Re: [silk] Flaming Out

2006-12-09 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 10:15:39AM +0530, Udhay Shankar N wrote:

> Yeah, we can hear you. In your case, it seems to have been your PGP 
> signature, as I had set the list to reject attachments. Can you try 
> again? It should work now, even with your signature.

It's easy enough to whitelist particular MIME types in Mailman.
Let's see whether this is working...

-- 
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: [silk] Flaming Out

2006-12-08 Thread Udhay Shankar N

Eugen Leitl wrote: [ on 09:48 PM 12/8/2006 ]


Is this thing on? This message not signed...


(the subject line still seems appropriate :-)

Yeah, we can hear you. In your case, it seems to have been your PGP 
signature, as I had set the list to reject attachments. Can you try 
again? It should work now, even with your signature.


Udhay

--
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))




Re: [silk] Flaming Out

2006-12-08 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 07:36:48AM -0800, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Udhay Shankar N [08/12/06 12:15 +0530]:
> >Via Eugen, a nice piece on a topic we discuss every so often.
> >
> 
> I'm seeing regular email delivery of silk email to eugen
> Could he check his mail queue to see what he's getting?
> If he's sending email out of a dynamic IP I might reject it - but he'd then
> get a smtp 550 reject / bounce in his mail logs

Is this thing on? This message not signed...

-- 
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE



[silk] Flaming Out

2006-12-07 Thread Udhay Shankar N

Via Eugen, a nice piece on a topic we discuss every so often.

Udhay

http://www.nymag.com/news/features/24757

Can’t Get No Satisfaction
In a culture where work can be a religion, burnout is its crisis of faith.

* By Jennifer Senior

People who are suffering from burnout tend to 
describe the sensation in metaphors of 
emptiness—they’re a dry teapot over a high flame, 
a drained battery that can no longer hold its 
charge. Thirteen years, three books, and dozens 
of papers into his profession, Barry Farber, a 
professor at Columbia Teachers College and 
trained psychotherapist, realized he was feeling 
this way. Unfortunately, he was well acquainted 
with the symptoms. He was a burnout researcher himself.


Being burned out on burnout—now that was rich. 
Madame Curie died of radiation poisoning; Joseph 
Mitchell famously developed a 32-year-long case 
of writer’s block after writing a two-part New 
Yorker series about a blocked writer; now Farber 
was suffering the same self-referential fate. He 
jokes about it today (who wouldn’t?) but hardly 
felt sanguine as it was happening (who would?). 
Colleagues tried to persuade him to stick it out. 
“But for the most part, I’ve resisted coming 
back,” says Farber. “I’ve never been able to find 
that same sense of satisfaction.”


Farber had burned out once before. Back in the 
late sixties and early seventies, he taught 
public school in East Harlem. He’d wanted to help 
people, do the world some good. Yet for four 
years he’d struggled to stop his students from 
fighting with one another, and in spite of his 
best efforts he couldn’t even teach all of them 
to read. His classroom became a perverse 
experiment in physics, with energy never 
conserved (input always exceeded output), and he, 
a teacher in perpetual motion, always craving 
rest. Eventually, he began to pull away from his 
students—depersonalization, as the literature now 
calls it—justifying his seeming insensitivity by 
telling himself he wasn’t making a difference 
anyway. It was only when Farber went to graduate 
school at Yale that he learned that this syndrome 
had a name: Burnout. “The concept offered a 
perfect understanding of what teachers were 
feeling,” he recalls. “It wasn’t in fact that 
they were racist and mercenary and noncaring but 
that their level of caring couldn’t be sustained in the absence of results.”


Farber was so captivated by the notion of burnout 
he made it the subject of his dissertation. And 
he stayed with it for another thirteen years. 
Until the day he couldn’t anymore. He still 
remembers the breaking point. He’d just completed 
a book about burnout among teachers, a subject 
he’d once considered exceptionally urgent. “Yet 
even as I was writing,” he says, “I had this 
sense that I really wanted to finish it so that I 
could go on to something else. I felt somewhat 
bored, and somewhat depleted. I’d said all I 
wanted to say.” He ponders this point. “I guess,” 
he says, “I lost the sense that it was important.”


I can’t quite say that I’ve ever had the full-on 
Farber experience. But I’ve certainly had 
mini-versions of it. Whenever I’ve finished a big 
project, for instance, or whenever I’ve found 
myself listening to the 10 p.m. whir of the 
vacuum cleaners in our office start up for the 
tenth night in a row, there’s no one I identify 
with more than the Bill Murray character in 
Rushmore, particularly as he’s blankly tossing 
golf balls from a wire basket into his swimming 
pool. It’s not that I don’t love my work. But 
hold a stethoscope to my brain, eavesdrop on my 
innermost thoughts, and at those moments, all 
you’ll hear is the sound of a whistling conch shell.


Burnout is not its own category in the Diagnostic 
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. It’s 
not something that can be treated 
pharmacologically; it is not considered the same 
thing as depression or a midlife crisis, though 
sometimes they coincide. The term was first 
coined by a psychotherapist named Herbert 
Freudenberger, who himself probably took it from 
Graham Greene’s novel A Burnt-Out Case. (“I 
haven’t enough feeling left for human beings,” 
the book’s numb protagonist, Querry, wrote in his 
journal, “to do anything for them out of pity.”) 
While working at a free clinic for drug addicts 
in Haight-Ashbury, Freudenberger noticed that the 
volunteers, when discouraged, would often push 
harder and harder at their jobs, only to feel as 
if they were achieving less and less. The result, 
in 1974, was the book Burnout: The High Cost of 
High Achievement. Others soon followed. A subspecialty of psychology was born.


Back in the seventies, when people marched into 
the world with convictions about changing it, 
burnout was considered a noble affliction. It 
meant that you’d depleted yourself while helping 
others. Almost all the research that’d been done 
on the subject, and there’d been quite a lot, was 
on the people in the “caring professions”—nurses, 
public-school teacher

Re: [silk] Flaming Out

-- Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

Udhay Shankar N [08/12/06 12:15 +0530]:

Via Eugen, a nice piece on a topic we discuss every so often.



I'm seeing regular email delivery of silk email to eugen
Could he check his mail queue to see what he's getting?
If he's sending email out of a dynamic IP I might reject it - but he'd then
get a smtp 550 reject / bounce in his mail logs