Re: [slf4j-user] Which version to use with JPMS?

[Joachim Durchholz]

Am 02.12.18 um 03:53 schrieb Dan Stine:

Here is one resource that covers the topic:

https://blog.joda.org/2017/05/java-se-9-jpms-automatic-modules.html


On Nov 29, 2018, at 2:27 PM, Joachim Durchholz > wrote:


Am 29.11.18 um 16:50 schrieb cowwoc2020:

I'd like to publish my library to Maven Central but it depends upon slf4j
and we're advised not to publish artifacts to central if they depend upon
modules with Automatic Filename-based Naming.


What is "Automatic Filename-based Naming", and why is it a problem?


Ah thanks. I wasn't aware that this refers to the module name itself.

Sounds like SLF4J itself would ideally get a module name, but the 
interface code for each backends would need MANIFEST.MF entries until 
that backend is modularized, right?


Regards,
Jo
___
slf4j-user mailing list
slf4j-user@qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user

Re: [slf4j-user] Which version to use with JPMS?

[Dan Stine]

Here is one resource that covers the topic:

https://blog.joda.org/2017/05/java-se-9-jpms-automatic-modules.html


On Nov 29, 2018, at 2:27 PM, Joachim Durchholz  wrote:

> Am 29.11.18 um 16:50 schrieb cowwoc2020:
> I'd like to publish my library to Maven Central but it depends upon slf4j
> and we're advised not to publish artifacts to central if they depend upon
> modules with Automatic Filename-based Naming.

What is "Automatic Filename-based Naming", and why is it a problem?

Regards,
Jo
___
slf4j-user mailing list
slf4j-user@qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user___
slf4j-user mailing list
slf4j-user@qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user

Re: [slf4j-user] Which version to use with JPMS?

[Joachim Durchholz]

Am 29.11.18 um 16:50 schrieb cowwoc2020:

I'd like to publish my library to Maven Central but it depends upon slf4j
and we're advised not to publish artifacts to central if they depend upon
modules with Automatic Filename-based Naming.


What is "Automatic Filename-based Naming", and why is it a problem?

Regards,
Jo
___
slf4j-user mailing list
slf4j-user@qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user

Re: [slf4j-user] Which version to use with JPMS?

[Ceki]

Hi Gili,

SLF4J API will not change between 1.8.0-beta2 and 1.8.0. You can safely 
rely on 1.8.0-beta2 if JPMS is a requirement.


If you can wait a bit, wait for 1.7.26 addressing SLF4J-420.

HTH,

[1] https://jira.qos.ch/browse/SLF4J-420

--
Ceki Gülcü

On 29.11.2018 16:50, cowwoc2020 wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to publish my library to Maven Central but it depends upon slf4j
and we're advised not to publish artifacts to central if they depend upon
modules with Automatic Filename-based Naming.

The latest stable version of slf4j-api is 1.7.25 but it relies upon
Automatic Filename-based Naming. Version 1.8.0-beta2 is supposed to be
compatible with JPMS but it isn't a stable release.

What is the advised behavior in this situation?

Thank you,
Gili




___
slf4j-user mailing list
slf4j-user@qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user

[slf4j-user] Which version to use with JPMS?

[cowwoc2020]

Hi,

I'd like to publish my library to Maven Central but it depends upon slf4j
and we're advised not to publish artifacts to central if they depend upon
modules with Automatic Filename-based Naming.

The latest stable version of slf4j-api is 1.7.25 but it relies upon
Automatic Filename-based Naming. Version 1.8.0-beta2 is supposed to be
compatible with JPMS but it isn't a stable release.

What is the advised behavior in this situation?

Thank you,
Gili



--
Sent from: http://slf4j.42922.n3.nabble.com/slf4j-user-f41810.html
___
slf4j-user mailing list
slf4j-user@qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user