Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Tor is up for grabs

2022-03-16 Thread Dave Woodfall
On 17/03/22 01:43,
MDrights  put forth the proposition:
> Hi Markus,
> Thanks for raising this thread again, after several months!
> I thought my request was forgotten by folks :)
> Yes, I am glad to take on Tor Slackbuild. I have been a long time Tor user as 
> well :)
> I will submit an updated script shortly.
> My slackbuilds fork: https://gitlab.com/mdrights/slackbuilds/-/tree/local
> Let me know if any of you folks have any suggestions/concerns.
> (I am really feeling painful for the situation in Ukraine. God bless. and 
> hope Tor may help.)
> Cheers,
> MDrights
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:26:02PM +0100, Markus Reichelt via 
> SlackBuilds-users wrote:
> > * Dionysis Ntreou  wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > > I would like Tor too if nobody has taken it .
> >
> > Thank you for your interest.  I would like to stick to the paragraph
> > highlighted >> below for the short term, because Ukraine crisis
> > happened.  I feel an obligation to make this right.  I've seen
> > 'MDrights' work on this list before.
> >
> > so let's see what we can come up with together, eventually.
> >
> >
> > > Although I do not have the same experience as you Markus but I am
> > > keen to learn.
> >
> > We all started at some point. Kudos for starting in the first place.
> >
> > Mabye SBo manages to evolve to the point that there can be a team
> > of maintainers for a given application. IMHO such an approach would
> > need 'release signing keys' like so many other projects use.
> >
> > Not talking about how, or how fast one could get onto the team, it's
> > about trust within the team.  a working team is the goal.  the team
> > shall be resiliant.
> >
> > I was just thinking out loud...
> >
> > We'll see. There's time.
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 5:00 PM Markus Reichelt via
> > > SlackBuilds-users  wrote:
> > >
> > > > * MDrights  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Tor is not taken up by anyone yet, right?
> > > > > I will take it.
> > > >
> > > > I know this thread is old, but: [...]
> > > >
> > >>> > If not, I'll keep holding up the torch.  Let's return to giving
> > >>> > (potentially new) maintainers that fancy 2 weeks grace period.
> > >>> > We haven't heard from you back by April, then we know.

Since MDrights was the first to say he'd take it I've added him as
new maintainer in my branch.

Thanks

--
Dave
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/



Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Tor is up for grabs

2022-03-16 Thread MDrights
Hi Markus,

Thanks for raising this thread again, after several months!
I thought my request was forgotten by folks :) 

Yes, I am glad to take on Tor Slackbuild. I have been a long time Tor user as 
well :)

I will submit an updated script shortly.
My slackbuilds fork: https://gitlab.com/mdrights/slackbuilds/-/tree/local 

Let me know if any of you folks have any suggestions/concerns.

(I am really feeling painful for the situation in Ukraine. God bless. and hope 
Tor may help.) 

Cheers,
MDrights


On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:26:02PM +0100, Markus Reichelt via SlackBuilds-users 
wrote:
> * Dionysis Ntreou  wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > I would like Tor too if nobody has taken it .
> 
> Thank you for your interest.  I would like to stick to the paragraph
> highlighted >> below for the short term, because Ukraine crisis
> happened.  I feel an obligation to make this right.  I've seen
> 'MDrights' work on this list before.
> 
> so let's see what we can come up with together, eventually.
> 
> 
> > Although I do not have the same experience as you Markus but I am
> > keen to learn.
> 
> We all started at some point. Kudos for starting in the first place.
> 
> Mabye SBo manages to evolve to the point that there can be a team
> of maintainers for a given application. IMHO such an approach would
> need 'release signing keys' like so many other projects use.
> 
> Not talking about how, or how fast one could get onto the team, it's
> about trust within the team.  a working team is the goal.  the team
> shall be resiliant.
> 
> I was just thinking out loud...
> 
> We'll see. There's time.
> 
> 
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 5:00 PM Markus Reichelt via
> > SlackBuilds-users  wrote:
> > 
> > > * MDrights  wrote:
> > >
> > > > Tor is not taken up by anyone yet, right?
> > > > I will take it.
> > >
> > > I know this thread is old, but: [...]
> > >
> >>> > If not, I'll keep holding up the torch.  Let's return to giving
> >>> > (potentially new) maintainers that fancy 2 weeks grace period. 
> >>> > We haven't heard from you back by April, then we know.
> 
> ___
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
> https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
> 
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/



Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Tor is up for grabs

2022-03-16 Thread Markus Reichelt via SlackBuilds-users
* Dionysis Ntreou  wrote:

> Hello,
> I would like Tor too if nobody has taken it .

