RE: CSSerious EIS Colour Questions.

2010-04-16 Thread Neville Munn

Sorry, I believe I still haven't answered this.
 
Rather difficult to say really, light intensity, or lack of intensity, tends to 
dull the red colour down a little, suspect with new batteries colour shade 
would be similar to the others.  The others look like they could burn a hole in 
the wall {if you get my drift} but this one shows nowhere near as bright a spot 
on the wall.  This particular laser is only small though, and only throws a 
small spot, but nevertheless it appears I've learnt something here about lasers 
and how they lose their efficiency as batteries drain over time and use, or 
there are differences in light emitting 'globe?' sizes which make a difference 
to laser function.  
 
Have to rethink my position on lasers indicating pretty much anything now, 
apart from something being in the water besides water.
 
My theory on lasers indicating...nil, some or many particles seems to have 
fallen into a rather large hole!!  Oh well, a bit more humble pie won't kill 
me.  Those who know better would have ignored my ramblings anyway.
 
I think I've been given the answer though, if lasers need a specific amount of 
'power' then that's what's wrong, batteries must be below that power 'limit' 
for laser to function adequately thru a liquid, even though it throws a spot on 
a wall as it exits the container.
 
N.
 
 Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:15:03 -0400
 From: mdud...@king-cart.com
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: Re: CSSerious EIS Colour Questions.
 
 I had asked before but did not see an answer. Does the shade of red look 
 different for that laser?
 
 Marshall
 
 
 
_
If It Exists, You'll Find it on SEEK. Australia's #1 job site
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/157639755/direct/01/

RE: CSwhere is everyone?/...TAITP~WBSF?

2010-04-16 Thread Tony Moody
Hi Shar,

Theoretically It will probably have degrade a bit , It looses strength by 
outgassing slowly. I have 1/2 a litre of the 35% in exactly the same 
place in my frig, but mine is in its glass bottle, in a strong plastic 
screwtop transport container. It gets used slowly here and I can't say 
if it is weaker than it was when I bought it years ago. But the paper 
label on the bottle has disappeared; eaten by the H2O2 .

OK,
Tony 


On 15 Apr 2010 at 15:19, starshar wrote about :
Subject : RE: CSwhere is everyone?/...TAITP

 Oh boy. 
 I guess I'd better ask this question.
 I've had a pint of 35% in the freezer for at least the past 8 yrs.
 It's
 buried under and behind everything, and I think I've got it wrapped in
 foil.
 
 Any comments? (just the prinitable ones, please!)
 
 ;-)
 
 Sharon
 
 
  From: Tony Moody [mailto:a...@new.co.za]
  Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 2:58 PM
 
 
  Hi Dee,
  
  Yes , Take it out of the cardboard tube, You could wrap it in
 something
  plastic like bubble wrap if you feel nervous about it it bumping
 about.
  It would be good to keep it in a closed plastic container in the
 frig.
  And very prominently marked.
  
  Umm If somebody does take a drink of it get them to drink water to
 dilute
  the h202. There will be copious foam generated which must be burped
 to
  release. They must drink glass after glass of water .
  
  Maybe take it to your pharmacy to keep for you.
  
  OK.
  Tony
  
  On 15 Apr 2010 at 18:06, Dorothy Fitzpatrick wrote about :
  Subject : Re: CSwhere is everyone?/...TAITP
  
   Thanks for this Del--it is scary!  I have mine in the freezer but
 the
   lid is tightly closed so none gets out.  It is also in a cardboard
 tube.
   Do you think I should take it out of there?  I can't wait to get
 rid
 of
   it actually - and just go back to 3% as I am a bit of a coward
 about
   things combustible!  dee
 
 
 
 --
 The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
   Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
 
 Unsubscribe:
   mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe
 Archives: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html
 
 Off-Topic discussions: mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
 List Owner: Mike Devour mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com
 




RE: CS Successful Tooth Tubule Disinfection In Vivo??

2010-04-16 Thread Ode Coyote



 Tubules extend all the way to the enamel and to the surface of the tooth 
under the gum line.
They are a thermally conductive pathway straight to the nerves inside as 
well as being porous and subject to the invasion of microbes that cause decay.

If you have receding gums, they are exposed.
Fluoride seals tubules preventing decay and reduces sensitivity but also 
embrittles the tooth. [Fluoridosis]
If you could use Silver for that..it's not toxic, kills those germs and 
doesn't make teeth brittle.


Deep cavities, tooth caps and root canals are already sealed with a thin 
layer of Silver foil glued on with a sort of varnish and have been for many 
years.
Recall that probe pushing and paint smell just before the dentist packs the 
filler in or cements the cap on?


Ode



At 07:23 PM 4/15/2010 +, you wrote:

Hi Steve,

My apologies for this late reply, I have actually been out of circulation 
for a few days and have just replied to your AgCl post, above :).


Yes, your assessment of my question is exactly what I meant...Or for 
someone who is about to get a tooth capped.


I've located the yahoo group named Microelectricitygermkiller, thanks to 
Sandy, and their device named Godzilla, which I only have half the parts 
to build yet, seems to do exactly what I am looking for.


I will know more, of course, as soon as I finish getting it built, and 
will report back here whatever I experience.


Thank you Steve, stay well :).

Linda :)
---

-- Original message from Norton, Steve 
stephen.nor...@ngc.com: --


What do you mean by an infection in tooth tubules? Tooth tubules are very 
small. Are you talking about an infection within individual tooth 
tubules? Does the person with the infection have a problem with missing 
tooth enamel or exposed

 tooth roots?
 Thanks,
 Steve N



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
 Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe:
 mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe
Archives: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html


Off-Topic discussions: mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
List Owner: Mike Devour mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com




Re: CSThe deposition of AgCl into tubules of the human tooth dentine

2010-04-16 Thread Ode Coyote



  To seal them up with a germ killing substance to prevent cavities and 
sensitive teeth and gum line infections.instead of using flouride for 
the sealing job with a toxic substance.


Possibly a brilliantly simple solution to an ancient problem.

Ode



At 10:56 AM 4/15/2010 -0500, you wrote:

I ran across the abstract for the article below but unfortunately it is
one you have to purchase. While I find it curious, I am not convinced it
is worth purchasing. I am wondering if anyone has any ideas as to why
someone would even want to determine the deposition rate of AgCl into
the tubules of the human tooth dentine by a DC current. A Google search
did not turn up anything. Any ideas???

 - Steve N


http://iopscience.iop.org/0022-3727/34/6/303;jsessionid=A0C8837D4A7B340D
8F93B04995D89B83.c3

The deposition of AgCl into tubules of the human tooth dentine

Abstract
The deposition of AgCl in the human tooth dentine was studied as a
function of the time and dc electrical field using a scanning electron
microscope and by measurements of the frequency-dependent complex
dielectric constant. Dielectric properties of the tooth dentine can be
well described by the model which was recently developed for the
dielectric response of hydrating porous cement paste. The fractal
dimension of the tooth dentine was determined by the electron microscopy
and dielectric spectroscopy techniques.


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
  Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe:
  mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subjectsubscribe
Archives:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html

Off-Topic discussions: mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
List Owner: Mike Devour mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com




Re: CSSerious EIS Colour Size/Zeta=[Malvern DLS]

2010-04-16 Thread Marshall Dudley

Neville Munn wrote:
Apologies for the appalling way in which I put my queries, and 
I'll answer in one go here.
 
1) Particle size and beam strength:  What I meant to say 
was...although the other colour reflected/refracted? is grey and 
unseen with naked eye, if the light beam is 'reflected' from the 
larger particles among the smaller particles, could that be a 
misguided belief that there are a large number of larger particles 
present in a given solution, when in actual fact there isn't?
 
Example: Lemon yellow solution {although this would apply to a clear 
solution as well}...shine laser thru solution...strong beam of light 
suggesting larger particles, BUT, could that beam strength also 
indicate light 'refracting?' off those larger particles and as it 
scatters in the liquid 'reflect?' light off the smaller ones, giving 
the illusion that there are *many* larger particles in solution due to 
beam strength, when if fact there may be a *lesser* number of larger 
particles but the beam strength indicates otherwise. 
 
