Once again, I'm making sure that "silver-list@eskimo.com" is in the "To" field.
Please, if you see this, respond so I know it went through.
The following is a response I sent to Cyndiann. I appreciate the admonitions
of fellow list members to just put her in my "spam" folder - and I'm headed
that way. This is simply because she responded to a general comment I made,
wondering "aloud" why she is in this group, since she is so clearly wedded to
the pharmaceutical response of vaccines (only) to the Wuhan Virus
Since you responded to my post, I will inform you that I began my journey being
skeptical of the pharmaceutical solutions that were all I was offered when I
was 25 years old. That was 45 years ago. I have been in this group for at
least 15 years - could be longer, since I've been collecting alternative means
to handle health issues for so long. I've been experimenting on myself with
all kinds of alternatives that whole time.
Max has asked you a valid question. You claim to be interested and involved in
alternative medical treatments - where are your suggestions for good
alternatives to the vaccines? Where are your ideas for therapeutics to treat
this Wuhan Virus in its early stages, hopefully keeping people out of the ICU
and off of ventilators? All I can remember is your unwarranted attacks on all
efforts to discuss any alternative that isn't one of these vaccines.
If you are all that interested in alternatives for standard medical care, why
is it all you seem to "push" are those vaccines? That's sure not an
alternative, and the evidence is piling up that they are more problematic than
the pharma industry - and the health agencies that are beholden to them - are
revealing. As I mentioned above, I'm more than willing to experiment on myself
with all manner of alternatives, but I'm staying away from these vaccines
because I'm not so willing to become a guinea pig for an industry that seems
more focused on their profit margin, at the expense of the health and lives of
real people.
Yes, I'm taking Ivermectin, and following the entire prophylactic protocol
recommended by the FLCCC. You call these guys "nutjobs." Okay, so go get your
shots (it's looking more likely that two won't be enough), and don't follow
their recommendations. I've made my choice based on my own research. These
are doctors who are treating Wuhan Virus patients every day; who have been
working for over a year, studying everything they could find to see what they
could offer patients to relieve their suffering. They have rejected many
things, but find Ivermectin is helping. Keep in mind that the WHO, CDC, NIH,
FDA and other "respected" groups offered NOTHING in terms of therapeutics. In
the early days, they were literally sending sick people home to take Tylenol,
telling them to return when they got sicker! Sorry, that doesn't work for me.
These other doctors are willing to try various therapeutics, off-label, rather
than send sick people home with NOTHING.
My reasoning for following their protocol is simple. Ivermectin has a 40-year
history of safe usage, with very few adverse reactions. I think it has less
than two dozen deaths "associated" with its usage in all that time. I found
papers going back about ten years, indicating that doctors in the field had
been observing that Ivermectin appeared to have anti-viral properties, and
because it is cheap and easily manufactured, they've been using it "off-label"
for various other conditions for quite some time. Those vaccines, last I
checked the VAERS numbers, were 10,000 "associated" deaths since December. I
like the Ivermectin odds better. I carefully checked our own health situations
and risk factors, independently, and with our PCP, and determined that the risk
associated with following the FLCCC prophylaxis protocol (started when we were
informed we had been in contact with two people who tested positive and
ultimately did become ill, along with three of their family members) is
acceptable. The way I figure it, at the very least, we're boosting our immune
systems, which can't hurt. I have a rudimentary understanding of why
Ivermectin may be working to help us reject the Wuhan Virus, and that would be
great if it does. At worst, should we contract the virus, our immune systems
are in a lot better shape to address this, maybe keeping us in the more
moderate range of the illness.
I deal with the annual flu in pretty much the same manner. We haven't had the
annual flu shot in about 30 years. Also haven't had the flu, despite the fact
that our jobs involved daily interactions with a variety of ever-changing
people. Haven't even had a cold.
So, how about this as a compromise - you don't have to like or believe anything
you disagree with in this group. Just let the rest of us hash out our various
thoughts and discuss options you may not like without your
