[SeaBIOS] Re: Regression 32bit Kernel + Virtio-scsi
Hi, > So from a "will this change stop my production VM from booting" perspective, > there's no magic number here, though 64G certainly seems like a very > reasonable > cutoff point - beyond having to fix up the VM config, there's no possible way > that could affect any actual workload in practice. > > Although this actually works at 63G, right, due to the memory layout? I think it makes sense to check for "RamSizeOver4G > 60GB" then. On q35 machine type this will actually be 62GB RAM + 2GB mmio window (below 4G), on pc machine type this will indeed be 63GB RAM + 1GB mmio window. > I have a patch series that implements the above if you're interested... Series? I'd expect a single one-line patch updating the checks, but sure, send it along. take care, Gerd ___ SeaBIOS mailing list -- seabios@seabios.org To unsubscribe send an email to seabios-le...@seabios.org
[SeaBIOS] Re: Regression 32bit Kernel + Virtio-scsi
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 03:30:18PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > I see that no change has been made to seabios for this regression. Is it the > > position of the maintainers that such guest VMs are no longer supported by > > seabios, and anyone doing so is responsible for patching as necessary? > > Or would there still be interest in fixing this up in master? > > So, in short, can you (or anyone else running into this) share some > information what the typical / maximal amount of memory is for 32-bit > guests in real world deployments? I asked internally for some production details - it's partial information, but still indicative. The sizable majority of deployments are indeed at 4G or below. However there is in fact a non-trivial minority with 4G-64G configured, and even a few over 64G! Presumably nobody ever noticed the latter cases weren't actually using that memory. So from a "will this change stop my production VM from booting" perspective, there's no magic number here, though 64G certainly seems like a very reasonable cutoff point - beyond having to fix up the VM config, there's no possible way that could affect any actual workload in practice. Although this actually works at 63G, right, due to the memory layout? I have a patch series that implements the above if you're interested... regards john ___ SeaBIOS mailing list -- seabios@seabios.org To unsubscribe send an email to seabios-le...@seabios.org
[SeaBIOS] Re: Regression 32bit Kernel + Virtio-scsi
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 04:15:06PM GMT, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 04:00:34PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:56:05AM +, Max Tottenham wrote:
> > > On 02/26, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > > Recommended action: turn off 64-bit support (long mode) in the cpu:
> > > >
> > > > qemu -cpu host,lm=off
> > >
> > > Hi Gerd
> > >
> > > Thanks for the response,
> > >
> > > that gets the VM booting - unfortunately we have many customers who may
> > > be running 32bit distro kernels - we won't know ahead of time before
> > > launching the VM whether they need this compatibility flag or not, I
> > > don't think we can use this as a suitable work-around.
> >
> > You can turn this off completely this way:
>
> Apologies for resurrecting this old thread. We have just hit this case.
>
> > +#if 0
> > if (CPUPhysBits >= 36 && CPULongMode && RamSizeOver4G)
> > pci_pad_mem64 = 1;
> > +#endif
> >
> > dprintf(1, "=== PCI bus & bridge init ===\n");
> > if (pci_probe_host() != 0) {
> >
> > Another option would be to try tweak the condition which turns on
> > pci_pad_mem64. The obvious candidate would be to raise the memory
> > limit, i.e. turn this on only in case memory is present above 64G
> > (outside the PAE-addressable physical address space), or choose
> > some value between 4G and 64G.
> >
> > I'm wondering how widespread it is in 2024 to run 32bit kernels with
> > alot of memory?
>
> I see that no change has been made to seabios for this regression. Is it the
> position of the maintainers that such guest VMs are no longer supported by
> seabios, and anyone doing so is responsible for patching as necessary?
> Or would there still be interest in fixing this up in master?
Well, the discussion simply died, while I was hoping for some feedback
to figure how the heuristics can be adjusted best ...
Managing memory larger than the virtual address space comes with a
performance penalty because it is not possible to map all memory
permanently. So a 32-bit kernel has to do more page table updates
than a 64-bit kernel because any access to HIGHMEM requires mapping
changes.
The more memory a 32-bit kernel has to manage the higher the performance
penalty is. Not only due to more HIGHMEM mapping operations, but also
because the amount of LOWMEM (permanently mapped) memory needed to
manage the memory (i.e. the 'struct page' array in case of linux) goes
up, increasing the memory pressure in LOWMEM.
So my naive expectation would be that 32-bit guests have relatively
small amounts of memory assigned, where the performance hit isn't too
much of a problem. I have no idea whenever this is actually the case
though.
So, in short, can you (or anyone else running into this) share some
information what the typical / maximal amount of memory is for 32-bit
guests in real world deployments?
thanks & take care,
Gerd
___
SeaBIOS mailing list -- seabios@seabios.org
To unsubscribe send an email to seabios-le...@seabios.org
[SeaBIOS] Re: Regression 32bit Kernel + Virtio-scsi
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 04:00:34PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:56:05AM +, Max Tottenham wrote:
> > On 02/26, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > Recommended action: turn off 64-bit support (long mode) in the cpu:
> > >
> > > qemu -cpu host,lm=off
> >
> > Hi Gerd
> >
> > Thanks for the response,
> >
> > that gets the VM booting - unfortunately we have many customers who may
> > be running 32bit distro kernels - we won't know ahead of time before
> > launching the VM whether they need this compatibility flag or not, I
> > don't think we can use this as a suitable work-around.
>
> You can turn this off completely this way:
Apologies for resurrecting this old thread. We have just hit this case.
> +#if 0
> if (CPUPhysBits >= 36 && CPULongMode && RamSizeOver4G)
> pci_pad_mem64 = 1;
> +#endif
>
> dprintf(1, "=== PCI bus & bridge init ===\n");
> if (pci_probe_host() != 0) {
>
> Another option would be to try tweak the condition which turns on
> pci_pad_mem64. The obvious candidate would be to raise the memory
> limit, i.e. turn this on only in case memory is present above 64G
> (outside the PAE-addressable physical address space), or choose
> some value between 4G and 64G.
>
> I'm wondering how widespread it is in 2024 to run 32bit kernels with
> alot of memory?
I see that no change has been made to seabios for this regression. Is it the
position of the maintainers that such guest VMs are no longer supported by
seabios, and anyone doing so is responsible for patching as necessary?
Or would there still be interest in fixing this up in master?
thanks
john
___
SeaBIOS mailing list -- seabios@seabios.org
To unsubscribe send an email to seabios-le...@seabios.org
