Re: [sidr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7132 (4454)

2015-08-25 Thread Stephen Kent

yes, I concur as well.

Steve


This seems correct to me (the proposed change I mean)

At Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:45:52 -0700 (PDT),
RFC Errata System wrote:

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7132,
"Threat Model for BGP Path Security".

--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7132&eid=4454

--
Type: Editorial
Reported by: David Mandelberg 

Section: 1

Original Text
-
PATHSEC is intended to address the concerns cited above, to provide
significantly improved path security, which builds upon the route
origination validation capability offered by use of the RPKI
[RFC6810].

Corrected Text
--
PATHSEC is intended to address the concerns cited above, to provide
significantly improved path security, which builds upon the route
origination validation capability offered by use of the RPKI
[RFC6811].

Notes
-
I think this text should reference RFC6811 (origin validation), not RFC6810 
(the rpki-rtr protocol).

Instructions:
-
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--
RFC7132 (draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-09)
--
Title   : Threat Model for BGP Path Security
Publication Date: February 2014
Author(s)   : S. Kent, A. Chi
Category: INFORMATIONAL
Source  : Secure Inter-Domain Routing
Area: Routing
Stream  : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG


___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr


Re: [sidr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7132 (4454)

2015-08-25 Thread Randy Bush
> I think this text should reference RFC6811 (origin validation), not
> RFC6810 (the rpki-rtr protocol).

sigh.  the erratum is correct.

randy

___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr


Re: [sidr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7132 (4454)

2015-08-25 Thread Chris Morrow

This seems correct to me (the proposed change I mean)

At Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:45:52 -0700 (PDT),
RFC Errata System wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7132,
> "Threat Model for BGP Path Security".
> 
> --
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7132&eid=4454
> 
> --
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: David Mandelberg 
> 
> Section: 1
> 
> Original Text
> -
>PATHSEC is intended to address the concerns cited above, to provide
>significantly improved path security, which builds upon the route
>origination validation capability offered by use of the RPKI
>[RFC6810].
> 
> Corrected Text
> --
>PATHSEC is intended to address the concerns cited above, to provide
>significantly improved path security, which builds upon the route
>origination validation capability offered by use of the RPKI
>[RFC6811].
> 
> Notes
> -
> I think this text should reference RFC6811 (origin validation), not RFC6810 
> (the rpki-rtr protocol).
> 
> Instructions:
> -
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --
> RFC7132 (draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-09)
> --
> Title   : Threat Model for BGP Path Security
> Publication Date: February 2014
> Author(s)   : S. Kent, A. Chi
> Category: INFORMATIONAL
> Source  : Secure Inter-Domain Routing
> Area: Routing
> Stream  : IETF
> Verifying Party : IESG

___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr


[sidr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7132 (4454)

2015-08-25 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7132,
"Threat Model for BGP Path Security".

--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7132&eid=4454

--
Type: Editorial
Reported by: David Mandelberg 

Section: 1

Original Text
-
   PATHSEC is intended to address the concerns cited above, to provide
   significantly improved path security, which builds upon the route
   origination validation capability offered by use of the RPKI
   [RFC6810].

Corrected Text
--
   PATHSEC is intended to address the concerns cited above, to provide
   significantly improved path security, which builds upon the route
   origination validation capability offered by use of the RPKI
   [RFC6811].

Notes
-
I think this text should reference RFC6811 (origin validation), not RFC6810 
(the rpki-rtr protocol).

Instructions:
-
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--
RFC7132 (draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-09)
--
Title   : Threat Model for BGP Path Security
Publication Date: February 2014
Author(s)   : S. Kent, A. Chi
Category: INFORMATIONAL
Source  : Secure Inter-Domain Routing
Area: Routing
Stream  : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG

___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr