Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.1.1 (2nd try)
+1 ! Guillaume Nodet wrote: I have uploaded a version of ServiceMix 3.1.1 in the standard repo for you to review. See http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/servicemix-311.html for the future download page and release notes (these are also included in the distribution). The distribution have been uploaded to http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/org/apache/servicemix/apache-servicemix/3.1.1-incubating/ I send this mail both to the dev list and [EMAIL PROTECTED], as a first vote has been conducted on the ServiceMix dev list and some issues have been fixed since that, so hopefully this one will be fine. [ ] +1 Release ServiceMix 3.1.1 [ ] +/- 0 [ ] -1 Do not release ServiceMix 3.1.1 The rat log is available at http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/rat-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.txthttp://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/rat-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.txt Here's my +1 Regards, Jevgeni Holodkov -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-ServiceMix-3.1.1-%282nd-try%29-tf3794624s12049.html#a11300604 Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.1.1 (2nd try)
I have fixed the LICENSE with the missing informations and redeployed a release to the same staging area. Hopefully we will find a better way to handle the license informations (I've seen some generated informations using maven) for the next major release and fix the generated license files somehow. Could everyone quickly review the changes ? I won't start a new vote as only the LICENSE file has changed, but I can if someone objects. robert burrell donkin wrote: On 5/29/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: On 5/28/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a friendly reminder. We're missing anoter IPMC vote ... issues --- i think that apache-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.tar.gz has some libraries in lib that are missing their LICENSE/NOTICE entries (eg howl, jencks) There are licensed under ASL 2.0 and don't have any NOTICE file afaik. cool Should all the jars be listed in the LICENSE / NOTICE file ? My assumption was that only those who had some attributions somehow or with a different license need to be, but correct me if I'm wrong. it is safe to release without listing them (and if this were the only issue then i would probably have voted affirmatively) but the aim should be to allow people to understand the licensing of releases without need to ask questions or do research. if i don't understand the licensing then i will ask. so, it's a good idea to note the licenses for all jars since it avoids the need to answer questions like this... snip otherwise generally ok but i have a few questions source in http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/org/apache/servicemix/samples/wsdl-first/wsdl-first-jsr181-su/3.1.1-incubating/ lacks headers. is this going to be released? if so, are these generated? are the jars under http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/ going to be released? servicemix-wsn2005-3.1.1-incubating-sources.jar contains lots of java sources without headers (mostly under org.apache.servicemix.wsn.jaxws). is this going to be released? if so, are these generated? Yeah, lots of these files are generated. Files generated are not in svn so we usually check the headers on the svn tree rather than the source jars generated by maven. These jars are not meant to be built for only contain all the java sources for debugging purposes. If you want to build these jars, you need to use the source distribution or use the svn tag. fine i hope to be a bit more prompt with the review next time - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.1.1 (2nd try)
Guillaume, Looks fine to me! We should definitely be able to create something to automate this kind of administrative tasks in the future... Gert Guillaume Nodet wrote: I have fixed the LICENSE with the missing informations and redeployed a release to the same staging area. Hopefully we will find a better way to handle the license informations (I've seen some generated informations using maven) for the next major release and fix the generated license files somehow. Could everyone quickly review the changes ? I won't start a new vote as only the LICENSE file has changed, but I can if someone objects. robert burrell donkin wrote: On 5/29/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: On 5/28/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a friendly reminder. We're missing anoter IPMC vote ... issues --- i think that apache-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.tar.gz has some libraries in lib that are missing their LICENSE/NOTICE entries (eg howl, jencks) There are licensed under ASL 2.0 and don't have any NOTICE file afaik. cool Should all the jars be listed in the LICENSE / NOTICE file ? My assumption was that only those who had some attributions somehow or with a different license need to be, but correct me if I'm wrong. it is safe to release without listing them (and if this were the only issue then i would probably have voted affirmatively) but the aim should be to allow people to understand the licensing of releases without need to ask questions or do research. if i don't understand the licensing then i will ask. so, it's a good idea to note the licenses for all jars since it avoids the need to answer questions like this... snip otherwise generally ok but i have a few questions source in http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/org/apache/servicemix/samples/wsdl-first/wsdl-first-jsr181-su/3.1.1-incubating/ lacks headers. is this going to be released? if so, are these generated? are the jars under http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/ going to be released? servicemix-wsn2005-3.1.1-incubating-sources.jar contains lots of java sources without headers (mostly under org.apache.servicemix.wsn.jaxws). is this going to be released? if so, are these generated? Yeah, lots of these files are generated. Files generated are not in svn so we usually check the headers on the svn tree rather than the source jars generated by maven. These jars are not meant to be built for only contain all the java sources for debugging purposes. If you want to build these jars, you need to use the source distribution or use the svn tag. fine i hope to be a bit more prompt with the review next time - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.1.1 (2nd try)
Yeah, and I'd like to ease the release process which is a real pain.
See http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/release-guide.html
Maven should be able to do all that in one command line but there
are some bugs and limitations unfortunately :-{
On 6/25/07, Gert Vanthienen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guillaume,
Looks fine to me! We should definitely be able to create something to
automate this kind of administrative tasks in the future...
Gert
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I have fixed the LICENSE with the missing informations
and redeployed a release to the same staging area.
Hopefully we will find a better way to handle the license informations
(I've seen some generated informations using maven) for the next major
release and fix the generated license files somehow.
Could everyone quickly review the changes ?
I won't start a new vote as only the LICENSE file has
changed, but I can if someone objects.
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 5/29/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 5/28/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a friendly reminder. We're missing anoter IPMC vote ...
issues
---
i think that apache-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.tar.gz has some
libraries in lib that are missing their LICENSE/NOTICE entries (eg
howl, jencks)
There are licensed under ASL 2.0 and don't have any NOTICE file afaik.
cool
Should all the jars be listed in the LICENSE / NOTICE file ? My
assumption
was that only those who had some attributions somehow or with a
different license
need to be, but correct me if I'm wrong.
it is safe to release without listing them (and if this were the only
issue then i would probably have voted affirmatively)
but the aim should be to allow people to understand the licensing of
releases without need to ask questions or do research. if i don't
understand the licensing then i will ask. so, it's a good idea to note
the licenses for all jars since it avoids the need to answer questions
like this...
snip
otherwise generally ok but i have a few questions
source in
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/org/apache/servicemix/samples/wsdl-first/wsdl-first-jsr181-su/3.1.1-incubating/
lacks headers. is this going to be released? if so, are these
generated?
are the jars under
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/ going
to
be released?
servicemix-wsn2005-3.1.1-incubating-sources.jar contains lots of java
sources without headers (mostly under
org.apache.servicemix.wsn.jaxws). is this going to be released? if
so,
are these generated?
Yeah, lots of these files are generated. Files generated are not in
svn
so we usually check the headers on the svn tree rather than the source
jars generated by maven. These jars are not meant to be built for
only
contain all the java sources for debugging purposes. If you want to
build these jars, you need to use the source distribution or use the
svn
tag.
fine
i hope to be a bit more prompt with the review next time
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Principal Engineer, IONA
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.1.1 (2nd try)
I have have some questions that need answering before we can proceed with the release. Please them inline below: On 5/29/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: On 5/28/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a friendly reminder. We're missing anoter IPMC vote ... issues --- i think that apache-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.tar.gz has some libraries in lib that are missing their LICENSE/NOTICE entries (eg howl, jencks) There are licensed under ASL 2.0 and don't have any NOTICE file afaik. Should all the jars be listed in the LICENSE / NOTICE file ? My assumption was that only those who had some attributions somehow or with a different license need to be, but correct me if I'm wrong. Can someone clarify this? How are Apache Licensed projects that are included in an ASF project supposed to be handled if they don't provide their own NOTICE file? apache-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating-src.zip contains a directory that seems like somethings gone wrong (src/C:tmp) I will fix that. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/servicemix-3.1.1/web/servicemix-web-console/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/sitemesh-decorator.tld is licensed under The OpenSymphony Software License, Version 1.1 - i can't see this in LICENSE or NOTICE. same goes to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/servicemix-3.1.1/web/servicemix-web-console/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/sitemesh-page.tld i think that https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/servicemix-3.1.1/web/servicemix-web-console/src/main/webapp/js/common.js requires attribution but i can't see anything in NOTICE i think that https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/servicemix-3.1.1/web/servicemix-web-console/src/main/webapp/js/css.js is missing from the LICENSE also https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/servicemix-3.1.1/web/servicemix-web-console/src/main/webapp/js/plotkit/*.js (after re-reading the latest version of http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html, i'm not sure how this applies javascript and other distributed source. i'll follow this up with legal.) I will add these informations to the LICENSE / NOTICE files. Is it sufficient to place these licenses in the NOTICE file? Can someone clarify this please? otherwise generally ok but i have a few questions source in http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/org/apache/servicemix/samples/wsdl-first/wsdl-first-jsr181-su/3.1.1-incubating/ lacks headers. is this going to be released? if so, are these generated? are the jars under http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/ going to be released? servicemix-wsn2005-3.1.1-incubating-sources.jar contains lots of java sources without headers (mostly under org.apache.servicemix.wsn.jaxws). is this going to be released? if so, are these generated? Yeah, lots of these files are generated. Files generated are not in svn so we usually check the headers on the svn tree rather than the source jars generated by maven. These jars are not meant to be built for only contain all the java sources for debugging purposes. If you want to build these jars, you need to use the source distribution or use the svn tag. So do we need to license generated files? Thanks for the assistance. Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]5R\F)R=6-E+G-N61ED\!G;6%I;\YC;VT* );' Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/ Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/ Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/ Castor - http://castor.org/
Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.1.1 (2nd try)
Just a friendly reminder. We're missing anoter IPMC vote ... On 5/22/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have uploaded a version of ServiceMix 3.1.1 in the standard repo for you to review. See http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/servicemix-311.html for the future download page and release notes (these are also included in the distribution). The distribution have been uploaded to http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/org/apache/servicemix/apache-servicemix/3.1.1-incubating/http://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/org/apache/servicemix/apache-servicemix/3.1.1-incubating/ I send this mail both to the dev list and [EMAIL PROTECTED], as a first vote has been conducted on the ServiceMix dev list and some issues have been fixed since that, so hopefully this one will be fine. [ ] +1 Release ServiceMix 3.1.1 [ ] +/- 0 [ ] -1 Do not release ServiceMix 3.1.1 The rat log is available at http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/rat-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.txt http://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/rat-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.txt Here's my +1 -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Principal Engineer, IONA Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Principal Engineer, IONA Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.1.1 (2nd try)
+1 looks good to me On 5/22/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have uploaded a version of ServiceMix 3.1.1 in the standard repo for you to review. See http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/servicemix-311.html for the future download page and release notes (these are also included in the distribution). The distribution have been uploaded to http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/org/apache/servicemix/apache-servicemix/3.1.1-incubating/ I send this mail both to the dev list and [EMAIL PROTECTED], as a first vote has been conducted on the ServiceMix dev list and some issues have been fixed since that, so hopefully this one will be fine. [ ] +1 Release ServiceMix 3.1.1 [ ] +/- 0 [ ] -1 Do not release ServiceMix 3.1.1 The rat log is available at http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/rat-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.txthttp://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/rat-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.txt Here's my +1 -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Principal Engineer, IONA Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ -- James --- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.1.1 (2nd try)
+1 from me. thanks, dims On 5/22/07, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 looks good to me On 5/22/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have uploaded a version of ServiceMix 3.1.1 in the standard repo for you to review. See http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/servicemix-311.html for the future download page and release notes (these are also included in the distribution). The distribution have been uploaded to http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/org/apache/servicemix/apache-servicemix/3.1.1-incubating/ I send this mail both to the dev list and [EMAIL PROTECTED], as a first vote has been conducted on the ServiceMix dev list and some issues have been fixed since that, so hopefully this one will be fine. [ ] +1 Release ServiceMix 3.1.1 [ ] +/- 0 [ ] -1 Do not release ServiceMix 3.1.1 The rat log is available at http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/rat-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.txthttp://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/rat-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.txt Here's my +1 -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Principal Engineer, IONA Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ -- James --- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.1.1 (2nd try)
+1 from me. This build looks much better than the earlier builds. Dan On Tuesday 22 May 2007 03:03, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I have uploaded a version of ServiceMix 3.1.1 in the standard repo for you to review. See http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/servicemix-311.html for the future download page and release notes (these are also included in the distribution). The distribution have been uploaded to http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/org/apach e/servicemix/apache-servicemix/3.1.1-incubating/ I send this mail both to the dev list and [EMAIL PROTECTED], as a first vote has been conducted on the ServiceMix dev list and some issues have been fixed since that, so hopefully this one will be fine. [ ] +1 Release ServiceMix 3.1.1 [ ] +/- 0 [ ] -1 Do not release ServiceMix 3.1.1 The rat log is available at http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/rat-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.txth ttp://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/rat-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.txt Here's my +1 -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer IONA P: 781-902-8727C: 508-380-7194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
