='posix', whereas on Solaris, it is detected as"sunos"
> rather than "posix".
>
>
> I tried to fix at SCons/Tool/link.py line 108: if platform == 'posix' or
> platform == 'sunos':, but
>
>1. This is an ugly fix which does not take into account other unixes
>which probably fail the same way. In fact, 'posix' is not at the same
>meaning level as 'sunos'. Shouldn't PLATFORM be set to something like
>'linux' on linux, and a posix flag to be set for all posix platforms?
>2. This just fixes part of the issue. It now does create the lib with
>its version number, but not the 2 symlinks (and I don't really kow where to
>search for that. Any hint will be welcome).
>
>
> Note: I'd be happy to fill a bug, but should this still be done on Tigris,
> with ongoing migrations to new bug trackers (and I'm totally lost with the
> current status of these migrations)?
>
> Attached: the smallest example to reproduce the issue.
>
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev


[Scons-dev] Using SHLIBVERSION fails on Solaris and probably all other unixes but Linux

2014-09-19 Thread Alexandre Feblot
Hi,

as the title says, it fails with the following error:" IndexError: list
index out of range" in SCons/Tool/link.py.

The reason is that versionned shared lib seem to be handled properly for
unixes if PLATFORM=='posix', whereas on Solaris, it is detected as"sunos"
rather than "posix".


I tried to fix at SCons/Tool/link.py line 108: if platform == 'posix' or
platform == 'sunos':, but

   1. This is an ugly fix which does not take into account other unixes
   which probably fail the same way. In fact, 'posix' is not at the same
   meaning level as 'sunos'. Shouldn't PLATFORM be set to something like
   'linux' on linux, and a posix flag to be set for all posix platforms?
   2. This just fixes part of the issue. It now does create the lib with
   its version number, but not the 2 symlinks (and I don't really kow where to
   search for that. Any hint will be welcome).


Note: I'd be happy to fill a bug, but should this still be done on Tigris,
with ongoing migrations to new bug trackers (and I'm totally lost with the
current status of these migrations)?

Attached: the smallest example to reproduce the issue.


bugSconsSharedLib.tar
Description: Unix tar archive
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev