Re: [silk] Meng Wong on what might happen if most spam "disappears"
Oops! Sorry about the multiple posts! After all the talk about the iPhone, I decided to pick one up after all! And it looks like if you save a mail as draft on the iPhone, it decides to post a copy anyway, as insurance! :) Venky. On 11/3/07, Venky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 3, 2007, at 7:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Suresh Ramasubramanian) > wrote: > > >> From: Meng Weng Wong > >> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 17:47:27 -0700 > >> To: [a mailing list] > >> Subject: antispam is working too well > >> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) > >> > >> you know, this just occurred to me... > >> > >> if somebody gets 1 phish a day, they figure out that phishing is a > >> con, and they ignore it. > >> > > But if you teach a man to phish, you feed him for a lifetime! :) > > Venky. > >> >
Re: [silk] Meng Wong on what might happen if most spam "disappears"
On Nov 3, 2007, at 7:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Suresh Ramasubramanian) wrote: From: Meng Weng Wong Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 17:47:27 -0700 To: [a mailing list] Subject: antispam is working too well X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) you know, this just occurred to me... if somebody gets 1 phish a day, they figure out that phishing is a con, and they ignore it. But if you teach a man to phish, you feed him for a lifetime! :) Venky.
[silk] Meng Wong on what might happen if most spam "disappears"
> From: Meng Weng Wong > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 17:47:27 -0700 > To: [a mailing list] > Subject: antispam is working too well > X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) > > you know, this just occurred to me... > > if somebody gets 1 phish a day, they figure out that phishing is a > con, and they ignore it. > > if somebody gets 1 phish a year, they bite. > > oh noes! we're doing too good a job! > > it is like what my allergist told me: grow up in too clean a house > and you suffer for it later.