Re: CSCS Website and .05 Generator

2009-06-05 Thread Ode Coyote



  The SG7 has a pump...it's big and expensive, but it'll crank out the 
CS by the bucket.
 It's the Colloid Master that makes the stirring claim..and yea, true 
enough for it's size.
..won't work well on the SG7 as there's too much water that's not between 
the electrodes.

 The SG6 is DC out.

Ode


At 12:37 PM 6/5/2009 +0900, you wrote:
Trem is the one to reply to this in detail, but I it's the SG6 that has 
the stirrer (I have an old model, in which the stirrer doesn't stop though 
the current does).The SG7 claims reverse-current eliminates need for 
stirring I think.




On Friday, Jun 5, 2009, at 01:40 Asia/Tokyo, Marshall Dudley wrote:

In fact looking at the picture it does not even appear to have a stirrer, 
which would make it actually a step backwards from competing units such 
as the SG7.



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com



Re: CSCS Website and .05 Generator

2009-06-05 Thread Marshall Dudley
I have not found that reversing polarity eliminates the need for 
stirring.  They address different problems, reversing polarity stops the 
buildup of silver particles adn silver oxide on the plates, and the 
stirring avoids excessive aggregation.


Marshall

Jonathan B. Britten wrote:
Trem is the one to reply to this in detail, but I it's the SG6 that 
has the stirrer (I have an old model, in which the stirrer doesn't 
stop though the current does).The SG7 claims reverse-current 
eliminates need for stirring I think.




On Friday, Jun 5, 2009, at 01:40 Asia/Tokyo, Marshall Dudley wrote:

In fact looking at the picture it does not even appear to have a 
stirrer, which would make it actually a step backwards from competing 
units such as the SG7.



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
 









Re: CSCS Website and .05 Generator

2009-06-05 Thread trem
Exactly, Marshall,  I found aggressive water movement is required to prevent 
agglomeration.  The  product is then mostly ionic.


Trem



- Original Message - 
From: Marshall Dudley mdud...@king-cart.com

To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 9:14 AM
Subject: Re: CSCS Website and .05 Generator


I have not found that reversing polarity eliminates the need for stirring. 
They address different problems, reversing polarity stops the buildup of 
silver particles adn silver oxide on the plates, and the stirring avoids 
excessive aggregation.


Marshall

Jonathan B. Britten wrote:
Trem is the one to reply to this in detail, but I it's the SG6 that has 
the stirrer (I have an old model, in which the stirrer doesn't stop 
though the current does).The SG7 claims reverse-current eliminates 
need for stirring I think.




On Friday, Jun 5, 2009, at 01:40 Asia/Tokyo, Marshall Dudley wrote:

In fact looking at the picture it does not even appear to have a 
stirrer, which would make it actually a step backwards from competing 
units such as the SG7.



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com








CSCS Website and .05 Generator

2009-06-04 Thread craehow...@juno.com
Found this site and was interested in their Gen which they say producing 
extremely small particale size CS.

http://www.thesilveredge.com/

I have the SG7 which is good but would this other one be better?  Plus they do 
have some interesting free information.

thanks 

connie


Click now to find great remedies for hangovers!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/BLSrjnsJQcS6SEfTOY64MasUUNA43dUrtQArhmRButK7lI9NPvo39cfTctS/


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com



Re: CSCS Website and .05 Generator

2009-06-04 Thread Ode Coyote



  NOT better and most of what's on than site is pure BS and ignorance if 
not plain lies.


Ode


At 02:47 PM 6/4/2009 +, you wrote:
Found this site and was interested in their Gen which they say producing 
extremely small particale size CS.


http://www.thesilveredge.com/

I have the SG7 which is good but would this other one be better?  Plus 
they do have some interesting free information.


thanks

connie


Click now to find great remedies for hangovers!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/BLSrjnsJQcS6SEfTOY64MasUUNA43dUrtQArhmRButK7lI9NPvo39cfTctS/


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com



Re: CSCS Website and .05 Generator

2009-06-04 Thread Marshall Dudley
Appears to be hype, hype and more hype to me.  He seems to be way behind 
the ball on CS stating he did not even find out about it until 2005 
(most of use in this group had been working on making the best possible 
CS for over 6 years by then), and that you had to pay $5 an ounce for CS 
in 2005, when it was readily available for about 30 cents an ounce via 
the net. He says: You no longer have to take high concentrations of 
CS, making it sound like at any point you ever did, and also that there 
is such a thing as high concentration colloidal silver, which there is 
not.  He has a section titled  Why the new micro-particle unit is 
unlike any other colloidal silver generator on the market today, but if 
you read it says nothing about why his is supposedly better. In fact 
looking at the picture it does not even appear to have a stirrer, which 
would make it actually a step backwards from competing units such as the 
SG7.  He is using confusing hype like that his produces particles as 
small as .0008 microns and other unites produce particles as large as 20 
microns.  This is nothing more than sleigh of hand since all units will 
produce particles as large as 20 microns and as small as .0008.  With no 
true technical description of the unit (does it stir, does it use 
constant current, does it have automatic cutoff, does it test the 
quality of the water before starting, does it use polarity reversal, 
does it keep current densities below 1 mA/in^2) I would not even 
consider purchasing the unit.


Marshall

craehow...@juno.com wrote:

Found this site and was interested in their Gen which they say producing 
extremely small particale size CS.

http://www.thesilveredge.com/

I have the SG7 which is good but would this other one be better?  Plus they do 
have some interesting free information.

thanks 


connie


Click now to find great remedies for hangovers!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/BLSrjnsJQcS6SEfTOY64MasUUNA43dUrtQArhmRButK7lI9NPvo39cfTctS/


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
   






  




Re: CSCS Website and .05 Generator

2009-06-04 Thread craehow...@juno.com
thanks...  so much information out there it gets confusing when one want to 
make good choices.

connie


Click to replace your roof - modern technology.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/BLSrjnsIKRpPca3szQ2ewN2OhJY5rIyKBw1sZVCNj14zOrzsqq43wjhm1VW/


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com



Re: CSCS Website and .05 Generator

2009-06-04 Thread Jonathan B. Britten
Trem is the one to reply to this in detail, but I it's the SG6 that has 
the stirrer (I have an old model, in which the stirrer doesn't stop 
though the current does).The SG7 claims reverse-current eliminates 
need for stirring I think.




On Friday, Jun 5, 2009, at 01:40 Asia/Tokyo, Marshall Dudley wrote:

In fact looking at the picture it does not even appear to have a 
stirrer, which would make it actually a step backwards from competing 
units such as the SG7.



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com