Re: CSTesting PPM of ionic silver

2012-05-07 Thread Mike Monett
Ode Coyote odecoy...@windstream.net wrote:

[...]

No meter will measure PPM, but the numbers are about the same between a 
devise that will measure PPM and conductivity readings from a meter that 
won't at around 10-12 uS =10-12 PPM.after the conductivity stops dropping.

The relationship slews off each way in both directions from there a little 
bit for a good guess and beyond 30 uS, all bets run off into make a wild guess.

Ode

If you are seeing a significnt conductivity drop after the brew is
finished, you have a contamination problem, most likely silver sulfide, or
severe leaching from your soda-lime glass. This can easily give 60% drop in
conductivity. If you remove the contamination, the conductivity drop should
be around 8% or less.

The conductivity of a solution is defined as the reciprocal of the
resistance of a 1cm cube. The conductivity is directly proportional to the
number of charge carriers in the solution. This is a linear function over
the entire range of conductivities we use. 

For example, the Hanna HI 7033 Calibration Solution is 84uS/cm at 25C. This
is a single point calibration, meaning all other measurements fit on a
straight line down to zero and are a linear function of the conductivity.

For silver and hydroxide ions, the relationship between conductivity and
ppm is 1uS = 1 ppm, providing you have no contamination. 

I did a study long ago that shows this. Note the measurements cover the
range of 3.3uS to 26uS. Here is the url:

http://silvercentral.org/measure/1us2ppm.htm

There is no reason to expect any deviation above this value, for example in
the SilverCell process that can easily reach 44uS.

If your measurements indicate the results above 30uS are a wild guess,
then there is something seriously wrong with your measurements, or you have
significant contamination problems, or both. 

Since you seem to be insensitive to contamination problems, I would guess
both.

Thanks,

Mike Monett


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
  Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe:
  mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe
Archives: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html

Off-Topic discussions: mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
List Owner: Mike Devour mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com




Re: CSTesting PPM of ionic silver

2012-05-07 Thread Ode Coyote



  Hogwash deleted.

Ode



At 06:21 AM 5/7/2012 -0400, you wrote:

Ode Coyote odecoy...@windstream.net wrote:

[...]

No meter will measure PPM, but the numbers are about the same between a
devise that will measure PPM and conductivity readings from a meter that
won't at around 10-12 uS =10-12 PPM.after the conductivity stops 
dropping.


The relationship slews off each way in both directions from there a little
bit for a good guess and beyond 30 uS, all bets run off into make a wild 
guess.


Ode

If you are seeing a significnt conductivity drop after the brew is
finished, you have a contamination problem, most likely silver sulfide, or
severe leaching from your soda-lime glass. This can easily give 60% drop in
conductivity. If you remove the contamination, the conductivity drop should
be around 8% or less.

The conductivity of a solution is defined as the reciprocal of the
resistance of a 1cm cube. The conductivity is directly proportional to the
number of charge carriers in the solution. This is a linear function over
the entire range of conductivities we use.

For example, the Hanna HI 7033 Calibration Solution is 84uS/cm at 25C. This
is a single point calibration, meaning all other measurements fit on a
straight line down to zero and are a linear function of the conductivity.

For silver and hydroxide ions, the relationship between conductivity and
ppm is 1uS = 1 ppm, providing you have no contamination.

I did a study long ago that shows this. Note the measurements cover the
range of 3.3uS to 26uS. Here is the url:

http://silvercentral.org/measure/1us2ppm.htm

There is no reason to expect any deviation above this value, for example in
the SilverCell process that can easily reach 44uS.

If your measurements indicate the results above 30uS are a wild guess,
then there is something seriously wrong with your measurements, or you have
significant contamination problems, or both.

Since you seem to be insensitive to contamination problems, I would guess
both.

Thanks,

Mike Monett


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
  Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe:
  mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe
Archives:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html

Off-Topic discussions: mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
List Owner: Mike Devour mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSTesting PPM of ionic silver

2012-05-07 Thread Mike Monett
Ken, 

I'm sure glad you know how to tell the difference, and left all the good
stuff!

And thanks for confirming my figure of a 60% drop in conductivity with your
own measurments of 65%. That shows the problem is real and affects everyone.

Thanks,

Mike Monett

Ode Coyote odecoy...@windstream.net wrote:

 Hogwash deleted.

Ode

At 06:21 AM 5/7/2012 -0400, you wrote:
Ode Coyote odecoy...@windstream.net wrote:

[...]

 No meter will measure PPM, but the numbers are about the same between a
 devise that will measure PPM and conductivity readings from a meter that
 won't at around 10-12 uS =10-12 PPM.after the conductivity stops 
 dropping.
 
 The relationship slews off each way in both directions from there a little
 bit for a good guess and beyond 30 uS, all bets run off into make a wild 
 guess.
 
 Ode


If you are seeing a significnt conductivity drop after the brew is
finished, you have a contamination problem, most likely silver sulfide, or
severe leaching from your soda-lime glass. This can easily give 60% drop in
conductivity. If you remove the contamination, the conductivity drop should
be around 8% or less.

The conductivity of a solution is defined as the reciprocal of the
resistance of a 1cm cube. The conductivity is directly proportional to the
number of charge carriers in the solution. This is a linear function over
the entire range of conductivities we use.

For example, the Hanna HI 7033 Calibration Solution is 84uS/cm at 25C. This
is a single point calibration, meaning all other measurements fit on a
straight line down to zero and are a linear function of the conductivity.

For silver and hydroxide ions, the relationship between conductivity and
ppm is 1uS = 1 ppm, providing you have no contamination.

I did a study long ago that shows this. Note the measurements cover the
range of 3.3uS to 26uS. Here is the url:

http://silvercentral.org/measure/1us2ppm.htm

There is no reason to expect any deviation above this value, for example in
the SilverCell process that can easily reach 44uS.

If your measurements indicate the results above 30uS are a wild guess,
then there is something seriously wrong with your measurements, or you have
significant contamination problems, or both.

Since you seem to be insensitive to contamination problems, I would guess
both.

Thanks,

Mike Monett


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
  Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe:
  mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe
Archives: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html

Off-Topic discussions: mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
List Owner: Mike Devour mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com




Re: CSTesting PPM of ionic silver

2012-05-06 Thread Ode Coyote

Both meters measure conductivity and particles aren't conductive.
You have it backwards.

Meters detect ONLY ionic content.

The PWT doesn't run the conductivity number through an equation meant for 
salt water.  Roughly double a TDS number to get what a PWT says.
No meter will measure PPM, but the numbers are about the same between a 
devise that will measure PPM and conductivity readings from a meter that 
won't at around 10-12 uS =10-12 PPM.after the conductivity stops dropping.


The relationship slews off each way in both directions from there a little 
bit for a good guess and beyond 30 uS, all bets run off into make a wild guess.


Ode

At 06:56 PM 5/5/2012 -0700, you wrote:
Monette M mentioned that ionic silver 20+ PPM is good to take when one is 
ill.  How does one measure  ionic silver's ppm.  I have both PWT and TDS 
meters and i understand they measure colloidal silver's particles.


Thanks.

Melly


Re: CSTesting PPM of ionic silver

2012-05-06 Thread Mike Monett
I missed Melly's post so I will reply through here.

TDS meters can have different calibration depensing on the application. One
is a factor of 2 different from conductivity measured with a pwt. The other
calibration is a different number.

You often cannot tell which number was used to calibrate the TDS. So you
cannot simply double the reading.

If you have a pwt also, simply measure the cs with both meters and take the
ratio. This will tell you what the calibration factor is.

You most likely have some silver sulfide tarnish on the electrodes from
automobile combustion and other sources. This releases sulfur ions into the
solution during the brew and can significantly disrupt the brew. The sulfur
contamination cannot be detected with a pwt.

By far the best way to detemine the quality of your cs is with the Salt
Test. It is immune to the contamination and will give you a direct
indication of the silver ion content. Please see the following link for
more information.

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/silvercentral/message/560?l=1

Thanks,

Mike Monett

Ode Coyote odecoy...@windstream.net wrote:


Both meters measure conductivity and particles aren't conductive.
You have it backwards.

Meters detect ONLY ionic content.

The PWT doesn't run the conductivity number through an equation meant for 
salt water.  Roughly double a TDS number to get what a PWT says.
No meter will measure PPM, but the numbers are about the same between a 
devise that will measure PPM and conductivity readings from a meter that 
won't at around 10-12 uS =10-12 PPM.after the conductivity stops dropping.

The relationship slews off each way in both directions from there a little 
bit for a good guess and beyond 30 uS, all bets run off into make a wild guess.

Ode

At 06:56 PM 5/5/2012 -0700, you wrote:
Monette M mentioned that ionic silver 20+ PPM is good to take when one is 
ill.  How does one measure  ionic silver's ppm.  I have both PWT and TDS 
meters and i understand they measure colloidal silver's particles.

Thanks.

Melly



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
  Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe:
  mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe
Archives: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html

Off-Topic discussions: mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
List Owner: Mike Devour mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com




CSTesting PPM of ionic silver

2012-05-05 Thread Melly Bag
Monette M mentioned that ionic silver 20+ PPM is good to take when one is ill.  
How does one measure  ionic silver's ppm.  I have both PWT and TDS meters and i 
understand they measure colloidal silver's particles.
 
Thanks.
 
Melly