RFR 8244674: Third-party code version check

2020-05-08 Thread Weijun Wang
Please take a review at

   https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8244674/webrev.00

I've consolidated 2 old tests into one and added a new case.

Thanks,
Max



Re: RFR 8244674: Third-party code version check

2020-05-10 Thread Weijun Wang
Sorry, send the wrong reply. Please ignore this mail.

> On May 11, 2020, at 10:50 AM, Weijun Wang  wrote:
> 
> Can you update the existing TimeStampCheck test to use this class? I know 
> that test can simulate some error conditions. Maybe you can add one or more 
> virtual methods in this class so  TimeStampCheck can override them.
> 
> getDefaultSigAlgo(): Please call AlgorithmId.getDefaultSigAlgForKey() 
> instead. It will be enhanced to support new algorithm.
> 
> Param: How about making it a JDK 14 record?
> 
> Thanks,
> Max
> 
> 
>> On May 9, 2020, at 11:29 AM, Weijun Wang  wrote:
>> 
>> Please take a review at
>> 
>>  https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8244674/webrev.00
>> 
>> I've consolidated 2 old tests into one and added a new case.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Max
>> 
> 



Re: RFR 8244674: Third-party code version check

2020-05-10 Thread Weijun Wang
Can you update the existing TimeStampCheck test to use this class? I know that 
test can simulate some error conditions. Maybe you can add one or more virtual 
methods in this class so  TimeStampCheck can override them.

getDefaultSigAlgo(): Please call AlgorithmId.getDefaultSigAlgForKey() instead. 
It will be enhanced to support new algorithm.

Param: How about making it a JDK 14 record?

Thanks,
Max


> On May 9, 2020, at 11:29 AM, Weijun Wang  wrote:
> 
> Please take a review at
> 
>   https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8244674/webrev.00
> 
> I've consolidated 2 old tests into one and added a new case.
> 
> Thanks,
> Max
> 



Re: RFR 8244674: Third-party code version check

2020-05-11 Thread Sean Mullan

Looks good to me.

--Sean

On 5/8/20 11:29 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:

Please take a review at

https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8244674/webrev.00

I've consolidated 2 old tests into one and added a new case.

Thanks,
Max