Re: RFR: JDK-6725221 Standardize obtaining boolean properties with defaults [v2]

2022-05-24 Thread Bradford Wetmore
On Tue, 24 May 2022 16:20:10 GMT, Mark Powers  wrote:

> Mach5 tier1 and tier2 completed without any failures. I don't know what to 
> make of the pre-submit failures - lang and hotspot?

IIUC, these are due to Loom failures in some of the other platforms supported 
by OpenJDK but not by Oracle.  They are being resolved.

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8559


Re: RFR: JDK-6725221 Standardize obtaining boolean properties with defaults [v2]

2022-05-24 Thread Mark Powers
On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:58:34 GMT, Mark Powers  wrote:

>> JDK-6725221 Standardize obtaining boolean properties with defaults
>
> Mark Powers has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains six commits:
> 
>  - Alan and Jamil comments
>  - Merge
>  - reverse true.equals and false.equals changes
>  - Merge
>  - Merge
>  - first iteration

Mach5 tier1 and tier2 completed without any failures. I don't know what to make 
of the pre-submit failures - lang and hotspot?

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8559


Re: RFR: JDK-6725221 Standardize obtaining boolean properties with defaults [v2]

2022-05-23 Thread Roger Riggs
On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:58:34 GMT, Mark Powers  wrote:

>> JDK-6725221 Standardize obtaining boolean properties with defaults
>
> Mark Powers has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains six commits:
> 
>  - Alan and Jamil comments
>  - Merge
>  - reverse true.equals and false.equals changes
>  - Merge
>  - Merge
>  - first iteration

LGTM

-

Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8559


Re: RFR: JDK-6725221 Standardize obtaining boolean properties with defaults [v2]

2022-05-23 Thread Mark Powers
On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:34:41 GMT, Roger Riggs  wrote:

>> You are right. The old way maps the null string to true, and the new way 
>> maps it to false. I did not notice that. At this point, I see no value in 
>> making the "true".equals and "false".equals changes. Too much can break. 
>> I'll reverse these changes.
>
> This change still needs to be reversed.

The change has been reversed.

We had an internal discussion about IntelliJ's unboxing recommendation, and 
decided to let unboxing be a matter of personal preference. Those changes have 
been reversed too.

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8559


Re: RFR: JDK-6725221 Standardize obtaining boolean properties with defaults [v2]

2022-05-23 Thread Mark Powers
> JDK-6725221 Standardize obtaining boolean properties with defaults

Mark Powers has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge 
or a rebase. The pull request now contains six commits:

 - Alan and Jamil comments
 - Merge
 - reverse true.equals and false.equals changes
 - Merge
 - Merge
 - first iteration

-

Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8559/files
 Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=8559=01
  Stats: 9 lines in 3 files changed: 1 ins; 1 del; 7 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8559.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/8559/head:pull/8559

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8559