As I indicated before the liquid is isotropic, thus whether any photons 
refracted then hit a small particle is irrelevant, the probability of 
hitting a small particle is the same regardless of what direction the 
photon is moving.  However if it is refracted it could end up outside of 
the beam when it hits a particle, thus in actuality refraction would 
result in a slight reduction in the intensity of the beam.
In a clear solution that beam would just appear stronger than perhaps 
it otherwise would in a clear solution with minimal larger particles.  
Jeez, I don't know if this is decipherable either?
Look at the equations, they tell the complete story.  Reflection off a 
particle goes up by the 6th power of the size of that particle.  So if 
you have 1% large particles which are 10 times bigger than 99% small 
particles (by count, not ppm), then the amount of light coming off the 
large particles will be 10^6/100, or 10,000 times as bright as what is 
coming off the small particles even though they only account for 1% of 
the partiles..
 
I'll move on to the other one...
 
2) Laser failing to pass thru liquid:  Shone light thru 
solution...puts spot on wall as light exits glass but no path thru 
liquid.  I believe both you and Dok have answered this one now.  
Although you're right regarding spot 'size' on wall, I've switched 
batteries over from laser with larger spot size {now there's the 
appropriate larger spot size on wall with this laser} and there 
appears to be little difference.  If I look *real* close I can see a 
*very* faint beam, but when batteries are returned to original laser 
that beam is *very* evident.  This suggests to me that there is a 
basic difference in construction of both lasers {for the want of 
better description}.
Laser light is laser light. If you are seeing a difference then it is 
going to be either a difference in the intensity of the beam, or a lack 
of coherence implying tht one is not lasing, provided they are the same 
wavelength.
 
I believe I understand the different apearance of a laser spot as 
compared to an LED.  An led couldn't really be defined as a 'spot', 
besides, they won't light up the trees 15 streets away with a 'spot'.
A laser beam is both coherent as well as columinated.  An LED is 
neither. A non lasing laser is an LED.


Marshall
 
If I still haven't made myself clear I guess we'll have to put it down 
to a failure to communicate with the uneducated.
 
Your 'spot size on wall' indictor for the laser is very useful too 
Marshall, Thanks very much for that.  I knew there was a reason I 
don't participate in other discussion groups anymore g.
 
N.
 
 
 Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:09:51 -0400

 From: mdud...@king-cart.com
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: Re: CSSerious EIS Colour Size/Zeta=[Malvern DLS]

 You might be correct there, but I had assumed that the statement 
that it

 was throwing a good spot on the wall meant that it was lasing. If the
 spot is more than 1/4 inch in diameter at 10 feet, then it would not be
 a good spot on the wall as far as I am concerned. So, how big is the
 spot on the wall at 10 to 20 feet? Should be about the size of a
 pencil. If it is bigger then the laser is not lasing and is nothing
 more than an LED.

 Marshall



Find it at CarPoint.com.au New, Used, Demo, Dealer or Private? 
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/206222968/direct/01/



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
 Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe:
 mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe
Archives: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html


Off-Topic discussions: mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
List Owner: Mike Devour mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com




Re: CSwhere is everyone?/...TAITP~WBSF?

2010-04-16 Thread Dorothy Fitzpatrick
Thanks Tony.  dee

On 15 Apr 2010, at 19:57, Tony Moody wrote:

 Hi Dee,
 
 Yes , Take it out of the cardboard tube, You could wrap it in something 
 plastic like bubble wrap if you feel nervous about it it bumping about. 
 It would be good to keep it in a closed plastic container in the frig. 
 And very prominently marked. 
 
 Umm If somebody does take a drink of it get them to drink water to dilute 
 the h202. There will be copious foam generated which must be burped to 
 release. They must drink glass after glass of water .
 
 Maybe take it to your pharmacy to keep for you. 
 
 OK.   
 Tony
 


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
  Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe:
  mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe
Archives: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html

Off-Topic discussions: mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
List Owner: Mike Devour mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com




Re: CSwhere is everyone?/...TAITP~WBSF?

2010-04-16 Thread Dorothy Fitzpatrick
This is what my shop bought one says too.  Wish I'd stayed with it!  dee

On 15 Apr 2010, at 22:32, sol wrote:

 Ode Coyote wrote:
  Not all brands use stabilizers.
 
 Diamond brand from the Dollar Tree is 100%  3% peroxide and water.
 
 It's cheap [$1] and they aren't concerned if it doesn't last a long time.
 Shows what I get for not re-checking labels in years. I checked the 3% I have 
 on hand, plus checked two other brands at local disounters (Family Dollar and 
 Shopko/Pamida) and none have any stabilizers, just H202 and purified water. 
 This is interesting, as I'm certain I remember some other inactive 
 ingredients being present years ago.
 sol
 
 


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
  Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe:
  mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe
Archives:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html

Off-Topic discussions: mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
List Owner: Mike Devour mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com




CSWisconsin Legislators Approve State Microbe

2010-04-16 Thread Nenah Sylver
The article Wisconsin Legislators Approve State Microbe from The New York
Times is on the level, humorous and charming. 

 

It's also short. Here's the link: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/16/us/16microbe.html?ref=todayspaper




Nenah 



RE: CSwhere is everyone?/...TAITP~WBSF?

2010-04-16 Thread starshar
Hi Tony

You say your's is in the refrigerator, but it's in glass. Mine is in the
freezer, but it's in plastic.

(one of these days I'll dig it out and see how  it's holding up!)

I'm just trying to weigh the benefits and drawbacks on either side of
this storage equation.
Thanks for letting me know I'm not the only H2O2 packrat!

Sharon

 
 Hi Shar,
 
 Theoretically It will probably have degrade a bit , It looses strength
by
 outgassing slowly. I have 1/2 a litre of the 35% in exactly the same
 place in my frig, but mine is in its glass bottle, in a strong plastic
 screwtop transport container. It gets used slowly here and I can't
say
 if it is weaker than it was when I bought it years ago. But the paper
 label on the bottle has disappeared; eaten by the H2O2 .
 
 OK,
 Tony
 
 
 On 15 Apr 2010 at 15:19, starshar wrote about :
 Subject : RE: CSwhere is everyone?/...TAITP
 
  Oh boy.
  I guess I'd better ask this question.
  I've had a pint of 35% in the freezer for at least the past 8 yrs.
  It's
  buried under and behind everything, and I think I've got it wrapped
in
  foil.
 
  Any comments? (just the prinitable ones, please!)
 
  ;-)
 
  Sharon
 
 
   From: Tony Moody [mailto:a...@new.co.za]
   Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 2:58 PM
 
 
   Hi Dee,
  
   Yes , Take it out of the cardboard tube, You could wrap it in
  something
   plastic like bubble wrap if you feel nervous about it it bumping
  about.
   It would be good to keep it in a closed plastic container in the
  frig.
   And very prominently marked.
  
   Umm If somebody does take a drink of it get them to drink water to
  dilute
   the h202. There will be copious foam generated which must be
burped
  to
   release. They must drink glass after glass of water .
  
   Maybe take it to your pharmacy to keep for you.
  
   OK.
   Tony
  
   On 15 Apr 2010 at 18:06, Dorothy Fitzpatrick wrote about :
   Subject : Re: CSwhere is everyone?/...TAITP
  
Thanks for this Del--it is scary!  I have mine in the freezer
but
  the
lid is tightly closed so none gets out.  It is also in a
cardboard
  tube.
Do you think I should take it out of there?  I can't wait to get
  rid
  of
it actually - and just go back to 3% as I am a bit of a coward
  about
things combustible!  dee
 
 
 
  --
  The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal
Silver.
Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
 
  Unsubscribe:
mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe
  Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html
 
  Off-Topic discussions: mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
  List Owner: Mike Devour mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com
 




Re: CSMaking 100% colloidal EIS

2010-04-16 Thread poast
It has been about a month now, and I decided to check my 100% colloidal
solution.

I opened the lid, and the solution is brown.

Maybe closer to reddish brown.

It has a weak tyndale effect.

This is the solution that I added baking soda to in an effort to raise the
PH to neutral.

Is brown good?

Any ideas?

Tom




- Original Message - 
From: poast po...@prodigy.net
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: CSMaking 100% colloidal EIS


 Hello Steve,

 Original color was clear, upon adding the ascorbic acid the solution
turned
 cloudy but the color was still clear, after a few days most of the
 cloudiness cleared up and it is still clear in color.  The tyndall effect
is
 much stronger after adding the ascorbic acid.

