Re: [Sks-devel] Extended Downtime key.ip6.li
Hello, it was possible to recover our sks installation, so it seems to be online again. Christian ___ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
[Sks-devel] Extended Downtime key.ip6.li
Hello, due to a major hardware failure key.ip6.li is no longer available. sorry for inconvenience Christian ___ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
Re: [Sks-devel] Extended Downtime key.ip6.li today
Hi Nick, thank you for new rpm. I will give it a try. Update with rpm was smooth, Rebuilding database was not necessary. Christian Am 21.04.2012 19:38, schrieb Nick Bebout: > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/sks/1.1.3/1.el6/ now and will ___ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
Re: [Sks-devel] Extended Downtime key.ip6.li today
Yeah, it was a mercurial pull from John's repo on that date. I should have versioned it as a post-release for 1.1.2, but I had done it as a prerelease for 1.1.3 instead. I'll be more careful next time. EPEL 6 builds for 1.1.3 are up at http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/sks/1.1.3/1.el6/ now and will show up in epel-testing in the next day or so. Nick -- Nick Bebout Fedora Project n...@fedoraproject.org > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1,SHA256 > > Christian Felsing wrote: >> Hello, >> >> key.ip6.li should now reachable again. There are issues: >> >> EPEL package sks-1.1.3-0.2.20120124hg.el6.x86_64 contains version 1.1.2 >> >> # rpm -qa|grep sks >> sks-1.1.3-0.2.20120124hg.el6.x86_64 > ^^ > Tells me it was a Mercurial pull on 24-Jan-2012. It's what was to /become/ > 1.1.3, but it would more accurately be called 1.1.2+. Even when Yaron > pulled all > of my changes and did a merges on 10-Apr, it was still 1.1.2. The last > thing we > do is update VERSION and tag the release. I could look at the source and > tell > from which one it was pulled. > > I suspect it was pulled from my hg repo on that date. If so, then it's > missing a > couple of the more important fixes in 1.1.3. If it wasn't pulled from my > repo > and was pulled from mainline, it's pure 1.1.2. > >> is version diff caused by rpm maintainer or is it simply a bug in >> original source ? >> > I vote for packaging error. Ping the Fedora maintainer and get him to > release a > /real/ 1.1.3 RPM. I *KNOW* it's not a bug in the original source because > Yaron > and I were swapping mails all night of the final merges and releases. I > tagged > before editing VERSION and pushing and had to retag after fixing VERSION. > > - -John > > - -- > John P. Clizbe Inet: John (a) Gingerbear DAWT net > John (@) Enigmail DAWT netor: John (@) Keyservers DAWT net > FSF Assoc #995 / FSFE Fellow #1797 hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or > mailto:pgp-public-k...@gingerbear.net?subject=HELP >Cowboy Haiku -- Reflections on Rodeo > So many Cowboys/Round Wrangler butts drive me nuts/Never enough rope > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12-git-509fe4ce-2012-01-31 (Windows XP) > Comment: When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl! > Comment: Be part of the £ÂÂ7 ECHELON -- Use Strong Encryption. > Comment: It's YOUR right - for the time being. > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPkzuPAAoJECMTMVxDW9A0+TsH/16AWDqrOkGxEUjDAOeDsRkL > ajh0RFkLGIWs4rL6VObMcw+8BzgThp48er+pf90mbBq9nJwRChPhl+h1EqJSd7QQ > m8wJmmhZ3PiHoRE5kt5LLyfLNFN4KWvLrpamUt54IMiuKg+7Xt1eHakcEOm3l9aQ > FCRmBCAUxrrMARjH80+BjKPhC/wc4IIb0xLHqmB3aqChbpBhtuGHesgNvCBglFW9 > XEl8S2PJ6YLzt+RFOjMyCU0jb0BcPgal05C992W8j8MKjTgFu6B+r9O/Pnv5EpJz > 0j7sc9MSaddV+Y1ihILhMBf8TdtptzVRhBEEKFwM8FBM9tAJRLOlkZDApu88EHSI > XgQBEQgABgUCT5M7jwAKCRDrXhnz1laYJcEUAP4kULNtKZPibIkJ1JmoJ9IjizhH > L5jPct4D47bv80xW6AD+Jp3sSg1oKL0WHbQqom5AcE0fmlOG34KJF2gnTP6Gt+c= > =icP/ > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > ___ > Sks-devel mailing list > Sks-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel > ___ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
Re: [Sks-devel] Extended Downtime key.ip6.li today
