[SIESTA-L] Siesta for mac

2008-06-09 Thread antonio aliano
good day,
I'm trying to use siesta on mac, but i'm meeting some difficulties in
compiling Siesta on mac...
I downloaded gfortran and g77 compiler but Siesta cannot create the
executive file probably becuase it is missing g95 or f95 compiler for mac,
but i found some difficuties in downloading them or compiling.
Can anyone , please tell me some suggestion about this...

Thank you

Regards

A.A.


Re: [SIESTA-L] Siesta for mac

2008-06-09 Thread Lucas Wagner
Here's an arch.make that worked for me.  It's sequential only, though.

Cheers,

Lucas

On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:31 PM, antonio aliano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> good day,
> I'm trying to use siesta on mac, but i'm meeting some difficulties in
> compiling Siesta on mac...
> I downloaded gfortran and g77 compiler but Siesta cannot create the
> executive file probably becuase it is missing g95 or f95 compiler for mac,
> but i found some difficuties in downloading them or compiling.
> Can anyone , please tell me some suggestion about this...
> Thank you
> Regards
> A.A.


arch.make
Description: Binary data


Re: [SIESTA-L] Making siesta work with fractional electrons invalence orbitals

2008-06-09 Thread Edan Scriven
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 13:59 -0600, M Bharat Kumar wrote:
> Hi Siesta users,
> 
> I need help in making siesta work with fractional electrons in valence
> orbitals. I am attaching input for atom program and input & output of
> siesta. I was not able to understand the warning messages in siesta
> output.
> Any help is appreciated and thanks in advance.
> 
> Bharat


I'm not sure what you mean by fractional electrons ... do you mean you
want to set NetCharge in your system to some non-integer (which is
totally allowed and I do it all the time), or some kind of excited
charge-neutral state with a fraction of an electron excited? Anyway, I
made a different pseudopotential and your input .fdf worked, so the
problem is most likely in your pseudo definition. Here's what I tried:

   pe  Gold
tm2  4.0
 n=Au c=pbr
   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
   124
60  1.00  0.00
61  0.00  0.00
52 10.00  0.00
53  0.00  0.00
  2.00  2.50  1.00  2.00  1.00  1.40

#23456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890

I changed: 
* c=pbr (was c=pb, you probably want relativistic corrections enabled
for gold).
* Changed the population of the valence orbitals (you might not need to
mess around with exciting the pseudopotential populations to get a
decent excited state calculation, your mileage may vary and I've never
calculated gold before, let alone in bizarre charge states).
* Messed around with the r_c values. Your pseudofunctions were
overshooting the all-electron charge density peaks. ATOM produces .gps
files which you can feed into gnuplot to get .ps files with pretty
graphs showing how well each L channel in your pseudo corresponds to
their all-electron analogs. I picked new r_c values from these graphs.

Any combination of these changes may be what you need to make your
calculation work, so good luck with that.

Edan.