CS>Fwd: Any thoughts on this article

[Gmail]

When the tide goes out, we will know who has been swimming naked--Buffet

> 
> Wondering if you agree with the comments here. They have a link to hit for 
> companies they recommend. The Silver Puppy is not on that link.
> 
> http://www.silver-colloids.com/Reports/reports.html?partner=37&gclid=Cj0KEQjwvo6wBRCG3Zv92ZSLlIYBEiQA5PLVAhcKQQMkolPOgto_7A5bGFAIhKrl_Lq6wVdTXQHd7jgaApZe8P8HAQ
> 
> D. Kevin Desmond
> The people are the government, administering it by their agents; they are the 
> government, the sovereign power.
> Andrew Jackson
> 
>  
> 
>  

Re: CS>Copper vs Silver Colloid Production

[Ode Coyote]

Making colloidal copper does not increase conductivity of the water past
around 3 uS, therefore you cannot pass enough current at your power supply
voltage through the water to make it ever reach your current high side
limit.
It's current that determines the emission rates...copper is just going to
be slow unless to buffer the water [contaminating the copper]
It helps to use a LOT of electrode surface area [Home Depot]

Since copper can't produce "run away" current levels, I just use as much
electrode as will fit in the container, spaced pretty close together,
hooked directly up to the DC power supply by alligator clips with an LED
soldered to one of the leads to indicate that current is flowing.
 I will switch leads now and then...mostly just for grins and giggles.

Monitor with laser till happy..meters won't work AT ALL.

Ode

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Steve Young  wrote:

> Dear list scientists,
>
>
>
> Please help me understand my observed differences in brewing colloidal
> silver vs colloidal copper.
>
>
>
> My generator uses a constant current of about 300 microamps, polarity
> switched about every 20 minutes.  Because of the long time it takes to brew
> a batch, stirring is not needed because polarity switching and natural
> (Brownian) particle movement provide adequate particle disbursement.  The
> electrodes are #12 round wire, 5.5 inches long spaced about 2 inches.  I
> use a quart of steam distilled water.
>
>
>
> For colloidal silver, the brew time is about 24 hours.  At the end of the
> brew, the voltage across the electrodes is about 2.5 volts.  Tyndall effect
> is normal.
>
>
>
> To brew colloidal copper, I used copper wire instead of silver, with all
> else being the same.  At the end of 24 hours, the Tyndall was barely
> noticeable.  So I let it brew another 24 hours.  At this time, the Tyndall
> effect was more noticeable, but fainter than for the CS brew, meaning
> either there were less particles, and/or they were smaller than the silver
> particles.  The voltage across the electrodes was about 7.2 volts, meaning
> the ionic conductivity was about 3 times lower than the silver brew.
>
>
>
> My question:  Why the substantial difference in brew characteristics vs
> time?  What chemically is different about the two electrolyses?
>
>
>
> --Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> [image: Avast logo] 
>
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> www.avast.com 
>
>

Re: CS>AMBER COLORED CS

[Ode Coyote]

If the amber portion  of the silver content is inert, not a
"problem"just not preferred. [by me, anyhow]
But then, we don't know if it's inert or not..."could" be good.

IOW  Won't hurt ya, but might not help ya.

Ode

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:22 AM, mk <2wordsproduct...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 9/23/2015 10:04 PM, silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com wrote:
>
>> Hallo Joy,
>>
>> Could be contamination somewhere. Usually soap or detergent; which could
>> be on the rods,
>> or the container. Could be contact with metal other than the silver, like
>> the connectors to the
>> rods are touvhing the distilled water.
>>
>> OK,
>> Tony Moody
>>
>
>
> So this is not good or normal?
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
> --
> The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
>  Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
>
> Unsubscribe:
>  
> Archives:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html
>
> Off-Topic discussions: 
> List Owner: Mike Devour 
>
>
>

Re: CS>Laser test and results

[Dee]

I get a laser trail just through distilled water, but not tap waterDee

Sent from my iPad

> On 24 Sep 2015, at 02:52, Ed V  wrote:
> 
> On 9/23/2015 5:50 PM, Deborah Gerard wrote:
> 
> What I did was buy a quality CS product,  Sovereign CS, and tested it.  It is 
> a clear product, clear water color, and tested 6ppm.  It is advertised at 
> 10ppm and it was explained that ppm is not a measurement that can be used for 
> CS.  Under the laser light, as explained by other professional makers of CS, 
> you don't see a light trail.  So many opinions, and I guess the expensive 
> testing procedure is the only answer, which Sovereign uses. I figure that 
> using the ppm and getting a reading, no laser trail is a great homemade 
> product. So far, not made yet.
> 
>> How do they know if they even have a product?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wednesday, September 23, 2015 7:51 PM, Ed V  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I belong to a Rife group and the conscientious of the leader is that
>> laser testing and seeing particles means you have a small in size silver
>> product.  It is my thought from reading and testing different products
>> that if you see a laser trail of fine particles, your silver product is
>> too large.  Please, what is the true story?
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
>>   Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
>> 
>> Unsubscribe:
>>   
>> Archives: 
>>   http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html
>> 
>> Off-Topic discussions: 
>> List Owner: Mike Devour 
>