Re: [Sikuli-driver] [Question #254856]: sikuli-java 1.0.1 - The timeout used by exists method
Question #254856 on Sikuli changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/254856 Pathiyil posted a new comment: Ran a few tests. The machine has dual core 2.53 GHz processors and 12GB RAM. The screens are 1920 X 1080. Each test was run a total of 4 times, twice on each screen. In all the tests, the image being searched for was not present in the screen. The time was captured using java Date objects. The numbers given are for each run. With an image of size 47 X 47 pixels - 3666 msecs 1253 msecs 1113 msecs 1061 msecs With an image of size 575 X 506 pixels - 2554 msecs 1883 msecs 1626 msecs 1651 msecs With an image of size 1920 X 1080 pixels - 7215 msecs 6273 msecs 6107 msecs 6180 msecs Just out of curiosity, replaced exists with a find having try/catch around it. With an image of size 47 X 47 pixels - 3401 msecs 3270 msecs 3313 msecs 3303 msecs -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Sikuli Drivers, which is an answer contact for Sikuli. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver Post to : sikuli-driver@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Sikuli-driver] [Question #254856]: [1.0.1] getting some seconds of find time with exists(img, 0) in cases where the image is not visible
Question #254856 on Sikuli changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/254856 Summary changed to: [1.0.1] getting some seconds of find time with exists(img,0) in cases where the image is not visible -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Sikuli Drivers, which is an answer contact for Sikuli. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver Post to : sikuli-driver@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Sikuli-driver] [Question #254856]: sikuli-java 1.0.1 - The timeout used by exists method
Question #254856 on Sikuli changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/254856 Status: Open = Answered RaiMan proposed the following answer: ok, that are the values, we have to live with currently (up to version 1.1.0) in case of exists-not-found. On my Win8-64 i7/3.4 (1920x1200) I get similar values with version 1.1 In version 1.2 I will add some optimization by dispatching chunks of search into different threads, to better use multicore systems. In 1.1.0 I have added find profiling, that internally stores the elapsed times of the find ops with the Match and the search Region: someMatch.getTime() someRegion.getLastTime() both return as long the duration in msecs of the last find op. So this might make it a bit easier, if you are only interested in the elapsed time consumed by a find op Be aware: your last example: if not found, this is always the given wait time (usually slightly larger) (except exists(img,0), since this always returns after the first trial) -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Sikuli Drivers, which is an answer contact for Sikuli. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver Post to : sikuli-driver@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Sikuli-driver] [Question #254856]: [1.0.1] exists(img, 0): getting some seconds of find time in cases where a larger image is not visible
Question #254856 on Sikuli changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/254856 Description changed to: see comment #9 for some explanation - I am using sikuli-java 1.0.1 with JDK 1.7 on a Win7 box. When I am calling screen.exists(imageName), it seems to be coming back only after about 5 seconds. Tried making it exists(imageName, 0), but that didn't make it return any faster. The same was the case with any value between 0 - 5. For all of these the autoWaitTimeout was the default value of 3. Tried calling screen.exists(imageName) after calling screen.setAutoWaitTimeout(0.1), but that didn't help either. When I pass values of more than 5 for the seconds parameter (say 15), then it seemed to take that much of time. Is this behavior expected ? Thanks. -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Sikuli Drivers, which is an answer contact for Sikuli. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver Post to : sikuli-driver@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Sikuli-driver] [Question #254856]: [1.0.1] exists(img, 0): getting some seconds of find time in cases where a larger image is not visible
Question #254856 on Sikuli changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/254856 Summary changed to: [1.0.1] exists(img,0): getting some seconds of find time in cases where a larger image is not visible -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Sikuli Drivers, which is an answer contact for Sikuli. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver Post to : sikuli-driver@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Sikuli-driver] [Question #254856]: [1.0.1] exists(img, 0): getting some seconds of find time in cases where a larger image is not visible
Question #254856 on Sikuli changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/254856 RaiMan proposed the following answer: BTW: this is my test script (version 1.1.0): # some base image to start with base = find(1411456264567.png) #create a small image m = base.getCenter().grow(50) small = Pattern(capture(m)).exact() # create a medium image m1 = grow(m.getTopLeft(), 0, 0, 570, 500) medium = Pattern(capture(m1)).exact() #create the large image m2 = Region(SCREEN) large = Pattern(capture(m2)).exact() # hide the stuff if Settings.isWindows(): switchApp(SourceTree) else: switchApp(Finder) wait(1) # try to find for i in range(2): exists(small, 0) print small:, getLastTime() print m for i in range(2): exists(medium, 0) print medium:, getLastTime() print m1 for i in range(2): exists(large, 0) print large:, getLastTime() print m2 … and I get this on my good old MacPro (Xeon 2,66 16GB) small: 2223 small: 2180 R[40,39 50x50]@S(0)[0,0 1920x1200] E:Y, T:3,0 medium: 3318 medium: 3297 R[40,39 570x500]@S(0)[0,0 1920x1200] E:Y, T:3,0 large: 14796 large: 14856 R[0,0 1920x1200]@S(0)[0,0 1920x1200] E:Y, T:3,0 … so be happy with you machine ;-) -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Sikuli Drivers, which is an answer contact for Sikuli. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver Post to : sikuli-driver@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Sikuli-driver] [Question #254856]: [1.0.1] exists(img, 0): getting some seconds of find time in cases where a larger image is not visible
Question #254856 on Sikuli changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/254856 Status: Answered = Solved Pathiyil confirmed that the question is solved: Thanks for reviewing this and confirming the numbers. My use case was to wait for the appearance of an image across all the available screens till some max wait time. exists taking more than a second threw my calculations off as far as number of iterations (using the timeout between the checks as 1 / Settings.ObservedScanRate) Altered my implementation to keep track of total elapsed time with a more hard coded sleep time in between checks now. -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Sikuli Drivers, which is an answer contact for Sikuli. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver Post to : sikuli-driver@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Sikuli-driver] [Question #254915]: Unable to type URL because of shifting problem
New question #254915 on Sikuli: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/254915 Hello, I am trying to have Sikuli type a URL into a form, but have a problem because the shift key is not being activated. In Sikuli: type(http://google.com;) I want http://google.com to be inserted into the form. Instead, it is typing http;//google.com I have tried several things including breaking the URL into pieces, saying first type(http) then adding either type(;, KeyModifier.SHIFT) type(;, Key.SHIFT) Unfortunately none of these are working. Any help/suggestions would be appreciated -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Sikuli Drivers, which is an answer contact for Sikuli. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver Post to : sikuli-driver@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Sikuli-driver] [Question #254918]: Running more than 10 scripts sequentially is failing.
New question #254918 on Sikuli: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/254918 Running more than 10 scripts sequentially is failing. I have a main script to run 36 scripts sequentially. Sikuli always fail when arrives to the lines 9 or 10. If I run the scripts by separate do not fail. -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Sikuli Drivers, which is an answer contact for Sikuli. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver Post to : sikuli-driver@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Sikuli-driver] [Question #254915]: Unable to type URL because of shifting problem
Question #254915 on Sikuli changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/254915 Status: Open = Answered RaiMan proposed the following answer: see faq 933 use paste() instead -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Sikuli Drivers, which is an answer contact for Sikuli. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver Post to : sikuli-driver@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Sikuli-driver] [Question #254918]: Running more than 10 scripts sequentially is failing.
Question #254918 on Sikuli changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/254918 Status: Open = Needs information RaiMan requested more information: what version of Sikuli? what system? how do you run the scripts? what errors do you get? what are the symptoms? -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Sikuli Drivers, which is an answer contact for Sikuli. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver Post to : sikuli-driver@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
