Re: [SIESTA-L] parallel calculation with GGA method

2007-06-04 Thread Eduardo Anglada

Dear Helean,
Try to increase the meshcutoff to something more reasonable: 100-150 Ry
Regards,
Eduardo

On 02/06/2007, at 10:47, Mu J. Helien wrote:


Dear Siesta users,
I compiled the parallel version of siesta code sucessfully, but it  
seems that it can't run normally with GGA method.
For the pseudopotential was generated by means of GGA-PBE method, I  
defined XC.functional   GGA and XC.authors  PBE in the .fdf  
file. But it can't work and the following is the error information  
in the output file:

InitMesh: MESH =30 x24 x24 =   17280
InitMesh: Mesh cutoff (required, used) =10.00012.406 Ry
rank 1 in job 51  mitp4.emsl.pnl.gov_58106   caused collective  
abort of all ranks

 exit status of rank 1: killed by signal 9
However, if I delete the above definitions, then the job can run  
normally.
It seems that there is something wrong with the parallel  
calculation with GGA method.
I wonder if someone has ever met such problem and can give me some  
suggestions on how to solve such problem.

Thank you very much.

Helean






[SIESTA-L] parallel calculation with GGA method

2007-06-02 Thread Mu J. Helien

Dear Siesta users,
I compiled the parallel version of siesta code sucessfully, but it 
seems that it can't run normally with GGA method.
For the pseudopotential was generated by means of GGA-PBE method, I 
defined XC.functional   GGA and XC.authors  PBE in the .fdf file. 
But it can't work and the following is the error information in the 
output file:

InitMesh: MESH =30 x24 x24 =   17280
InitMesh: Mesh cutoff (required, used) =10.00012.406 Ry
rank 1 in job 51  mitp4.emsl.pnl.gov_58106   caused collective abort of 
all ranks

 exit status of rank 1: killed by signal 9
However, if I delete the above definitions, then the job can run normally.
It seems that there is something wrong with the parallel calculation 
with GGA method.
I wonder if someone has ever met such problem and can give me some 
suggestions on how to solve such problem.

Thank you very much.

Helean