Re: Multiple Databases?
Hi Jerry, There is currently no solution to do what you describe. There is no "custom storage treatment" for archived mails. I did not address nor faced this problem, thus can not really help you. Cheers, Benoit Tellier Le 09/05/2018 à 02:08, Jerry Malcolm a écrit : > I realize this is a completely off-the-wall question... but has there > been any discussion about breaking the JAMES db into multiple > databases? I have a bunch of clients, each with a bunch of accounts. > And they all want to archive all of their mail and be able to access it > through the same mail client. As the years go by, the db just keeps > growing and growing. This became acutely obvious when I was recently > forced by my server provider to migrate to newer hardware, and I > realized I had to have mail down for a long time while I transferred a > 60gB+ file across a slow connection to the new server. The db size is > also making daily backups a problem. > > The reality is that 90% of the mail is archived into 'year' folders for > each of the accounts which are basically "read-only" now. Only a > relatively small amount of mail is truly in dynamically updated > folders. If there was a way to store "/archives/2002" folders through > "/archives/2017" folders in one db and all of the other folders in > another db, it would make backup and migration a much simpler task. > > Ok, I'm pretty sure that isn't in the immediate plan. But just let me > put my vote in. Alternatively, is there any alternative to having one > ever-growing mail db? Is there some trick with the db server that can > present one logical db from multiple db files? (I know a lot about > databases... but there's still a bunch I don't know). Has anyone else > faced/addressed this problem? Or is the answer to just live with it? > > Thanks. > > Jerry > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@james.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@james.apache.org
Multiple Databases?
I realize this is a completely off-the-wall question... but has there been any discussion about breaking the JAMES db into multiple databases? I have a bunch of clients, each with a bunch of accounts. And they all want to archive all of their mail and be able to access it through the same mail client. As the years go by, the db just keeps growing and growing. This became acutely obvious when I was recently forced by my server provider to migrate to newer hardware, and I realized I had to have mail down for a long time while I transferred a 60gB+ file across a slow connection to the new server. The db size is also making daily backups a problem. The reality is that 90% of the mail is archived into 'year' folders for each of the accounts which are basically "read-only" now. Only a relatively small amount of mail is truly in dynamically updated folders. If there was a way to store "/archives/2002" folders through "/archives/2017" folders in one db and all of the other folders in another db, it would make backup and migration a much simpler task. Ok, I'm pretty sure that isn't in the immediate plan. But just let me put my vote in. Alternatively, is there any alternative to having one ever-growing mail db? Is there some trick with the db server that can present one logical db from multiple db files? (I know a lot about databases... but there's still a bunch I don't know). Has anyone else faced/addressed this problem? Or is the answer to just live with it? Thanks. Jerry - To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@james.apache.org
Re: Redact IP addresses from Received field
Hi Benoit -- Thanks for your reply. I will take a look at the code and consider contributing this feature. Best, Rich On 5/7/2018 10:53 PM, Benoit Tellier wrote: > Hi Rich, > > Very unfortunately such a functionality do not exist today... > > However a new mailet can be contributed for this. I would propose: > > ``` > > host1.secret.com,host2.secret.com,145.12.15.168,145.12.15.169 > > ``` > > This can be implemented in mailet/standard project of this repository: > https://github.com/apache/james-project . An issue should also be > created in the Apache JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES > > Such a functionality seems quite generic and would allow to hide > internal mail infrastructure, thus it seems interesting. Such a > contribution will be highly appreciated. We can, of course, help you, > and provide guidance to implement such a mailet. > > Best regards, > > Benoit Tellier > > Le 07/05/2018 à 21:40, Rich P a écrit : >> In order to hide IP addresses for outbound mail, I configured James to >> remove the Received field using this in mailetcontainer.xml: >> >> >> >> Received >> >> >> This works but I think it's triggering SPAM filters for downstream >> recipients. Is there a simple way to leave the field intact but redact the >> IP addresses? >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@james.apache.org > > . > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@james.apache.org
