use of resource?
src/main/resource/META-INF/service/org/apache/servicemix/jbi/* src/main/resource/META-INF/service/org/apache/servicemix/jdbc/* use of these file in the directory? thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/use-of-resource--tf4810215s12049.html#a13762819 Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: WSIT Support
Thanks. Is there a technical reason why WSIT is not used in ServiceMix 3.2 instead? Freeman Fang-2 wrote: > > For servicemix cxf bc, we support ws-security, ws-ReliableMessage, > ws-policy, ws-Addressing, MTOM now > Regards > > Freeman > > ArmenH wrote: >> Yes, thank you for replying. Please confirm whether any of the WS-* >> specs >> below are not supported. We would need a true Enterprise solution for >> our >> financial systems. >> >> Thanks again for your kind attention. >> >> WS-Trust >> WS-Security >> WS-SecureConversation >> WS-Federation >> WS-ReliableMessaging >> WS-AtomicTransaction >> WS-Coordination >> WS-MetadataExchange >> WS-Policy >> WS-Addressing >> MTOM >> >> >> >> Freeman Fang-2 wrote: >> >>> From my understanding, I think the question is >>> >>> What's the CXF version used in servicemix? :-) >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Freeman >>> >>> >>> >>> Bozhong Lin wrote: >>> Just to clarify, I think CXF is used in ServiceMix version 3.2, not version 2.0.2. Regards, Bo On Nov 13, 2007 1:10 PM, Freeman Fang wrote: > Yes > > Freeman > > > ArmenH wrote: > > >> Thanks, >> >> Is the CXF used in ServiceMix version 2.0.2? >> >> >> Freeman Fang wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We already have servicemix-cxf-bc to leverage ws-* feature from cxf. >>> And I also know cxf team do lots of interoperability test between >>> cxf >>> and WCF(including ws-* feature), if you are interested in this >>> issue, >>> I >>> guess you could post this thread on cxf mailling list, where more >>> people >>> can answer your question. >>> >>> Best Regards >>> >>> Freeman >>> >>> ArmenH wrote: >>> >>> >>> It appears that CXF does support most of the WS-* Has anyone used Microsoft WCF based clients/services to show full interoperability? ArmenH wrote: > Does ServiceMix fully support WSIT? > > If not, are there plans to support it? > > CXF is still not fully compliant with WSIT. > > > > > >> >> >>> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/WSIT-Support-tf4795567s12049.html#a13762633 Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: WSIT Support
Yes, thank you for replying. Please confirm whether any of the WS-* specs below are not supported. We would need a true Enterprise solution for our financial systems. Thanks again for your kind attention. WS-Trust WS-Security WS-SecureConversation WS-Federation WS-ReliableMessaging WS-AtomicTransaction WS-Coordination WS-MetadataExchange WS-Policy WS-Addressing MTOM Freeman Fang-2 wrote: > > From my understanding, I think the question is > > What's the CXF version used in servicemix? :-) > > Regards > > Freeman > > > > Bozhong Lin wrote: >> Just to clarify, I think CXF is used in ServiceMix version 3.2, not >> version 2.0.2. >> >> Regards, >> Bo >> >> On Nov 13, 2007 1:10 PM, Freeman Fang wrote: >> >>> Yes >>> >>> Freeman >>> >>> >>> ArmenH wrote: >>> Thanks, Is the CXF used in ServiceMix version 2.0.2? Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi, > > We already have servicemix-cxf-bc to leverage ws-* feature from cxf. > And I also know cxf team do lots of interoperability test between cxf > and WCF(including ws-* feature), if you are interested in this issue, > I > guess you could post this thread on cxf mailling list, where more > people > can answer your question. > > Best Regards > > Freeman > > ArmenH wrote: > > >> It appears that CXF does support most of the WS-* >> >> Has anyone used Microsoft WCF based clients/services to show full >> interoperability? >> >> >> >> ArmenH wrote: >> >> >> >>> Does ServiceMix fully support WSIT? >>> >>> If not, are there plans to support it? >>> >>> CXF is still not fully compliant with WSIT. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/WSIT-Support-tf4795567s12049.html#a13761127 Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jira] Created: (SM-1138) Unwrapped XAResource objects used by JMS JCA consumer classes cause problems with Howl logging
Unwrapped XAResource objects used by JMS JCA consumer classes cause problems
with Howl logging
--
Key: SM-1138
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1138
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
Components: servicemix-jms
Affects Versions: 3.2
Reporter: Craig Muchinsky
The org.apache.servicemix.jms.endpoints.JmsJcaConsumerEndpoint and
org.apache.servicemix.jms.jca.JcaConsumerProcessor classes both leverage the
org.jencks.SingletonEndpointFactory class, however they are not setting the
name property, which leads to problems when using journaled JDBC persistence
backed by Howl. This manifests itself with the following errors when trying to
run the "basic" example with a Jencks connection factory:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot log transactions unles XAResources are
named! org.apache.activemq.ra.LocalAndXATransaction
A quick and dirty fix that worked for me was to add:
((SingletonEndpointFactory)endpointFactory).setName("");
immediately after the endpointFactory was created in the JmsJcaConsumerEndpoint
and JcaConsumerProcessor classes. I'm not sure if setting the name to a blank
string is valid, but it does seem to cause the SingletonEndpointFactory to wrap
the XAResource objects with a
org.apache.geronimo.transaction.manager.WrapperNamedXAResource. Another option
might be to modify the Jencks SingletonEndpointFactory class to always default
the name to "" internally, but I don't know if that would have negative side
effects anywhere else.
Related issues:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-622
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-778
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: build failed with 4.0 trunk code
This is because the JBI layer is tested against the 3.2.1-SNAPSHOT version of servicemix. I will upload a snapshot asap. In the meantime, you can checkout the 3.2branch and build it locally. On Nov 14, 2007 4:04 PM, Jeff Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All > > I've updated today's servicemix 4.0 branch code, and I ran "mvn clean > install -Dmaven.test.skip=true", I got below error.. > > Anyone else see this error? > > Missing: > -- > 1) > > org.apache.servicemix:servicemix-shared-compat:zip:installer:3.2.1-SNAPSHOT > > Try downloading the file manually from the project website. > > Then, install it using the command: > mvn install:install-file > -DgroupId=org.apache.servicemix-DartifactId=servicemix-shared-compat > \ > -Dversion=3.2.1-SNAPSHOT -Dclassifier=installer -Dpackaging=zip > -Dfile=/path/to/file > Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file > there: mvn deploy:deplo > y-file -DgroupId=org.apache.servicemix-DartifactId=servicemix-shared-compat > \ > -Dversion=3.2.1-SNAPSHOT -Dclassifier=installer -Dpackaging=zip > -Dfile=/path/to/file \ > -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id] > > Path to dependency: >1) > > org.apache.servicemix.jbi:org.apache.servicemix.jbi.itests:jar:4.0-SNAPSHOT >2) > > org.apache.servicemix:servicemix-shared-compat:zip:installer:3.2.1-SNAPSHOT > > 2) org.apache.servicemix:servicemix-eip:zip:installer:3.2.1-SNAPSHOT > > Try downloading the file manually from the project website. > > Then, install it using the command: > mvn install:install-file > -DgroupId=org.apache.servicemix-DartifactId=servicemix-eip \ > -Dversion=3.2.1-SNAPSHOT -Dclassifier=installer -Dpackaging=zip > -Dfile=/path/to/file > Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file > there: mvn deploy:deplo > y-file -DgroupId=org.apache.servicemix -DartifactId=servicemix-eip \ > -Dversion=3.2.1-SNAPSHOT -Dclassifier=installer -Dpackaging=zip > -Dfile=/path/to/file \ > -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id] > > Path to dependency: >1) > > org.apache.servicemix.jbi:org.apache.servicemix.jbi.itests:jar:4.0-SNAPSHOT >2) > org.apache.servicemix:servicemix-eip:zip:installer:3.2.1-SNAPSHOT > > -- > Best Regards > Jeff > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
build failed with 4.0 trunk code
Hi All I've updated today's servicemix 4.0 branch code, and I ran "mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true", I got below error.. Anyone else see this error? Missing: -- 1) org.apache.servicemix:servicemix-shared-compat:zip:installer:3.2.1-SNAPSHOT Try downloading the file manually from the project website. Then, install it using the command: mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.apache.servicemix-DartifactId=servicemix-shared-compat \ -Dversion=3.2.1-SNAPSHOT -Dclassifier=installer -Dpackaging=zip -Dfile=/path/to/file Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file there: mvn deploy:deplo y-file -DgroupId=org.apache.servicemix -DartifactId=servicemix-shared-compat \ -Dversion=3.2.1-SNAPSHOT -Dclassifier=installer -Dpackaging=zip -Dfile=/path/to/file \ -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id] Path to dependency: 1) org.apache.servicemix.jbi:org.apache.servicemix.jbi.itests:jar:4.0-SNAPSHOT 2) org.apache.servicemix:servicemix-shared-compat:zip:installer:3.2.1-SNAPSHOT 2) org.apache.servicemix:servicemix-eip:zip:installer:3.2.1-SNAPSHOT Try downloading the file manually from the project website. Then, install it using the command: mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.apache.servicemix-DartifactId=servicemix-eip \ -Dversion=3.2.1-SNAPSHOT -Dclassifier=installer -Dpackaging=zip -Dfile=/path/to/file Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file there: mvn deploy:deplo y-file -DgroupId=org.apache.servicemix -DartifactId=servicemix-eip \ -Dversion=3.2.1-SNAPSHOT -Dclassifier=installer -Dpackaging=zip -Dfile=/path/to/file \ -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id] Path to dependency: 1) org.apache.servicemix.jbi:org.apache.servicemix.jbi.itests:jar:4.0-SNAPSHOT 2) org.apache.servicemix:servicemix-eip:zip:installer:3.2.1-SNAPSHOT -- Best Regards Jeff