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1,SHA256 Christian Felsing wrote: > Hello, > > key.ip6.li should now reachable again. There are issues: > > EPEL package sks-1.1.3-0.2.20120124hg.el6.x86_64 contains version 1.1.2 > > # rpm -qa|grep sks > sks-1.1.3-0.2.20120124hg.el6.x86_64 ^^ Tells me it was a Mercurial pull on 24-Jan-2012. It's what was to /become/ 1.1.3, but it would more accurately be called 1.1.2+. Even when Yaron pulled all of my changes and did a merges on 10-Apr, it was still 1.1.2. The last thing we do is update VERSION and tag the release. I could look at the source and tell from which one it was pulled. I suspect it was pulled from my hg repo on that date. If so, then it's missing a couple of the more important fixes in 1.1.3. If it wasn't pulled from my repo and was pulled from mainline, it's pure 1.1.2. > is version diff caused by rpm maintainer or is it simply a bug in > original source ? > I vote for packaging error. Ping the Fedora maintainer and get him to release a /real/ 1.1.3 RPM. I *KNOW* it's not a bug in the original source because Yaron and I were swapping mails all night of the final merges and releases. I tagged before editing VERSION and pushing and had to retag after fixing VERSION. - -John - -- John P. Clizbe Inet: John (a) Gingerbear DAWT net John (@) Enigmail DAWT netor: John (@) Keyservers DAWT net FSF Assoc #995 / FSFE Fellow #1797 hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or mailto:pgp-public-k...@gingerbear.net?subject=HELP Cowboy Haiku -- Reflections on Rodeo So many Cowboys/Round Wrangler butts drive me nuts/Never enough rope -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12-git-509fe4ce-2012-01-31 (Windows XP) Comment: When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl! Comment: Be part of the £7 ECHELON -- Use Strong Encryption. Comment: It's YOUR right - for the time being. Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPkzuPAAoJECMTMVxDW9A0+TsH/16AWDqrOkGxEUjDAOeDsRkL ajh0RFkLGIWs4rL6VObMcw+8BzgThp48er+pf90mbBq9nJwRChPhl+h1EqJSd7QQ m8wJmmhZ3PiHoRE5kt5LLyfLNFN4KWvLrpamUt54IMiuKg+7Xt1eHakcEOm3l9aQ FCRmBCAUxrrMARjH80+BjKPhC/wc4IIb0xLHqmB3aqChbpBhtuGHesgNvCBglFW9 XEl8S2PJ6YLzt+RFOjMyCU0jb0BcPgal05C992W8j8MKjTgFu6B+r9O/Pnv5EpJz 0j7sc9MSaddV+Y1ihILhMBf8TdtptzVRhBEEKFwM8FBM9tAJRLOlkZDApu88EHSI XgQBEQgABgUCT5M7jwAKCRDrXhnz1laYJcEUAP4kULNtKZPibIkJ1JmoJ9IjizhH L5jPct4D47bv80xW6AD+Jp3sSg1oKL0WHbQqom5AcE0fmlOG34KJF2gnTP6Gt+c= =icP/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
Re: [Sks-devel] Extended Downtime key.ip6.li today
Hello, key.ip6.li should now reachable again. There are issues: EPEL package sks-1.1.3-0.2.20120124hg.el6.x86_64 contains version 1.1.2 # rpm -qa|grep sks sks-1.1.3-0.2.20120124hg.el6.x86_64 but http://key.ip6.li:11371/pks/lookup?op=stats shows Version: 1.1.2 # rpm -qi sks Name: sks Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 1.1.3 Vendor: Fedora Project Release : 0.2.20120124hg.el6Build Date: Mi 25 Jan 2012 04:57:18 CET Install Date: Sa 21 Apr 2012 15:07:52 CEST Build Host: x86-09.phx2.fedoraproject.org Group : System Environment/DaemonsSource RPM: sks-1.1.3-0.2.20120124hg.el6.src.rpm Size: 2215510 License: GPLv2+ Signature : RSA/8, Mi 25 Jan 2012 17:54:49 CET, Key ID 3b49df2a0608b895 Packager: Fedora Project URL : http://code.google.com/p/sks-keyserver/ Summary : Synchronizing Key Server Description : SKS is a OpenPGP keyserver whose goal is to provide easy to deploy, decentralized, and highly reliable synchronization. is version diff caused by rpm maintainer or is it simply a bug in original source ? Christian ___ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
[Sks-devel] Extended Downtime key.ip6.li today
Hello, due to comprehensive changes to my sks server, key.ip6.li will be down from 08:00 a.m. to 05:00 p.m (UTC) Following changes are planned: * Migration from Debian Squeeze to CentOS * Upgrade sks 1.1.1 (Debian package) to 1.1.3 (EPEL package) * Access through web application firewall * double check peerings after these changes... regards Christian ___ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
[Sks-devel] Extended Downtime key.ip6.li
Hello,
due to infamous
2012-01-27 08:19:28 Raising Sys.Break -- PTree may be corrupted:
Failure("remove_from_node: attempt to delete non-existant element
from prefix tree")
key.ip6.li needs an extended downtime. Running db4.7_recover was not able to
resolve problem.
regards
Christian
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
Re: [Sks-devel] Extended downtime key.ip6.li
key.ip6.li is online again, now. I will give it a try Christian Am 03.01.2012 10:08, schrieb Johan van Selst: > Christian Felsing wrote: > suffice to run a db_recover command that should be done in a couple of > minutes at most. ___ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
Re: [Sks-devel] Extended downtime key.ip6.li
Christian Felsing wrote: > due to infamous ptree error I have to rebuild complete database. Note that rather than a complete rebuild from scratch, it will usually suffice to run a db_recover command that should be done in a couple of minutes at most. Johan pgpPRdVgjVzj4.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
[Sks-devel] Extended downtime key.ip6.li
Hello, due to infamous ptree error I have to rebuild complete database. Christian ___ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
