RE: [jira] Doc reorg

2007-03-16 Thread Rossmanith, Philipp

Some propositions:
- Everything under DocumentationArchitecture should be moved to
Developers...
- In Developers, a division into information related to administration
(e.g. becoming a committer, ...) and coding (e.g. architecture) would be
appreciated
- Supplying the glossary with names of standards and links to their
implementations (e.g. WS-Notification)
- DevelopersTools and Tooling and Utilities is misleading
- One could divide the User documentation into parts which are related
to/required by the JBI standard (such as explanation of JBI, Ant tasks)
- servicemix-common might better be placed at a different location
- Tutorials and Guides should be joined
- User's guideServiceMix Components seems to be redundant with
Documentation...JBI Components
- Lightweight components could be placed under servicemix-lwcontainer to
emphasize their connection

Ciao,
Philipp

 -Mensaje original-
 De: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Enviado el: jueves, 15 de marzo de 2007 11:44
 Para: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
 Asunto: Re: [jira] Doc reorg

 Looks quite nice, congrats :-)
 I'm not very keen on changing the underlying engine,
 but the folding menu on the left seems quite usable.

 As Philip noted, it would be a nice and easy enhancement ...
 Is anyone willing to take a look at writing css /javascript
 to have a nice folding menu for ServiceMix ?

 On 3/15/07, kermitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  I would suggest to hav a look at what have done ivy , really great
  http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/write-doc.html
 
 
 
  gnodet wrote:
  
   I think we need to reorg the docs so that one can more easily
   find the informations (we also need to write more docs, but that's
   another problem).  Currently, the only way to really find a page
is
   to go to the site map and browse ...
  
   Any ideas on how to do that ?
  
   --
   Cheers,
   Guillaume Nodet
   
   Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
   Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
  
  
 
  --
  View this message in context:
  http://www.nabble.com/Doc-reorg-tf3269938s12049.html#a9491730
  Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 


 --
 Cheers,
 Guillaume Nodet
 
 Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
 Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorised
copying, use or distribution of this information is strictly prohibited.


Re: [jira] Doc reorg

2007-03-16 Thread Guillaume Nodet

Cool, thx :-)
I will try to take a close look.  Feel free to start if you want to do so.

Btw, I've seen you have added a new page, which is really great,
so I have added you as a contributor in the Team page.
Also, if you intend to work more on servicemix, you should
send a CLA (this should be mandatory to edit the wiki afaik).

On 3/16/07, Rossmanith, Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Some propositions:
- Everything under DocumentationArchitecture should be moved to
Developers...
- In Developers, a division into information related to administration
(e.g. becoming a committer, ...) and coding (e.g. architecture) would be
appreciated
- Supplying the glossary with names of standards and links to their
implementations (e.g. WS-Notification)
- DevelopersTools and Tooling and Utilities is misleading
- One could divide the User documentation into parts which are related
to/required by the JBI standard (such as explanation of JBI, Ant tasks)
- servicemix-common might better be placed at a different location
- Tutorials and Guides should be joined
- User's guideServiceMix Components seems to be redundant with
Documentation...JBI Components
- Lightweight components could be placed under servicemix-lwcontainer to
emphasize their connection

Ciao,
Philipp

 -Mensaje original-
 De: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Enviado el: jueves, 15 de marzo de 2007 11:44
 Para: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
 Asunto: Re: [jira] Doc reorg

 Looks quite nice, congrats :-)
 I'm not very keen on changing the underlying engine,
 but the folding menu on the left seems quite usable.

 As Philip noted, it would be a nice and easy enhancement ...
 Is anyone willing to take a look at writing css /javascript
 to have a nice folding menu for ServiceMix ?

 On 3/15/07, kermitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  I would suggest to hav a look at what have done ivy , really great
  http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/write-doc.html
 
 
 
  gnodet wrote:
  
   I think we need to reorg the docs so that one can more easily
   find the informations (we also need to write more docs, but that's
   another problem).  Currently, the only way to really find a page
is
   to go to the site map and browse ...
  
   Any ideas on how to do that ?
  
   --
   Cheers,
   Guillaume Nodet
   
   Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
   Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
  
  
 
  --
  View this message in context:
  http://www.nabble.com/Doc-reorg-tf3269938s12049.html#a9491730
  Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 


 --
 Cheers,
 Guillaume Nodet
 
 Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
 Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. Any
unauthorised
copying, use or distribution of this information is strictly prohibited.





--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/


Re: [jira] Doc reorg

2007-03-15 Thread Guillaume Nodet

Looks quite nice, congrats :-)
I'm not very keen on changing the underlying engine,
but the folding menu on the left seems quite usable.

As Philip noted, it would be a nice and easy enhancement ...
Is anyone willing to take a look at writing css /javascript
to have a nice folding menu for ServiceMix ?

On 3/15/07, kermitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



I would suggest to hav a look at what have done ivy , really great
http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/write-doc.html



gnodet wrote:

 I think we need to reorg the docs so that one can more easily
 find the informations (we also need to write more docs, but that's
 another problem).  Currently, the only way to really find a page is
 to go to the site map and browse ...

 Any ideas on how to do that ?

 --
 Cheers,
 Guillaume Nodet
 
 Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
 Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/



--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Doc-reorg-tf3269938s12049.html#a9491730
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.





--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/