Re: [silk] curious about whether this is a reasonable article...

2009-09-25 Thread Indrajit Gupta


--- On Fri, 25/9/09, Luqmaan lukhman_k...@yahoo.com wrote:

 From: Luqmaan lukhman_k...@yahoo.com
 Subject: Re: [silk] curious about whether this is a reasonable article...
 To: silklist@lists.hserus.net
 Date: Friday, 25 September, 2009, 9:02 AM
  The version I know is that the
 Hindutvabadis think
  everything originated in India and percolated
 outwards;
 
 Do they also claim that the earths axis passes through
 hindustan?
 
  To bear out this story, very many weird stories
  have been invented.
  Was this proposed by Kiran K?
  I would take any theories promoted by Kiran very
  judiciously indeed; he tends to leap before he looks.
 
 You have this tendency to grossly understate.
 
 Lukhman.


I know; I was just being excruciatingly polite. What I think of his posts (not 
of him, his messages only) won't bear reproduction on a forum such as this.






Re: [silk] curious about whether this is a reasonable article...

2009-09-25 Thread Biju Chacko
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Indrajit Gupta bonoba...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
  Was this proposed by Kiran K?
  I would take any theories promoted by Kiran very
  judiciously indeed; he tends to leap before he looks.

 You have this tendency to grossly understate.

 Lukhman.


 I know; I was just being excruciatingly polite. What I think of his posts 
 (not of him, his messages only) won't bear reproduction on a forum such as 
 this.

Can we avoid the gratuitous name calling?

-- b



Re: [silk] curious about whether this is a reasonable article...

2009-09-25 Thread Bharat Shetty
I second Biju, I believe lots of us have better things to do than
calling names, or carrying out ad hominem personal attacks targeted at
a single person.

-- Bharat

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Biju Chacko biju.cha...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Indrajit Gupta bonoba...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
  Was this proposed by Kiran K?
  I would take any theories promoted by Kiran very
  judiciously indeed; he tends to leap before he looks.

 You have this tendency to grossly understate.

 Lukhman.


 I know; I was just being excruciatingly polite. What I think of his posts 
 (not of him, his messages only) won't bear reproduction on a forum such as 
 this.

 Can we avoid the gratuitous name calling?

 -- b





[silk] Manchurian

2009-09-25 Thread Deepak Misra
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Madhu Menon c...@shiokfood.com wrote:


 Er, yes, something like that. Mentioning gobi manchurian near me is
 asking to get stabbed with one of my knives. ;)

 (Actually, I thought my sig would give it away.)


 Madhu




Then you would love
http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/jugglebandhi/entry/chinese-chakkars

Deepak


Re: [silk] Manchurian

2009-09-25 Thread Thaths
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Deepak Misra
yahoogro...@deepakmisra.com wrote:
 Then you would love
 http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/jugglebandhi/entry/chinese-chakkars

To begin with, 'chow mein' (not to mention 'fried rice') does not
exist anywhere in China, either in their kitchens or in their
lexicons. To append the adjective 'Chinese' (or 'Chinees') to this
unholy mess is insulting enough.

Actually, Suraiya is wrong on at least this front.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chow_mein

Chow mein (chao mian in Mandarin-speaking communities) is a generic
Chinese term for a dish of stir-fried noodles, of which there are many
varieties.

Thaths
-- 
Homer: Look at these low, low prices on famous brand-name electronics!
Bart:  Don't be a sap, Dad. These are just crappy knockoffs.
Homer: Pfft. I know a genuine Panaphonics when I see it. And look, there's
   a Magnetbox and Sorny.



Re: [silk] Manchurian

2009-09-25 Thread divya manian
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Thaths tha...@gmail.com wrote:
 Actually, Suraiya is wrong on at least this front.

Probably comes from being computer-illiterate and being proud of it
http://www.timesnow.tv/Debate-Whats-the-big-deal-about-Tharoors-tweet/videoshow/4327575.cms

- divya



Re: [silk] Manchurian

2009-09-25 Thread Srini RamaKrishnan
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:15 PM, divya manian divya.man...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Thaths tha...@gmail.com wrote:
 Actually, Suraiya is wrong on at least this front.

