Re: [Simh] OpenVMS 7.2 VAX telnet failure

2014-05-01 Thread Lorenzo
Whoa! I've actually found a way to replicate the failure, both on 7.2 and
7.3.
Just expose the machine to the internet and wait for someone to run
some security scan on it, e.g. a command like nmap -v -A IP_ADDR
One or two nmap scans to the host are sufficient to make the telnet
service crash and to render it inaccessible.
I've discovered this after noticing that in my test setup
the only node experiencing the issue was the one publicly
available to the internet.

Here you can find a few traffic dumps, done with Wireshark:
 * working telnet, successful login:
https://enlab.net/~lorenzo/dump/2014-05/vms72_telnet_ok.pcapng
 * broken telnet, stream of chars:
https://enlab.net/~lorenzo/dump/2014-05/vms72_telnet_fail.pcapng
 * broken telnet, stream of chars with some interaction attempts on my
side:

https://enlab.net/~lorenzo/dump/2014-05/vms72_telnet_fail_interact.pcapng
 * full exchange between nmap and the OpenVMS machine:

https://enlab.net/~lorenzo/dump/2014-05/vms72_telnet_fail_nmap.pcapnghttps://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fenlab.net%2F%7Elorenzo%2Fdump%2F2014-05%2Fvms72_telnet_fail_nmap.pcapngsa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNE5fYAFMalm7n4H_ddXOW6SbpdkMQ

In these dumps the OpenVMS machine is always on 192.168.1.17.
This filter rule:
 (ip.src==192.168.1.17 or ip.src==192.168.1.227) and
 (ip.dst==192.168.1.17 or ip.dst==192.168.1.227)
has been applied to the dumps in order to clear them
from all the LAN broadcast garbage.

The last log should be the most interesting one,
as it may contain the key to find out what's going on.
I think that the telnet service is just dying under the
amount of data that nmap is sending to probe it. Memory exhaustion?

To sum it all up, after running a port scan with nmap to audit
my network from the outside... I was crashing my own OpenVMS box.
It's a tough world.

[sent to comp.os.vms too]


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Mark Pizzolato - Info Comm 
m...@infocomm.com wrote:

 You can do BOTH (rule out the variables you have planned), and AT THE SAME
 TIME, collect traffic with WireShark.  You can start Wireshark Data
 collection any time BEFORE (and through) when you start to see the
 problem.  So, even if you’ve already setup the next step in your plans, you
 can still turn on WireShark to collect the relevant data…



 *From:* simh-boun...@trailing-edge.com [mailto:
 simh-boun...@trailing-edge.com] *On Behalf Of *Lorenzo
 *Sent:* Wednesday, April 30, 2014 2:52 PM

 *To:* Mark Pizzolato - Info Comm
 *Cc:* simh@trailing-edge.com; Rick Murphy
 *Subject:* Re: [Simh] OpenVMS 7.2 VAX telnet failure



 As I stated in comp.os.vms too, I came up with this testbed:

  * OpenVMS 7.2, attached to a newer Realtek network card
  * OpenVMS 7.3, fresh setup temporarily running on the integrated network
 card

 Albeit seeming messy, this should allow me to rule out a few more
 variables in ~24 hours.

 In case of failure I'm ready to dump traffic with Wireshark and post it
 here.

 Thanks



 2014-04-30 17:45 GMT+02:00 Mark Pizzolato - Info Comm m...@infocomm.com:

 Of course, you are free to try to work around the issue, but traffic
 captures will explain what is really happening and then determine what the
 simplest workaround might be.  Traffic analysis will either point to or
 eliminate the need or desire to swap cards.



 I’d suggest that you try using the MultiNet IP stack.  I’ve had experience
 with MultiNet  for 20+ years and even now, leave telnet sessions connected
 for many days and never see a problem.  Switching to MultiNet will avoid
 the need to migrate users or configure a new OS from scratch or perform an
 upgrade.  I strongly suspect that both MultiNet and the HP TCP stack can be
 installed on the same system at the same time as long as you only start one
 OR the other in your systartup configuration.