 Tom

 - Original Message - 
 From: Norton, Steve stephen.nor...@ngc.com
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 7:58 AM
 Subject: RE: CSMaking 100% colloidal EIS


 Tom,
 What was the color of your solution before and after adding ascorbic
 acid? Did the color change after the precipitated occurred?
 Thanks,
 Steve N

 -


 --
 The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
   Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

 Unsubscribe:
   mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe
 Archives:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html

 Off-Topic discussions: mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
 List Owner: Mike Devour mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com




CSYO YO EIS

2010-04-16 Thread poast
I have been exercising some EIS over the past few days.

I started out with a solution that had a conductivity of about 15 uS.

I added a very small amount of ascorbic acid.  The solution turned amber brown, 
then went to grey.  However, when I held it up to sunlight, it was more amber, 
but under the kitchen light it was grey.

I then added some H2O2 and didn't think it was going to do anything, but the 
next day the solution was clear, with a good Tyndale effect.  Conductivity is 
up to 25 uS.

I then added some more ascorbic acid, and once again ended up with a grey 
solution.

Add more H2O2 and after a while it clears back up.  At this point the 
conductivity of the solution was about 75 uS.

Once again I add some ascorbic acid.  This time there wasn't much of a 
reaction.  I added a little more, and after some time the solution turned to a 
light grey.

Add more H2O2 and after a while it goes clear again.  Conductivity is now up to 
115 uS.

Added more ascorbic acid and nothing happened.  Added more and finally the 
reaction started.  Let it sit for a few hours, and once again the solution is 
slightly grey.

Add more H2O2 and after a while it goes clear again.  Conductivity is up to 185 
uS.



Questions...

What is going on?

Have I worn this solution out, or is it still good for something?

Is the increase in conductivity due to the addition of the ascorbic acid? Or am 
I chemically making a higher concentration?

Is this similar to what goes on inside the body?

Is this of any use to anyone?  

It was a fun experiment, but I am not sure if it has value.  I have to confess 
that I am having too much fun.

Tom

Re: CSYO YO EIS

2010-04-16 Thread Malcolm
Hi,
My best guess; you're measuring the conductivity of a weak acid,
ascorbic.  It likes to interact with hydrogen peroxide.  Here's the
story from wiki, and I suspect the silver ion is just getting booted
around becoming an oxide, then an ion, etc.  Dunno; Marshall or Steve
are the chemists, but the reaction between H2O2 and ascorbic stops the
classic free-radical 'Jacob's ladder' of monoatomic oxygen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid

Take care, 
Malcolm

On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 21:09 -0800, poast wrote:
 I have been exercising some EIS over the past few days.
  
 I started out with a solution that had a conductivity of about 15 uS.
  
 I added a very small amount of ascorbic acid.  The solution turned
 amber brown, then went to grey.  However, when I held it up to
 sunlight, it was more amber, but under the kitchen light it was grey.
  
 I then added some H2O2 and didn't think it was going to do anything,
 but the next day the solution was clear, with a good Tyndale effect.
 Conductivity is up to 25 uS.
  
 I then added some more ascorbic acid, and once again ended up with a
 grey solution.
  
 Add more H2O2 and after a while it clears back up.  At this point the
 conductivity of the solution was about 75 uS.
  
 Once again I add some ascorbic acid.  This time there wasn't much of a
 reaction.  I added a little more, and after some time the solution
 turned to a light grey.
  
 Add more H2O2 and after a while it goes clear again.  Conductivity is
 now up to 115 uS.
  
 Added more ascorbic acid and nothing happened.  Added more and finally
 the reaction started.  Let it sit for a few hours, and once again the
 solution is slightly grey.
  
 Add more H2O2 and after a while it goes clear again.  Conductivity is
 up to 185 uS.
  
  
  
 Questions...
  
 What is going on?
  
 Have I worn this solution out, or is it still good for something?
  
 Is the increase in conductivity due to the addition of the ascorbic
 acid? Or am I chemically making a higher concentration?
  
 Is this similar to what goes on inside the body?
  
 Is this of any use to anyone?  
  
 It was a fun experiment, but I am not sure if it has value.  I have to
 confess that I am having too much fun.
  
 Tom


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
  Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe:
  mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe
Archives: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html

Off-Topic discussions: mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
List Owner: Mike Devour mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com