 Probably comes from being computer-illiterate and being proud of it
 http://www.timesnow.tv/Debate-Whats-the-big-deal-about-Tharoors-tweet/videoshow/4327575.cms

That was agonizingly stupid, all 4 of them. Thank heavens I don't watch TV.

Cheeni



Re: [silk] Manchurian

2009-09-25 Thread Srini RamaKrishnan
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Amit Varma amitbl...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
 http://www.timesnow.tv/Debate-Whats-the-big-deal-about-Tharoors-tweet/videoshow/4327575.cms

 That was agonizingly stupid, all 4 of them. Thank heavens I don't watch TV.


 All 4 of them? :)

True, only 3 of them spoke in the first few minutes that I was able to
watch, the fourth hadn't uttered a word till then, you weren't the
fourth were you?

Cheeni



Re: [silk] Manchurian

2009-09-25 Thread Lahar Appaiah
Well, to be fair, you smirked when you heard that Tweet was a very lonely
man. I found that quite insensitive to Mr. Tweet. I'm not sure if you had
even done the same amount of research Mr. Vadakkan had, or had any idea
about the pain this Tweet person was going through, but you were being quite
high handed there.


On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Amit Varma amitbl...@gmail.com wrote:

  That was agonizingly stupid, all 4 of them. Thank heavens I don't watch
 TV.
 

 All 4 of them? :)



Re: [silk] Manchurian

2009-09-25 Thread Amit Varma
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Srini RamaKrishnan che...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Amit Varma amitbl...@gmail.com wrote:
 [...]
 
 http://www.timesnow.tv/Debate-Whats-the-big-deal-about-Tharoors-tweet/videoshow/4327575.cms
 
  That was agonizingly stupid, all 4 of them. Thank heavens I don't watch
 TV.
 
 
  All 4 of them? :)

 True, only 3 of them spoke in the first few minutes that I was able to
 watch, the fourth hadn't uttered a word till then, you weren't the
 fourth were you?


Heh, well, I did get a few words in much later. Wrote about the show here:
http://indiauncut.com/iublog/article/tweet-is-a-very-lonely-man/

I don't watch TV either, as it happens.



-- 
Amit Varma
http://www.indiauncut.com
http://www.twitter.com/amitvarma


Re: [silk] Manchurian

2009-09-25 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Tharoor's got a long career as a senior UN bureaucrat, even making deputy 
secretary general as kofi annan's protege.  Then ran against ban ki moon, lost 
and left

That career would be two or three decades worth of effort, and certainly 
teaches people to be diplomatic and careful in what they say.  Celebrity author 
status + a mistaken idea that all the twitterati are a lot more flippant than 
your average bureaucrat didn't help

He complains of ridiculously high workloads after his africa trip.. on what's 
probably the biggest time sink online

Way to go, I'd say

--Original Message--
From: Lahar Appaiah
Sender: silklist-bounces+suresh=hserus@lists.hserus.net
To: silklist@lists.hserus.net
ReplyTo: silklist@lists.hserus.net
Subject: Re: [silk] Manchurian
Sent: Sep 25, 2009 23:10

Well, to be fair, you smirked when you heard that Tweet was a very lonely
man. I found that quite insensitive to Mr. Tweet. I'm not sure if you had
even done the same amount of research Mr. Vadakkan had, or had any idea
about the pain this Tweet person was going through, but you were being quite
high handed there.


On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Amit Varma amitbl...@gmail.com wrote:

  That was agonizingly stupid, all 4 of them. Thank heavens I don't watch
 TV.
 

 All 4 of them? :)



-- 
srs (blackberry)

Re: [silk] Manchurian

2009-09-25 Thread ss
On Friday 25 Sep 2009 10:27:15 pm Thaths wrote:
 chao mian

Chao mian (Also called Chou En Lai) was also one of the early players in the 
game that led via Pakistan to an anti Soviet alliance between the US and 
China - with Pakistan being paid off with a tested design of a nuclear bomb 
and enough Uranium to make over a dozen bombs while the mealy mouthed non 
proliferation lobby looked the other way.

shiv



[silk] Test

2009-09-25 Thread ss
Sorry folks - gmail has reset my POP3 checking ability without my permission 
and I am just checkin..

This isn't the first time this has happened

shiv

PS

My Standard Chartered Bank account number is 456598002
My login name is google
My password is google123

Just want to store this info on the Google server