Re: [sipx-users] SipXecs 4.6 uses Freeswitch 1.0.7
Not exactly a regression test. Might want to do with abundance of caution Sent from my twiddling thumbs. Douglas Hubler wrote: >This made my day, >A.) FS 1.2.1 works >B.) FS from their repo just works > >Thanks Niek. I guess the answer is that is unofficially works, and >use this method until 4.6.1 comes out. > >On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Niek Vlessert wrote: >> Excuse me, what we did was this, even easier: >> - Add Official Freeswitch repo >> - yum update >> - This removes the freeswitch rpm package provided with sipxecs (not the >> freeswitch sipxecs package if you know what I mean) >> - Done :) >> >> Op 14 sep. 2012, om 12:40 heeft Niek Vlessert het volgende geschreven: >> >>> We did try it, by removing the SipXecs Freeswitch RPM and installing >>> 'official' Freeswitch 1.2.1 RPM's. Very basic testing showed no issues. >>> >>> Thanks for the info. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Op 14 sep. 2012, om 12:09 heeft Douglas Hubler het volgende geschreven: >>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Niek Vlessert wrote: > SipXecs 4.6 seems to still use Freeswitch 1.0.7, why is this? Freeswitch > 1.2.1 is available with a lot of nice features. Is it because 1.2.1 is > too new? No, not because it's too new, because we just got caught up in other things. We should put this on the list for 4.6.1 to upgrade. If you want to test, you should be able to build FS 1.2.1 or find an official RPM somewhere and install it in a 4.6 system and see if it works. There's nothing special about the build of FS on sipxecs download. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >>> >> >> ___ >> sipx-users mailing list >> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >___ >sipx-users mailing list >sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] SipXecs 4.6 uses Freeswitch 1.0.7
This made my day, A.) FS 1.2.1 works B.) FS from their repo just works Thanks Niek. I guess the answer is that is unofficially works, and use this method until 4.6.1 comes out. On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Niek Vlessert wrote: > Excuse me, what we did was this, even easier: > - Add Official Freeswitch repo > - yum update > - This removes the freeswitch rpm package provided with sipxecs (not the > freeswitch sipxecs package if you know what I mean) > - Done :) > > Op 14 sep. 2012, om 12:40 heeft Niek Vlessert het volgende geschreven: > >> We did try it, by removing the SipXecs Freeswitch RPM and installing >> 'official' Freeswitch 1.2.1 RPM's. Very basic testing showed no issues. >> >> Thanks for the info. >> >> Regards >> >> Op 14 sep. 2012, om 12:09 heeft Douglas Hubler het volgende geschreven: >> >>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Niek Vlessert >>> wrote: SipXecs 4.6 seems to still use Freeswitch 1.0.7, why is this? Freeswitch 1.2.1 is available with a lot of nice features. Is it because 1.2.1 is too new? >>> >>> No, not because it's too new, because we just got caught up in other >>> things. We should put this on the list for 4.6.1 to upgrade. If you >>> want to test, you should be able to build FS 1.2.1 or find an official >>> RPM somewhere and install it in a 4.6 system and see if it works. >>> There's nothing special about the build of FS on sipxecs download. >>> ___ >>> sipx-users mailing list >>> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >> > > ___ > sipx-users mailing list > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] SipXecs 4.6 uses Freeswitch 1.0.7
Excuse me, what we did was this, even easier: - Add Official Freeswitch repo - yum update - This removes the freeswitch rpm package provided with sipxecs (not the freeswitch sipxecs package if you know what I mean) - Done :) Op 14 sep. 2012, om 12:40 heeft Niek Vlessert het volgende geschreven: > We did try it, by removing the SipXecs Freeswitch RPM and installing > 'official' Freeswitch 1.2.1 RPM's. Very basic testing showed no issues. > > Thanks for the info. > > Regards > > Op 14 sep. 2012, om 12:09 heeft Douglas Hubler het volgende geschreven: > >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Niek Vlessert >> wrote: >>> SipXecs 4.6 seems to still use Freeswitch 1.0.7, why is this? Freeswitch >>> 1.2.1 is available with a lot of nice features. Is it because 1.2.1 is too >>> new? >> >> No, not because it's too new, because we just got caught up in other >> things. We should put this on the list for 4.6.1 to upgrade. If you >> want to test, you should be able to build FS 1.2.1 or find an official >> RPM somewhere and install it in a 4.6 system and see if it works. >> There's nothing special about the build of FS on sipxecs download. >> ___ >> sipx-users mailing list >> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] SipXecs 4.6 uses Freeswitch 1.0.7
We did try it, by removing the SipXecs Freeswitch RPM and installing 'official' Freeswitch 1.2.1 RPM's. Very basic testing showed no issues. Thanks for the info. Regards Op 14 sep. 2012, om 12:09 heeft Douglas Hubler het volgende geschreven: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Niek Vlessert wrote: >> SipXecs 4.6 seems to still use Freeswitch 1.0.7, why is this? Freeswitch >> 1.2.1 is available with a lot of nice features. Is it because 1.2.1 is too >> new? > > No, not because it's too new, because we just got caught up in other > things. We should put this on the list for 4.6.1 to upgrade. If you > want to test, you should be able to build FS 1.2.1 or find an official > RPM somewhere and install it in a 4.6 system and see if it works. > There's nothing special about the build of FS on sipxecs download. > ___ > sipx-users mailing list > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] SipXecs 4.6 uses Freeswitch 1.0.7
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Niek Vlessert wrote: > SipXecs 4.6 seems to still use Freeswitch 1.0.7, why is this? Freeswitch > 1.2.1 is available with a lot of nice features. Is it because 1.2.1 is too > new? No, not because it's too new, because we just got caught up in other things. We should put this on the list for 4.6.1 to upgrade. If you want to test, you should be able to build FS 1.2.1 or find an official RPM somewhere and install it in a 4.6 system and see if it works. There's nothing special about the build of FS on sipxecs download. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] SipXecs 4.6 uses Freeswitch 1.0.7
Hello all, SipXecs 4.6 seems to still use Freeswitch 1.0.7, why is this? Freeswitch 1.2.1 is available with a lot of nice features. Is it because 1.2.1 is too new? Regards, Niek Vlessert Telecats B.V. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
