Re: [SLUG] Co-lo, UML Dedicated servers

2005-06-02 Thread Jeff Waugh
quote who=Dan Treacy

 Just after some recommendations on the above probably in that order.
 
 Machines don't need to be overly powerful but reasonable traffic allowance
 would be good.

www.linode.com - bloody fantastic

- Jeff

-- 
GUADEC 2005: May 29th-31st   http://2005.guadec.org/
 
   PHP, when it first came out, didn't really have any merits, and many
claim it still doesn't, but it filled a void where a simple tool to
perform a simple task was needed. - Rasmus Lerdorf
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Co-lo, UML Dedicated servers

2005-06-02 Thread Piers Wren
I've got 2 UML machines around the place. one on tektonic.net and one on
redwoodvirtual.com.

TekTonic are the better of those two, I seem to get more available CPU.
Ping time is a bit of an issue, but once connected the speed is good.
Support is reasonable but nothing special.

I use redwoodvirtual for my personal server. I'm on the $10/mo plan
which gives me 20Gb/mo bandwidth. It's far from quick (CPU), but
reliable enough (current uptime is 143 days) and capable of running
apache/postfix/spamassassin/bind as long as the load isn't high.
Download speed is enough to saturate my connections. Support on redwood
is pretty ordinary - email them and they get back a few days later.

If you're considering UML, check out www.usermodelinux.org. Click the
'Commercial' link on the right hand side of the page to get a list of a
few UML providers around the place.

My general experience with UML has been great. Just don't expect to run
anything diskspace or memory intensive as it quickly gets expensive.

Cheers,
-Piers.


On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 12:04 +0200, Jeff Waugh wrote:
 quote who=Dan Treacy
 
  Just after some recommendations on the above probably in that order.
  
  Machines don't need to be overly powerful but reasonable traffic allowance
  would be good.
 
 www.linode.com - bloody fantastic
 
 - Jeff
 
 -- 
 GUADEC 2005: May 29th-31st   http://2005.guadec.org/
  
PHP, when it first came out, didn't really have any merits, and many
 claim it still doesn't, but it filled a void where a simple tool to
 perform a simple task was needed. - Rasmus Lerdorf

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Co-lo, UML Dedicated servers

2005-06-02 Thread Michael Fox
On 6/2/05, Piers Wren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I use redwoodvirtual for my personal server. I'm on the $10/mo plan
 which gives me 20Gb/mo bandwidth. It's far from quick (CPU), but
 reliable enough (current uptime is 143 days) and capable of running
 apache/postfix/spamassassin/bind as long as the load isn't high.
 Download speed is enough to saturate my connections. Support on redwood
 is pretty ordinary - email them and they get back a few days later.

Thanks for that. I think redwoodvirtual might do just what I need for
my personal domain. I am sick of the shared hosting. I'd like to
control my box with a rootshell, as I am sick of the hosting firm
doing changes which breaks my online gallery cause they did some to
php or something similar.

The price is reasonable, as long as I can run a http/email with spam
protection etc.. Then I think it will do the job nicely.

 
 If you're considering UML, check out www.usermodelinux.org. Click the
 'Commercial' link on the right hand side of the page to get a list of a
 few UML providers around the place.
 
 My general experience with UML has been great. Just don't expect to run
 anything diskspace or memory intensive as it quickly gets expensive.
 
But it handles the personal domain well right? With no extra costs?
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Co-lo, UML Dedicated servers

2005-06-02 Thread Piers Wren
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 07:06 +1000, Michael Fox wrote:
 Thanks for that. I think redwoodvirtual might do just what I need for
 my personal domain. I am sick of the shared hosting. I'd like to
 control my box with a rootshell, as I am sick of the hosting firm
 doing changes which breaks my online gallery cause they did some to
 php or something similar.
 
 The price is reasonable, as long as I can run a http/email with spam
 protection etc.. Then I think it will do the job nicely.

I'm currently running apache/postfix/spamassassin/bind/mysql/wu-imapd.
You have to be careful in setting up spamassassin to get its memory
footprint down, ie, don't run it through procmail ;)

Since you mentioned you'll be using it for an online gallery, I have
linpha (linpha.sf.net) running on mine indexing about 1gig of photos and
it works. If you're on a quick connection you can notice that it's slow
in rendering pages, but when I put up my wedding pics and everyone was
hitting it to check those out there was no stability issues.

 But it handles the personal domain well right? With no extra costs?

Correct. I spent US$100 for 12 months hosting and haven't had to spend a
dorrar more. The only thing I would consider changing next time is to go
for more than 64meg RAM as that has been the main thing limiting me
doing Cool Stuff.

-Piers.


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] Co-lo, UML Dedicated servers

2005-06-01 Thread Dan Treacy

Morning Sluggers,

Just after some recommendations on the above probably in that order.

Machines don't need to be overly powerful but reasonable traffic 
allowance would be good.


The Co-lo would need to be located in sydney the others I'm fairly 
ambivalent about (but if O/S a nice exchange rate helps)


After experiences both good and bad.

Thanks,

Dan.


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Co-lo, UML Dedicated servers

2005-06-01 Thread Bruce Badger

  Just after some recommendations on the above probably in that order.
  
  Machines don't need to be overly powerful but reasonable traffic 
  allowance would be good.
  
  The Co-lo would need to be located in sydney the others I'm fairly 
  ambivalent about (but if O/S a nice exchange rate helps)

All OpenSkills services are run on UML servers hosted by:

  http://www.bytemark.co.uk/index.html

Which has worked out very well for us.

HTH,
Bruce
-- 
Make the most of your skills - with OpenSkills
http://www.openskills.org/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html