Thank you for your interest.  I would like to stick to the paragraph
highlighted >> below for the short term, because Ukraine crisis
happened.  I feel an obligation to make this right.  I've seen
'MDrights' work on this list before.

so let's see what we can come up with together, eventually.


> Although I do not have the same experience as you Markus but I am
> keen to learn.

We all started at some point. Kudos for starting in the first place.

Mabye SBo manages to evolve to the point that there can be a team
of maintainers for a given application. IMHO such an approach would
need 'release signing keys' like so many other projects use.

Not talking about how, or how fast one could get onto the team, it's
about trust within the team.  a working team is the goal.  the team
shall be resiliant.

I was just thinking out loud...

We'll see. There's time.



> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 5:00 PM Markus Reichelt via
> SlackBuilds-users  wrote:
> 
> > * MDrights  wrote:
> >
> > > Tor is not taken up by anyone yet, right?
> > > I will take it.
> >
> > I know this thread is old, but: [...]
> >
>>> > If not, I'll keep holding up the torch.  Let's return to giving
>>> > (potentially new) maintainers that fancy 2 weeks grace period. 
>>> > We haven't heard from you back by April, then we know.

___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/



Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Tor is up for grabs

2022-03-16 Thread Dionysis Ntreou
Hello,
I would like Tor too if nobody has taken it .

Although I do not have the same experience as you Markus but I am keen to
learn.

Regards
Dionysi

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 5:00 PM Markus Reichelt via SlackBuilds-users <
slackbuilds-users@slackbuilds.org> wrote:

> * MDrights  wrote:
>
> > Tor is not taken up by anyone yet, right?
> > I will take it.
>
> I know this thread is old, but:
>
> Your reply was the only one - after all those months, even with the
> crisis happening in Ukraine just recently.  I therefore may rather
> optimistically assume that involved and caring Tor folks on Slackware
> just know their way around Tor...
>
> I've set up some bridges & relays myself, helped out where I could,
> and still do.
>
> Please be advised that the script, and config, need some adapting,
> bumping things to modern times, but Tor is yours if you still want
> it.
>
> If not, I'll keep holding up the torch.  Let's return to giving
> (potentially new) maintainers that fancy 2 weeks grace period.
> We haven't heard from you back by April, then we know.
>
> And thank you for your interest in taking over Tor SlackBuild
> maintenance.
>
> Best regards,
> Markus
> ___
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
> https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>
>
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/



Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Tor is up for grabs

2022-03-16 Thread Markus Reichelt via SlackBuilds-users
* MDrights  wrote:

> Tor is not taken up by anyone yet, right? 
> I will take it. 

I know this thread is old, but:

Your reply was the only one - after all those months, even with the
crisis happening in Ukraine just recently.  I therefore may rather
optimistically assume that involved and caring Tor folks on Slackware
just know their way around Tor...

I've set up some bridges & relays myself, helped out where I could,
and still do.

Please be advised that the script, and config, need some adapting,
bumping things to modern times, but Tor is yours if you still want
it.

If not, I'll keep holding up the torch.  Let's return to giving
(potentially new) maintainers that fancy 2 weeks grace period.
We haven't heard from you back by April, then we know.

And thank you for your interest in taking over Tor SlackBuild
maintenance.

Best regards,
Markus
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/



Re: [Slackbuilds-users] move cdw category

2022-03-16 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
> I should have thought of this (or remembered?) earlier, but IMHO the
> category for cdw should be multimedia instead of system
> 
> system/cdw -> multimedia/cdw
> 
> to be with the other CD/DVD authoring tools.

Most people will not really care about category anymore to be honest :)
if they search for something and it came up, that's good enough


-- 
Willy Sudiarto Raharjo


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/