Re: [POLL] James 3.0 Milestone 1...?
On 7/19/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the milestone would be an official release but just a technology > preview with no guarantees about compatibility with the actual 3 > series releases (whenever they happen). responses to the POLL: +1 Timothy Collett +1 Paulo Sergio +1 Mike Heath +1 Soren Hilmer +1 Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini +1 Serge Knystautas +1 norman +1 Stefano Bagnara +1 Bernd Fondermann seems to be a consensus that some kind of technology preview for 3.0 would be good so, let's get started on the details - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [POLL] James 3.0 Milestone 1...?
+1 On Thursday 19 July 2007 14:01, robert burrell donkin wrote: > the code in trunk has a ton of new features > (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/james-server-dev/200707.mbox/brow >ser) > > i think that the upcoming spring integration might be a good excuse to > cut a milestone from trunk and christen it 3.0 milestone 1. yes, > there's work to be done (on the build, auditing the licenses, making > sure that everyone's happen with policy for milestones, cutting > releases for component sub-projects) but this is only a poll to see > whether people think it would be a good idea or not. > > the milestone would be an official release but just a technology > preview with no guarantees about compatibility with the actual 3 > series releases (whenever they happen). > > - robert > > [ ] +1 Great! > [ ] +0 Yeh, whatever > [ ] -0 Whatever > [ ] -1 Do I Look bovverd? > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Søren Hilmer, M.Sc., M.Crypt. wideTrail Phone: +45 25481225 Pilevænget 41 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DK-8961 Allingåbro Web: www.widetrail.dk - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [POLL] James 3.0 Milestone 1...?
+1 Release early. Release often. On 7/20/07, Paulo Sergio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 On 7/20/07, Timothy Collett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 > > Timothy Collett > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [POLL] James 3.0 Milestone 1...?
+1 On 7/20/07, Timothy Collett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 Timothy Collett - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [POLL] James 3.0 Milestone 1...?
+1 Timothy Collett - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [POLL] James 3.0 Milestone 1...?
[X] +1 Great! Vincenzo robert burrell donkin wrote: the code in trunk has a ton of new features (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/james-server-dev/200707.mbox/browser) i think that the upcoming spring integration might be a good excuse to cut a milestone from trunk and christen it 3.0 milestone 1. yes, there's work to be done (on the build, auditing the licenses, making sure that everyone's happen with policy for milestones, cutting releases for component sub-projects) but this is only a poll to see whether people think it would be a good idea or not. the milestone would be an official release but just a technology preview with no guarantees about compatibility with the actual 3 series releases (whenever they happen). - robert [ ] +1 Great! [ ] +0 Yeh, whatever [ ] -0 Whatever [ ] -1 Do I Look bovverd? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [POLL] James 3.0 Milestone 1...?
On 7/19/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the milestone would be an official release but just a technology preview with no guarantees about compatibility with the actual 3 series releases (whenever they happen). +1 -- Serge Knystautas Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [POLL] James 3.0 Milestone 1...?
Am Donnerstag, den 19.07.2007, 15:37 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > norman ha scritto: > > Am Donnerstag, den 19.07.2007, 14:34 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > >> I already have the needed local changes ready to be committed (together > >> with an update of any other library we depend on), but I'm waiting for > >> official jars before committing them. *WHEN* they will be published I > >> will commit them, whether you already cut the M1 or not. > >> > >> Stefano > > > > > > I think we should wait till they are released before cut the milestone. > > > > bye > > Norman > > I warn you that excalibur-dev votes are usually slower than JAMES votes > ;-) . I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack > ships^H?H^H^H^H^H^H I saw votes running for more than 2 weeks ;-) > > Stefano Lol... ;-) bye Norman - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [POLL] James 3.0 Milestone 1...?
norman ha scritto: > Am Donnerstag, den 19.07.2007, 14:34 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: >> I already have the needed local changes ready to be committed (together >> with an update of any other library we depend on), but I'm waiting for >> official jars before committing them. *WHEN* they will be published I >> will commit them, whether you already cut the M1 or not. >> >> Stefano > > > I think we should wait till they are released before cut the milestone. > > bye > Norman I warn you that excalibur-dev votes are usually slower than JAMES votes ;-) . I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships^H?H^H^H^H^H^H I saw votes running for more than 2 weeks ;-) Stefano - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [POLL] James 3.0 Milestone 1...?
