[Simh] Revised FP11 debug

2015-03-25 Thread Bob Supnik
I'm looking for suggestions on how to test the revised FP11 efficiently. 
I wrote it so long ago that all my hand tests have vanished.


Bitsavers has a set of paper-tapes for the 11/60's FP unit, but no listings.

XXDP FP diagnostics are white box tests, intended to check out the 
logic paths of the actual implementation. I need black box tests that 
work from the specification, without knowledge of the implementation.


Thanks,

/Bob Supnik
___
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh

[Simh] rsx11m-v3.2

2015-03-25 Thread Bill Cunningham
   I am going to try once again with simh's pdp 11/70 setting generating 
the rsx11m-v3.2. From this page I mentioned before.


http://home.earthlink.net/~n1be/pdp11/PDP11.html

I was about 10 yo in 1979 so I don't remember these machines. But the pics I 
see they looked like beauties to behold. So does anyone with any experience 
in this want to give me any tips? I am going to follow directions from this 
page as far as I can understand.


Thanks,

Bill

___
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh

Re: [Simh] rsx11m-v3.2

2015-03-25 Thread Johnny Billquist

On 2015-03-25 22:32, Bill Cunningham wrote:

I am going to try once again with simh's pdp 11/70 setting
generating the rsx11m-v3.2. From this page I mentioned before.

http://home.earthlink.net/~n1be/pdp11/PDP11.html

I was about 10 yo in 1979 so I don't remember these machines. But the
pics I see they looked like beauties to behold. So does anyone with any
experience in this want to give me any tips? I am going to follow
directions from this page as far as I can understand.


Depends on what kind of tips you want.
The instructions are pretty detailed, and pretty accurate.

If anything, I would suggest generating a system with more memory, 
larger disks, RSX-11M-PLUS instead of RSX-11M, and a more current version.


Johnny

___
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh

Re: [Simh] rsx11m-v3.2

2015-03-25 Thread Mark Pizzolato - Info Comm

On Mar 25, 2015 1:33 PM, Bill Cunningham bill...@suddenlink.net wrote:

     I am going to try once again with simh's pdp 11/70 setting generating 
 the rsx11m-v3.2. From this page I mentioned before.

 http://home.earthlink.net/~n1be/pdp11/PDP11.html

 I was about 10 yo in 1979 so I don't remember these machines. But the pics I 
 see they looked like beauties to behold. So does anyone with any experience 
 in this want to give me any tips? I am going to follow directions from this 
 page as far as I can understand.

Hi Bill,

Your previous efforts were tangled up with the question of the platform you 
were using and the configuration of that platform.  Simh will run on 
essentially all modern OS platforms, but the example you've pointed at was a 
Linux Desktop system (I.e. one with a GUI display environment configured 
running the X-Window system).  Start from that and follow the directions in 
your recipe.

- Mark
___
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh

[Simh] rsx-11M-v3.2

2015-03-25 Thread Bill Cunningham
   I find the part of the page that involves simh setup confusing. it 
mentions a config file. I know where no config file is. It looks like the 
gzip'd files are above a directory called X. then run.sh shell script is 
run. The simh varialbe will need changed to the parth to the pdp11 simh 
emulator. I'll see what I can get done.


Bill

___
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh

Re: [Simh] Revised FP11 debug

2015-03-25 Thread Bob Supnik

Thanks, Don. Good to know who wrote the tests!

Bitsavers has listings for 3 of the 5 11/60 FP tests, so I'm not sure 
whether it's usable. I'll try the 11/34 version, as you suggested, 
although I don't have paper tapes for that, just an XXDP pack (somewhere).


/Bob

On 3/25/2015 4:49 PM, Don North wrote:

On 3/25/2015 8:52 AM, Bob Supnik wrote:
I'm looking for suggestions on how to test the revised FP11 
efficiently. I wrote it so long ago that all my hand tests have 
vanished.


Bitsavers has a set of paper-tapes for the 11/60's FP unit, but no 
listings.


XXDP FP diagnostics are white box tests, intended to check out the 
logic paths of the actual implementation. I need black box tests 
that work from the specification, without knowledge of the 
implementation.


Thanks,

/Bob Supnik
___
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh


Hi Bob long time,

The 11/60 FPU diagnostic listing are slightly mis-filed on bitsavers, 
they are under the CPU directory:


  http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/dec/pdp11/1160/

Rather than in the diagnostics directory as they are for the 11/34:

http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/dec/pdp11/xxdp/diag_listings/1134/

That being said, the diagnostics (I authored the 11/60 FPP diagnostics 
a long time ago...) are by their nature
implementation and hardware specific, especially the 11/60 FP11-E 
specific diagnostics. Some of the system
exerciser diagnostics take a bit more abstract architectural view, but 
still are tuned to the specific hardware
implementations, as that is what manufacturing/field service wanted 
(and they paid for the diagnostics).


It would have been nice to have architectural test suites for CPU, 
FPU, MMU subsystems that would validate
that engineering did indeed build a new PDP-11 that behaved like all 
other PDP-11s, but those were not tests
that existed back then (late 70s/early 80s when I was at DEC) but may 
have come along later in the 80s/90s
with the advent of the F11/J11 silicon. I don't know about that, after 
my time.


The CIS diagnostic test CZKEExx was a bit different; it really was a 
white box test that only looked at the spec
and not the specific implementations. It had an instruction emulator 
and compared expected results from
software simulation vs real hardware. It also built in a large number 
of tabled test cases of known results.


Based on the diagnostics info available I would suggest that there is 
more detailed documentation available
on the 11/34 FP11 implementation and diagnostic listing than those 
that exist for the 11/60, so using the

11/34 as a baseline may be more productive.

Don North





___
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh