Nathan,
A heuristics on heuristics is a great description of my focus...never heard
anyone say that, but it is right on. As a society, we're really starting to
understand knowledge itself, how to organize it, how to store it, how to
leverage it, etc. The 'information age' taught us how to do this.
But we've yet to innovate innovation, create creativity, solve the problem
of the problem, answer the question of the question, etc. I see the answer
to all of these as one answer that centers around an understanding of what
knowledge creation and questions really are.
But I'm pretty sure we're already in agreement and that this is semantics.
I see knowledge creation and questions as onlys part of a larger 'design' or
system. Knowledge creation is only one of the knowledge interactions.
These include:
- Knowledge storagememory and recollectionamount stored equals
intelligence
- Learning and instruction
- Ignorance
- Knowledge creation (includes innovation, creativity, invention, problem
solving, and theory)
- Exposure
- Compilation
- Language design
- Collaboration, sharing and connectivity
- Expression and non-expression
- Questions and anti-knowledge (cumulative questions antithetical to
knowledge)
Note: I noticed different terms used here in this group for what I would
consider the same operations.
At any rate, my thought really is that we're pretty far advanced in all of
these interactions, and actually quite good at some of them, but we've
entirely skipped knowledge creation and questions as a global society. And
answering the 'question of the question' is singularity because this is the
missing link that ties all of these interactions into a definitive and
clearly understood 'design' or system.
While its definitely not the only knowledge interaction, I'd submit that
absolutely none of the other interactions can be fully understood,
developed, or taken to singularity without understanding these two --
knowledge creation and questions.
Kind Regards,
Bruce LaDuke
Managing Director
Instant Innovation, LLC
Indianapolis, IN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hyperadvance.com
Original Message Follows
From: Nathan Barna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: singularity@v2.listbox.com
To: singularity@v2.listbox.com
Subject: Re: [singularity] Re: Intuitive limits of applied CogPsy
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:21:26 -0500
Bruce LaDuke wrote:
In other words, a full understanding of questions and knowleddge creation
is
the step required to realize 'artificial knowledge creation,' which is
singularity. Within the construct of these interactions, 'artificial
intelligence' already exists as knowledge stored and recalled artificially.
I can see the artificial aspect in that and how artificial
intelligence in the technical sense could be viewed as overly
specific.
Now I would say that your general concern with questions seems like a
heuristic about being better with heuristics. With regard to
artificial knowledge creation, perhaps that's only part of a design
process. The design process, then, could be a facet of yet a more
involved engineering project. We would still grant that sometimes new
concepts, or new artificial knowledge designs, are so advanced that
it's nowhere near obvious that they wouldn't be extremely valuable in
a so-called more accountable project in the unforeseeable future.
In any case, Bruce, perhaps you'd agree we should leave room for at
least one more step â unless the above is what you already had in mind
and we only needed to reconcile on semantics.
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