On 7/19/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [X ] +1 Great! Bernd - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [POLL] James 3.0 Milestone 1...?
Am Donnerstag, den 19.07.2007, 14:34 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > robert burrell donkin ha scritto: > > the code in trunk has a ton of new features > > (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/james-server-dev/200707.mbox/browser) > > Here is the link to the specific message where I tried to summarize the > major changes: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/james-server-dev/200707.mbox/<[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> > > > i think that the upcoming spring integration might be a good excuse to > > cut a milestone from trunk and christen it 3.0 milestone 1. yes, > > there's work to be done (on the build, auditing the licenses, making > > sure that everyone's happen with policy for milestones, cutting > > releases for component sub-projects) but this is only a poll to see > > whether people think it would be a good idea or not. > > > > the milestone would be an official release but just a technology > > preview with no guarantees about compatibility with the actual 3 > > series releases (whenever they happen). > > [X] +1 Great! > > A vote to publish cornerstone libraries 2.2.3 is on the way in excalibur > list: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/excalibur-dev/200707.mbox/<[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> > > I already have the needed local changes ready to be committed (together > with an update of any other library we depend on), but I'm waiting for > official jars before committing them. *WHEN* they will be published I > will commit them, whether you already cut the M1 or not. > > Stefano I think we should wait till they are released before cut the milestone. bye Norman - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [POLL] James 3.0 Milestone 1...?
Am Donnerstag, den 19.07.2007, 13:01 +0100 schrieb robert burrell donkin: > > [x] +1 Great! > [ ] +0 Yeh, whatever > [ ] -0 Whatever > [ ] -1 Do I Look bovverd? I whould be very happy if we can cut a milestone after such a long time. bye Norman - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [POLL] James 3.0 Milestone 1...?
robert burrell donkin ha scritto: > the code in trunk has a ton of new features > (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/james-server-dev/200707.mbox/browser) Here is the link to the specific message where I tried to summarize the major changes: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/james-server-dev/200707.mbox/<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > i think that the upcoming spring integration might be a good excuse to > cut a milestone from trunk and christen it 3.0 milestone 1. yes, > there's work to be done (on the build, auditing the licenses, making > sure that everyone's happen with policy for milestones, cutting > releases for component sub-projects) but this is only a poll to see > whether people think it would be a good idea or not. > > the milestone would be an official release but just a technology > preview with no guarantees about compatibility with the actual 3 > series releases (whenever they happen). [X] +1 Great! A vote to publish cornerstone libraries 2.2.3 is on the way in excalibur list: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/excalibur-dev/200707.mbox/<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I already have the needed local changes ready to be committed (together with an update of any other library we depend on), but I'm waiting for official jars before committing them. *WHEN* they will be published I will commit them, whether you already cut the M1 or not. Stefano - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[POLL] James 3.0 Milestone 1...?
the code in trunk has a ton of new features (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/james-server-dev/200707.mbox/browser) i think that the upcoming spring integration might be a good excuse to cut a milestone from trunk and christen it 3.0 milestone 1. yes, there's work to be done (on the build, auditing the licenses, making sure that everyone's happen with policy for milestones, cutting releases for component sub-projects) but this is only a poll to see whether people think it would be a good idea or not. the milestone would be an official release but just a technology preview with no guarantees about compatibility with the actual 3 series releases (whenever they happen). - robert [ ] +1 Great! [ ] +0 Yeh, whatever [ ] -0 Whatever [ ] -1 Do I Look bovverd? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
