Re: [silk] What fun! Create your own Open Source Cinema

2007-05-15 Thread Thaths

On 5/15/07, ashok _ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

it should probably not be called cinema... but something else.


Re-mix-ima?

Thaths
--
Homer: He has all the money in the world, but there's one thing he can't buy.
Marge: What's that?
Homer: (pause) A dinosaur.
   -- Homer J. Simpson
Sudhakar ChandraSlacker Without Borders



Re: [silk] What fun! Create your own Open Source Cinema

2007-05-15 Thread ashok _

i dont think stitching "raw pieces together" can make any kind of
watchable cinema

it should probably not be called cinema... but something else.

On 5/15/07, Venkat Mangudi  wrote:


I think the difference is that everyone can be a part of creating the
cinema. As I understand it, they have requests out there to create some
movies and if you wish, you can download the raw pieces and stitch them
together.




Re: [silk] What fun! Create your own Open Source Cinema

2007-05-15 Thread Christopher M. Kelty


source != actors/scenes
source = footage, edits, tracks.  

the real question is, is it watchable? (i.e does it compile) :)

ck

On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:06:45AM -0400, Vinit Bhansali wrote:
> Sounds more like long-distance collaborative production mixed with the CC
> license
> (CC=Creative Commons).
> 
> Still, how can movies be open source? 
> How do I, as a contributor, go and edit another person's movie and remove
> person X from the cast and replace that with a person Y? 
> 
> - Vinit
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > et] On Behalf Of Venkat Mangudi
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 9:55 AM
> > To: silklist@lists.hserus.net
> > Subject: Re: [silk] What fun! Create your own Open Source Cinema
> > 
> > Thaths wrote:
> > > On 5/15/07, Venkat Mangudi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> http://opensourcecinema.org/
> > >>
> > > How is this different from a liberally CC licensed 
> > collection of work?
> > >
> > I think the difference is that everyone can be a part of creating the 
> > cinema. As I understand it, they have requests out there to 
> > create some 
> > movies and if you wish, you can download the raw pieces and 
> > stitch them 
> > together. Is it the same as a liberally CC licensed 
> > collection of work?
> > 
> 
> 



Re: [silk] What fun! Create your own Open Source Cinema

2007-05-15 Thread Vinit Bhansali
Sounds more like long-distance collaborative production mixed with the CC
license
(CC=Creative Commons).

Still, how can movies be open source? 
How do I, as a contributor, go and edit another person's movie and remove
person X from the cast and replace that with a person Y? 

- Vinit

> -Original Message-
> From: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> et] On Behalf Of Venkat Mangudi
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 9:55 AM
> To: silklist@lists.hserus.net
> Subject: Re: [silk] What fun! Create your own Open Source Cinema
> 
> Thaths wrote:
> > On 5/15/07, Venkat Mangudi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> http://opensourcecinema.org/
> >>
> > How is this different from a liberally CC licensed 
> collection of work?
> >
> I think the difference is that everyone can be a part of creating the 
> cinema. As I understand it, they have requests out there to 
> create some 
> movies and if you wish, you can download the raw pieces and 
> stitch them 
> together. Is it the same as a liberally CC licensed 
> collection of work?
> 




Re: [silk] What fun! Create your own Open Source Cinema

2007-05-15 Thread Venkat Mangudi

Thaths wrote:

On 5/15/07, Venkat Mangudi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

http://opensourcecinema.org/


How is this different from a liberally CC licensed collection of work?

I think the difference is that everyone can be a part of creating the 
cinema. As I understand it, they have requests out there to create some 
movies and if you wish, you can download the raw pieces and stitch them 
together. Is it the same as a liberally CC licensed collection of work?




Re: [silk] What fun! Create your own Open Source Cinema

2007-05-15 Thread Thaths

On 5/15/07, Venkat Mangudi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

http://opensourcecinema.org/

Will this be destructive or constructive? Going by the open source
revolution, it is surely going to change the way audio-visual art is
being sold/presented to the world.


How is this different from a liberally CC licensed collection of work?

Thaths
--
Homer: He has all the money in the world, but there's one thing he can't buy.
Marge: What's that?
Homer: (pause) A dinosaur.
   -- Homer J. Simpson
Sudhakar ChandraSlacker Without Borders