 *From:* simh-boun...@trailing-edge.com [mailto:
 simh-boun...@trailing-edge.com] *On Behalf Of *Lorenzo
 *Sent:* Wednesday, April 30, 2014 8:30 AM
 *To:* Mark Pizzolato - Info Comm
 *Cc:* simh@trailing-edge.com; Rick Murphy


 *Subject:* Re: [Simh] OpenVMS 7.2 VAX telnet failure



 Before starting to dig into traffic captures I'd like to try two more
 things:

 * a OpenVMS 7.3 setup on a new SIMH machine - if that works then I can
 think about migrating users and data from 7.2
 * using a different ethernet card to rule out layer 1 problems

 This problem is not easily reproducible, it just happens, so I can only
 report back after a certain amount of time.
 Thanks for now



 2014-04-30 16:59 GMT+02:00 Mark Pizzolato - Info Comm m...@infocomm.com:

 As Rick suggested, you should capture traffic in both directions.
 Wireshark is an excellent tool for that.  Additionally, Wireshark has
 built-in protocol decoders which can interpret what is happening in the TCP
 telnet session.  If you aren’t familiar with, or don’t want to dig into the
 details of the packet innards, you can save the capture contents, make it
 available, and let me or someone else can interpret 

Re: [Simh] KS10 and the DMR

2014-05-01 Thread R . Voorhorst
The Ks10 Dmr case hos now been solved; the Dmr can be used in Tops10 V7.02 
to 7.05 with Decnet and Anf, but some minor issues have still to be 
resolved.
The trace can be followed at the Simh issue list #100:
https://github.com/simh/simh/issues/100
This trace will be closed but there is a follow-up trace #136:
https://github.com/simh/simh/issues/136
where the last software problems will be ironed out.

Best regards,

R. Voorhorst

P.S. @Mark P: I have tried over the last days to respond/update your emails 
but your mailbox at info.. doesn't work (yet) and it's redirection doesn't 
either. Please respond.



___
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh


Re: [Simh] OpenVMS 7.2 VAX telnet failure

2014-05-01 Thread R . Voorhorst
I have tried this on a Vms 7.3 Vax with the native HP IP stack.
The Nmap scan as you have used doesn't crash the Telnet service, an 
existing Telnet session keeps on functioning.

Best regards

___
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh


Re: [Simh] OpenVMS 7.2 VAX telnet failure

2014-05-01 Thread Lorenzo
After some more fiddling I managed to get ahold of
TCP/IP V5.3 and its ECO-V0503-184 patch.

I've installed them both in my system and... issue disappeared.
The patch isn't really needed, TCP/IP V5.3 should be enough, but whatever.

TRISTE::LORENZO$ product show hist
--- --- ---

PRODUCT KIT TYPEOPERATION   DATE AND TIME
--- --- ---

DEC VAXVMS TCPIP_ECO V5.3-184   Patch   Install 01-MAY-2014
09:55:39
DEC VAXVMS VMS72_PCSI V1.1  Patch   Install 01-MAY-2014
09:53:45
DEC VAXVMS TCPIP V5.3-18Full LP Install 01-MAY-2014
09:51:22

Having installed these patches, I can confirm that
external software can't hurt telnet anymore.
Tested on both 7.2 and 7.3 VAX.
Case closed I guess?


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:29 AM, R. Voorhorst s...@swabhawat.com wrote:

 I have tried this on a Vms 7.3 Vax with the native HP IP stack.
 The Nmap scan as you have used doesn't crash the Telnet service, an
 existing Telnet session keeps on functioning.

 Best regards

 ___
 Simh mailing list
 Simh@trailing-edge.com
 http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh

___
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh

Re: [Simh] [HECnet] TOPS-20 V4.1 DECnet

2014-05-01 Thread Cory Smelosky
Looks like there's no DMC on the PDP-10, no DMC OR KDP on the MicroVAX, 
and no KDP on the VAX780.


However, the PDP-11 has the DUP.  Looks like I can use that as the 
go-between.

--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
___
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh


Re: [Simh] [HECnet] TOPS-20 V4.1 DECnet

2014-05-01 Thread Cory Smelosky

On Thu, 1 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:

Looks like there's no DMC on the PDP-10, no DMC OR KDP on the MicroVAX, and 
no KDP on the VAX780.


However, the PDP-11 has the DUP.  Looks like I can use that as the 
go-between.




Wonderinf if this is an RSTS/E bug...or a simh bug.

Device XK0: does not interrupt - device disabled.

--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
___
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh